The oficially **official** Vance vs. Walz "debate" thread

Brian4Liberty said:
The trial was nothing but a DNC campaign stunt. They wanted to (blatantly falsely) claim they are "fair and balanced" and that "no one is above the law". They also want to make gun control an issue, as it's the only issue they can run on besides abortion.

DNC = CCP.
Click to expand...

Guns and abortion? Check...
 
So nice that Vance and Walz agree that the Federal government should pay for childcare... :rolleyes:


(But only Vance got a follow-up from the moderator of "but how will that lower child care costs"?)
 
Anti Federalist said:
I have no idea why any GOP, or Libertarian politician for that matter, would agree to participate in these dog and pony shows any more.

They are not debates in any true sense of the word, they are nothing more than staged puppet shows designed by the Marxist media organs to generate negative sound bites and "gotchas" to be used against them.
Click to expand...

Yeah, we can ask that question forever. Evil Party vs. Stupid Party is about the best explanation I can think of at the moment.
 
sparebulb said:
This will be as interesting as a Pence/Kaine debate where you couldn't slip a feeler gauge between them when it comes to liberty issues.
Click to expand...

Vance is probably the second most anti-interventionist Senator next to Rand Paul.
 
Vance was poised, gave great answers that the American people will like and Walz was flustered throughout.

One comment I heard was that for people who are undecided, they probably all wish that the VPs in the debate were at the top of the ticket.

Vance made the point that Walz would be better than Kamala Harris... that was very persuasive I think.

Vance's weakest moment was on the abortion topic, but I'm not sure there was much more he could do with it. I think he dodged the landmines and made it through that part.
 
Vance did a good job of not totally blowing it.

It didn't matter if Walz blew it or not.

The election is mostly already decided.
 
Last edited:
When Vance actually starts fact-checking the moderators with how the 'asylum' status actually works, they get all pissy and cut to another topic. That's when I quit watching.



If it had been me on that stage, I'd have walked off and let them figure out what to do with the next hour or so of dead-air. CBS is a damned joke. Didn't even give the candidates a chance to introduce themselves before they pop a hypothetical about Israel launching a pre-emptive strike and seeing how candidates would respond. Gotta hurry up and get the most important question out of the way, I guess.
 
Last edited:
Only watched a few minutes but JD Vance is very sharp & has composure.
 
If presentation accounts for anything, Vance won hands down.

Comparison is like needing a car and you can choose between a rusted out Chevette with 300,000 miles or a very well kept Prelude with 40,000 miles.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Occam's Banana
The oficially **official** Trump vs. Harris "debate" thread
8 9 10
Replies
192
Views
23K
Occam's Banana
Occam's Banana
Occam's Banana
The oficially **official** Trump vs. Biden "debate" thread
10 11 12
Replies
237
Views
14K
Occam's Banana
Occam's Banana
PAF
Who’s Behind J. D. Vance? Is He a CIA Candidate?
Replies
15
Views
1K
unknown
unknown
Occam's Banana
***OFFICIAL*** RNC primary debate thread (Wednesday, 23 August 2023)
5 6 7
Replies
124
Views
8K
Occam's Banana
Occam's Banana
Warlord
New Hampshire Democrat Presidential Debate (8pm ET)
2
Replies
26
Views
2K
AngryCanadian
A
Back
Top