Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP): Bigger and More Dangerous Than ObamaCare

FrankRep

Member
Joined
Aug 14, 2007
Messages
28,885

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fHYlZb65gVY


President Obama's Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) is an an all-out assault on our national sovereignty.​


Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP): Bigger and More Dangerous Than ObamaCare


The New American
14 December 2013


We all remember Representative Nancy Pelosi’s infamous statement that we have to pass the ObamaCare legislation so that we can find out what’s in it. That was in 2010 and Mrs. Pelosi was then speaker of the House of Representatives.

Well, Congress followed her advice and passed ObamaCare, formally known as the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. Three years later, in October of 2013, tens of millions of Americans began finding out what was really in the bill, as they began receiving health insurance cancellations and/or massive premium hikes. They also began to learn that under ObamaCare the IRS has been given new powers to go after them, their businesses, and their bank accounts. And that is only the beginning. As with all legislation, the devil is in the details, and lots of devils keep popping out of the constantly evolving details, as dozens of federal agencies continue churning out thousands of pages of regulations to implement the misbegotten, misnamed Affordable Care Act.

There are many important lessons from ObamaCare that we should apply to another huge project that could have a similarly devastating impact on our nation. In November 2009, President Obama announced his intention to have the United States participate in a so-called trade agreement known as the Trans-Pacific Partnership. I say so-called trade agreement because 80 percent of the proposed agreement deals with a great many issues besides trade.

The Trans-Pacific Partnership, or TPP, as it is called, is an all-out assault on our national sovereignty. It would unconstitutionally transfer legislative powers from the U.S. Congress, our state legislatures, and our city and county governments to multi-national corporations and unaccountable international bureaucrats at the World Trade Organization, or WTO. Incredibly, it also would transfer judicial powers from our federal and state courts — which are bad enough — to globalist TPP judges at regional tribunals and the WTO. It would also confer huge advantages on foreign businesses and large multinationals, while at the same time putting companies that operate here in America — especially small and medium-sized enterprises — at a competitive disadvantage. American businesses would remain shackled by the regulations of EPA, FDA, OSHA, etc. while their foreign competitors could operate here unimpeded by those same strictures.

Like the infamous NAFTA trade agreement passed in the '90s, the TPP would usher in another wave of outsourcing, as the remaining manufacturing and technology bases would be given incentives to move to Pacific Rim countries, resulting in millions more American job losses.

With TPP negotiations on track to be completed by the end of 2013, President Obama will likely ask Congress to approve this trade agreement in early 2014. Contact your senators and representative and urge them to oppose the Trans-Pacific Partnership, and see the many additional articles listed below the video that we’ve published detailing the dangers of the TPP.



Related articles:

WikiLeaks Publishes Key Chapter of Secret TPP Agreement

Regional Scheme for the Pacific Rim

Trans-Pacific Partnership Ready for Christmas Delivery?

TPP Secret Trade Agreement Puts International Tribunal Above U.S.

The “Free Trade” Agenda Threatens Our Rights

Trans-Pacific Partnership: Secret Surrender of Sovereignty

Japan Set to Join TPP as Secret Negotiations Continue in Malaysia

Goal of TPP: Free Trade Area of the Asia Pacific (FTAAP)




How the Free Trade Agenda Is Knocking Down America -- The New American (PDF) Special Report
http://www.thenewamerican.com/files/TNA2917.pdf


Tools to STOP the "Free Trade" Agenda
https://www.jbs.org/shop-jbs/stop-the-free-trade-agenda



Contact Congress:

Keep America Independent: Stop Trade Promotion Authority
https://www.votervoice.net/JBS/campaigns/31469/respond

No Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) Trade Agreement
https://www.votervoice.net/JBS/campaigns/29931/respond
 
Last edited:
Hi my name is reality.

Until people are ready to do more than protest, write their congressmen and "spread the word" the TPP will go through without a hitch.

No outrage over the NDAA which means they can KILL an AMERICAN without charges and it passed no problem for THREE YEARS NOW.
 
here is a site :
Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP)
https://openmedia.org/letter/ca ( a letter tool cdn&usa to fight TPP )
Key government officials and industry lobbyists are about to meet in secret in Salt Lake City, Utah, to hash out an Internet censorship plan that would make it possible for entire websites and families to be kicked off the Internet.

This plan is part of an international agreement called the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) that is being crafted in secret. Over 120,000 people have called on the heads of state of the twelve powerful countries to “Say No to Internet Censorship” in the TPP.

people might move if they know the Internet is in jeopardy !
 
Hello Reality.

I am intrigued by your views and would like to subscribe to your newsletter.

Hi my name is reality.

Until people are ready to do more than protest, write their congressmen and "spread the word" the TPP will go through without a hitch.

No outrage over the NDAA which means they can KILL an AMERICAN without charges and it passed no problem for THREE YEARS NOW.
 
Hi my name is reality.

Until people are ready to do more than protest, write their congressmen and "spread the word" the TPP will go through without a hitch.

No outrage over the NDAA which means they can KILL an AMERICAN without charges and it passed no problem for THREE YEARS NOW.

That phony left/right paradigm continues to suck people in. Both parties are in hot pursuit to make sure this passes. The only true way to take control of this country is to bankrupt everyone in the process...the citizens that is.
 
I'm in favor of free trade and lower tariffs. However, some of the rules and regulations contained in this agreement seem to be so bad that this agreement is more bad than good overall and should be opposed.
 
Ron Paul: Oppose Free Trade Agreements



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OFLRuMHAK_w


Ron Paul says Free Trade Agreements erode National sovereignty, destroy jobs, and only serves the special interests. So-called "Free Trade" is Government-managed trade.​



Henry Kissinger: NAFTA, the Architecture for the New World Order



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sKKwZl1BTxk


Henry Kissinger: NAFTA -- it will represent the most creative step towards a new world order taken by any group of countries since the end of the cold war. The revolution sweeping the Western hemisphere points to an international order based on cooperation. It is this revolution that is at stake in the ratification of NAFTA. What congress will have before it is not a conventional trade agreement, but the Architecture of a new international system - Los Angeles Times, 1993​
 
Ron Paul: Oppose Free Trade Agreements



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OFLRuMHAK_w


Ron Paul says Free Trade Agreements erode National sovereignty, destroy jobs, and only serves the special interests. So-called "Free Trade" is Government-managed trade.​



Henry Kissinger: NAFTA, the Architecture for the New World Order



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sKKwZl1BTxk


Henry Kissinger: NAFTA -- it will represent the most creative step towards a new world order taken by any group of countries since the end of the cold war. The revolution sweeping the Western hemisphere points to an international order based on cooperation. It is this revolution that is at stake in the ratification of NAFTA. What congress will have before it is not a conventional trade agreement, but the Architecture of a new international system - Los Angeles Times, 1993​


He does, however, support unilateral free trade, which is the host country (in this case, the US) removing tariffs, taxes, regulations, and barriers for imports/goods/services/whatever.
 
I can't think of any good reason to have these large trade agreements. Trade policy shouldn't be much more complicated than setting a tariff rate based on the country of origin. You don't need any international courts for that, just an act of Congress.
 
What bothers me the most is that this is ALL being done in COMPLETE SECRET, and have to turn to Edward Snowden once again for information on even general information of what is in the TPP.
 
I can't think of any good reason to have these large trade agreements. Trade policy shouldn't be much more complicated than setting a tariff rate based on the country of origin. You don't need any international courts for that, just an act of Congress.

Here's the real reason:

Henry Kissinger: NAFTA -- it will represent the most creative step towards a new world order taken by any group of countries since the end of the cold war. The revolution sweeping the Western hemisphere points to an international order based on cooperation. It is this revolution that is at stake in the ratification of NAFTA. What congress will have before it is not a conventional trade agreement, but the Architecture of a new international system - Los Angeles Times, 1993

Source 1

Source 2
 
American businesses would remain shackled by the regulations of EPA, FDA, OSHA, etc. while their foreign competitors could operate here unimpeded by those same strictures.

Foreigners will have more freedom than Americans! The Bastards!

We Must stop them! If Americans can't be free, NOBODY CAN!!!
 
The worst part of all is that this will get virtually no attention from anyone.

On the sex appeal scale it's a -5.

I'd bet that 90% of American's wouldn't understand the issue.
(I'd bet that 95% of politicians wouldn't understand it either.)
 
The worst part of all is that this will get virtually no attention from anyone.

On the sex appeal scale it's a -5.

The OP article posted is getting some play on news sites.


http://www.infowars.com/trans-pacif...gger-and-more-dangerous-than-obamacare-video/
http://investmentwatchblog.com/tran...tpp-bigger-and-more-dangerous-than-obamacare/
http://stateofglobe.com/2013/12/14/...gger-and-more-dangerous-than-obamacare-video/
http://beforeitsnews.com/alternativ...e-dangerous-than-obamacare-video-2848732.html
http://infowarriorsunited.com/trans-pacific-partnership-tpp-extremely-dangerous/
http://conservativeread.com/trans-pacific-partnership-tpp-bigger-and-more-dangerous-than-obamacare/
http://www.godlikeproductions.com/forum1/message2436314/pg1
http://viralnewschart.com/ShowLink.aspx?linkId=22902219
http://trenchpress.com/archives/49748/?p=49748
http://www.gotnewswire.com/news/tra...igger-and-more-dangerous-than-obamacare-video
http://www.worldtruth.org/video/128...igger-and-more-dangerous-than-obamacare-yout/
http://www.bhaskar.tv/trans-pacific-partnership-bigger-and-more-dangerous-than-obamacare-video/
http://www.worldtruth.org/thelibertydefined/link-id_75757/
http://www.historyuncensored.co.uk/...gger-and-more-dangerous-than-obamacare-video/
http://rickmick.com/trans-pacific-partnership-bigger-and-more-dangerous-than-obamacare-video/
http://rinf.com/alt-news/breaking-n...gger-and-more-dangerous-than-obamacare-video/
http://barackobamavlog.wordpress.co...tpp-bigger-and-more-dangerous-than-obamacare/
http://theoldcountrychurch.com/2013...hip-bigger-and-more-dangerous-than-obamacare/
http://truthbroadcastnetwork.com/tr...gger-and-more-dangerous-than-obamacare-video/
http://thepeoplesnewz.com/trans-pacific-partnership-tpp-bigger-and-more-dangerous-than-obamacare/
http://perfectwordsintheworld.blogspot.com/2013/12/trans-pacific-partnership-tpp-bigger.html
http://deadcitizensrightssociety.wo...tpp-bigger-and-more-dangerous-than-obamacare/
http://defendressofsanity81.wordpre...jones-infowars-theres-a-war-on-for-your-mind/
http://boudicabpi.wordpress.com/201...tpp-bigger-and-more-dangerous-than-obamacare/
http://collectingmythoughts.blogspot.com/2013/12/trans-pacific-partnership.html
http://www.thenewscommenter.com/new...and-More-Dangerous-Than-ObamaCare-Video/51080
http://www.teapartynation.com/forum...Id=3355873:Comment:2731136&xg_source=activity
http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2013/12/links-121513-2.html
 
Last edited:
He does, however, support unilateral free trade, which is the host country (in this case, the US) removing tariffs, taxes, regulations, and barriers for imports/goods/services/whatever.

Free trade is fine so long as workers are paid wages comparable to the U.S. Everyone else is on their own.
 
Back
Top