Trump Admin Pauses All Student Visa Interviews, May Include Social Media Vetting

[acptulsa]

What part of, if the hot air from Washington were to and we would no longer be running against this headwind and shipping costs would be all the advantage we need did you not read, bot?

 

[TheTexan]

What part of, if the hot air from Washington were to and we would no longer be running against this headwind and shipping costs would be all the advantage we need did you not read, bot?

LOL the free market is going to fix something that the free market doesn't even think is a problem. And you call me a sycophant ROFL.

 

[acptulsa]

LOL the free market is going to fix something that the free market doesn't even think is a problem.

It's hilarious that you accused me of not reading your post.

 

[TheTexan]

It's hilarious that you accused me of not reading your post.

What's hilarious is that you make an idiotic point about suppliers, I respond to it in logical detail, and you ignore it and post some stupid meme.

Fucking sycophant jesus fucking christ.

 

[acptulsa]

What's hilarious is that you make an idiotic point about suppliers, I respond to it in logical detail, and you ignore it and post some stupid meme.

I ignored nothing. What you're ignoring is that the free market isn't a government. It doesn't have to identify, or create, a problem to act. It doesn't obsess over problems the way you do, it seizes opportunities, and that's enough.

Cuss about that all you want, and see what opportunities you miss while you're doing it.

 

[TheTexan]

I ignored nothing. What you're ignoring is that the free market isn't a government. It doesn't have to identify, or create, a problem to act. It doesn't obsess over problems the way you do, it seizes opportunities, and that's enough.

Do you deny that the extensive network of suppliers, vendors, and industrial customers in China gives China a huge competitive advantage?

 

[acptulsa]

I deny the word huge

Do you deny that China gained what advantage it has after its communist government decided to become less meddlesome than our allegedly non-communist government in order to survive?

Why are you going full retard in a thread that has nothing to do with this? Get this crap split off or duck off.

 

[TheTexan]

I deny the word huge

Well that's your error then.

Do you deny that China gained what advantage it has after its communist government decided to become less meddlesome than our allegedly non-communist government in order to survive?

China was extremely meddlesome in 1980's. Yea, they opened up their economy to the global market. But they were also hugely centrally planned. At the same time, our economy was already opened up to the global market, and was significantly less centrally planned. And China won the manufacturing industry during this time.

Funny how that works.

 

[acptulsa]

China was extremely meddlesome in 1980's. Yea, they opened up their economy to the global market. But they were also hugely centrally planned. At the same time, our economy was already opened up to the global market, and was significantly less centrally planned.

I've answered enough postcards from la-la land. If you want to promote your fictional history start a thread for the purpose.

 

[TheTexan]

I've answered enough postcards from la-la land. If you want to promote your fictional history start a thread for the purpose.

Fictional history LOL

Lets just take obvious facts and call them fictional lol

What I said is unrefutable for anyone who bothers to even check

 

[Swordsmyth]

Discriminating against someone (and as long as Trump is letting in big, beautiful H1B coders there can be discrimination) solely because they spoke ill of Israel is a free speech issue, because that is no crime and doesn't make someone my enemy as an American.

And I'm sick of sliding down slippery slopes with "useful" (to the powers that be) idiots like you.

Didn't shrink the number of foreigners, either. Just did MAGA -- Miriam Adelson's Goals Achieved.

Bunk.
Free speech does not give anyone a right to enter our country, or stay here.
And we have every right to discriminate about who we let in or allow to stay for any or no reason.

And we are shrinking the number of foreigners, including cracking down on H1Bs by increasing the minimum cost of hiring them.

 

[Swordsmyth]

Good.

US higher education for US citizens.

A good way to lower tuition costs as well.

Working class American families should not have to compete with Chinese billionaires and assorted global brown sob stories for spaces in our universities.

Not according to the Treason/Globalist Caucus.

 

[Swordsmyth]

It's misattributed to Bastiat, but it was actually written by a left leaning Philadelphian named Otto T Mallery in a book written in 1943:

In addition to his work in recreation, Mallery is also known for his economic writings. He authored "Economic Union and Durable Peace," published in 1943, which includes a quote often mistakenly attributed to Frédéric Bastiat: "If soldiers are not to cross international boundaries, goods must do so. Unless shackles can be dropped from trade, bombs will be dropped from the sky".

And my question for Mallery and all the other globalist free traders is this:

If that statement is true, why, in the age of unlimited US "free trade" have we been at war pretty much since WWII and have troops in over 100 countries around the world?

We've been at war in order to defend our trade access, war for oil and all that.

Trade CAUSES wars, it doesn't prevent them.
And Marx was a big fan of Free Trade, because it destroyed the middle class and brought on the revolution.

 

[acptulsa]

Oh, good. The other delusional Missouri Mule Big Government Cultist troll showed up.

I'm sure you two can keep each other entertained.

 

[Swordsmyth]

I'm not saying it will last forever. Eventually in 100-200 years some world event is going to change the landscape of things and China's dominance will fall. Or maybe sooner with World War III.



You're basically waving your magic wand and saying the free market will fix it. Fix what? According to the free market it's not even a problem. Who cares if China does all the manufacturing? That's what the free market says. If the free market thinks it's not a problem, how the fuck is the free market gonna fix it?

The "free market" (which somehow includes nonmarket regimes like the CCP) will "fix" it by dragging the whole world down to 3rd world level.
Then the playing field will be level in the dirt.
Free trade is literally trade communism, no society is allowed to keep its markets and infrastructure that it built as its exclusive property, all must allow everyone else to take what they please, from each society according to its ability and to each according to its (bare minimum) need.
And it has exactly the same outcome of making all equal in the dirt. (except those who are more equal, which free trade advocates imagine themselves incorrectly to be part of)

 

[TheTexan]

Oh, good. The other delusional Missouri Mule troll showed up.

I'm sure you two can keep each other entertained.

You laugh, but after that spat with Clayton, I've educated myself on the various Christian religions, and Mormonism seems to be one of the few religions that actually respects self determination in the afterlife. Want to live next to God in his highest kingdom? You can do that. Want to live farther from God? You can do that. Want nothing to do with God? You can do that. And none of it's intended to be retributive. Mormon God just want us to be happy no matter what kingdom we're in

Most Christian faiths seem to say that God created us with free will and then punishes us when we use that free will in a way that displeases him. Mormons actually respect people's self determination in the afterlife

 

[Anti Federalist]

 

[Invisible Man]

Buchanan is 100% wrong. The USA never should have been a nation. It was not intended by those who ratified the Constitution that it become a nation. Its status as a nation was something brought about through conquest by Lincoln. And its endurance as a nation (if it's even accurate now to call it one) is not a worthy goal.

 

[TheTexan]

Buchanan is 100% wrong. The USA never should have been a nation. It was not intended by those who ratified the Constitution that it become a nation. Its status as a nation was something brought about through conquest by Lincoln. And its endurance as a nation (if it's even accurate now to call it one) is not a worthy goal.

I think you're both right

 

[Anti Federalist]

Buchanan is 100% wrong. The USA never should have been a nation. It was not intended by those who ratified the Constitution that it become a nation. Its status as a nation was something brought about through conquest by Lincoln. And its endurance as a nation (if it's even accurate now to call it one) is not a worthy goal.

Of course, I disagree 100%

It was founded to secure the blessings of liberty to the people that fought to define and coalesce and build the nation.

And those people were White Europeans.

It's written down in black and white.

And I will do what I can to prevent MY posterity from being genocided by demographic invasion, alien mind poison and apathy.