The officially **official** 2024 Election Day(s) results thread [Live Streams]

KEE4FUx.jpeg
 
I think you misunderstood me. I wasn't saying anybody had attacked Latinos. I was pointing out that Obama had attacked black men for not supporting Kamala and I was wondering if he was now going to shift his attack to Latinos.

I'm not sure who "attacked" Latinos (and apparently, they aren't, either) - but as long as Obama doesn't unironically refer to them as "Latinxs" ...

hb2Bt4S.png


But I bet people like Greg Hatfield were extremely upset about Latinos being "attacked".

And yet:





Other things equal, I suspect that, like Latinos, Arabs (whether Muslim or not) would be relatively less inclined to vote for the party of people like Greg Hatfield than for the party of people who laugh at roast-comedians.
 
I think you misunderstood me. I wasn't saying anybody had attacked Latinos. I was pointing out that Obama had attacked black men for not supporting Kamala and I was wondering if he was now going to shift his attack to Latinos.

I see. Yes, in that case, I misunderstood. :o :up:
 
guy is smoking the Jesus juice.

made me LOL....

I hope you know that 3 year letterman's account is purely satire and based on his posting of the opposite of anything resembling facts. Nothing in that tweet is factually even close to accurate but that's why it is hilarious. Some replies think the content is factual.
 
May I present, for your edification and amusement, "The Fall of Rome" plan:

...
And now, the unified hypotheses of the biggest con in history:

TPTB, mainly of the leftist, global, kleptocratic, plutocracy type, were shocked by the first election of Trump. What would he do? He threatened to jail Hillary. Would he do the same with others? How far down the rabbit hole would Trump go? What about Epstein?

So the plan was hatched. Hinder and distract Trump as much as possible. Use every lever of power available to them. Unleash chaos and anarchy. Unleash lawfare. Unleash censorship.

Now what to do if the walls were truly closing in? They still don't know what Trump will do. What if Trump gets elected again, and he has nothing to lose by going scorched earth? What to do about Epstein? The answer was likely agreed upon at that time. Implement the symbolic nuclear option. What I will call "The Fall of Rome" plan.

If America the nation is to bankrupted, ruined and dissolved anyway, it was time to beat everyone to the punch for the riches. A last ditch effort. It was time to loot like there was no tomorrow. Like vampires draining almost all of the blood from their victim, it was time to feed and leave that victim to die. Burn the place down, retreat, relax in luxury, and wait for the next opportunity in the future.

How to achieve this? There was no better candidate for the job than compromised, corrupted, immoral criminal Joe Biden. He fit the bill perfectly. Fix the primaries. Fix the election. Put Joe in power, and then start the process of draining the treasury before fleeing Rome. Let the money flow to the cronies like wine. Let the wars rage, everyone gets a cut! Spend like there is no tomorrow.

Good old Joe and family were happy to oblige. Let the looting and destruction begin! The Biden's could wet their beaks as much as they want. Just do the bidding of the western global kleptocratic plutocracy.

So, the victim is now almost bled dry. Joe has served his purpose. The next election is coming up. The cheating and the manipulation of the general election was audacious last time. It can't be repeated again. It is known and obvious. Who will be the captain of this Titanic Democrat campaign? Should they let Joe do it again? The pending loss to Trump is conceded now. No way to avoid it. So let Joe be the sacrificial lamb. But it's almost too obvious. He is senile and getting worse by the day? How could they pretend to be trying?

How about fix the primary for Joe, and switch him at the last minute with Kamala? She is an imbecile, and of no use to anyone. As a matter of fact, she is in the way of the future. She is an annoyance to all. If Joe loses a second time, she would be first in line in 2028. Nobody wants that distraction.

Thus Kamala was inserted with the purpose of losing. There would no master coordinated cheating for her. Good riddance was probably the consensus.

Now even wealthier than before, and closer to their global central government, TPTB will draw back. They expanded the idea of government power and control, which will be leveraged for the global new world order to come.

What about Trump's second term? Trump proved in his first term to be just as naïve and brainwashed as the average Fox News viewer. He was clueless about what they were up to, and what he was up against. No reason to believe it will be any different this time, and the same stymie, hinder and distract tactics can be used again to prevent any meaningful prosecutions. If worse comes to worse, there is always the escape of a long run vacation in Europe. That is the worse case scenario.

The best case scenario? Trump makes some headway reviving the victim. Let him perform a business miracle, while likely keeping the Fed money presses rolling. Bring America back to health, at least enough for the vampires to descend again for another feeding.

Rome is bankrupted and the barbarians are in control. Time for “champagne wishes and caviar dreams".

That was in no way a comprehensive look at the agendas and plans involved. Far from it. But one thing is clear today in the talking point being made by many Democrat politicians and pundits, especially Kamala and Joe.

They are using this loss to say "we lost, we will accept a peaceful transfer of power, see, the elections really are fair."

Would the TPTB and Democrats intentionally sacrifice Kamala just to make that point? It certainly is a point they are hammering now. Is it just an accident? Just happenstance? Just making lemonade from a loss with no forethought at all?
 
That was in no way a comprehensive look at the agendas and plans involved. Far from it. But one thing is clear today in the talking point being made by many Democrat politicians and pundits, especially Kamala and Joe.

They are using this loss to say "we lost, we will accept a peaceful transfer of power, see, the elections really are fair."

Would the TPTB and Democrats intentionally sacrifice Kamala just to make that point? It certainly is a point they are hammering now. Is it just an accident? Just happenstance? Just making lemonade from a loss with no forethought at all?


Rebuilding Trust: World Economic Forum Annual Meeting 2024

Toward a Technocratic Society and Global/Regional Governance
 
Last edited:
Hmmm.

"Access Denied

You don't have permission to access "http://www.weforum.org/press/2024/01/wef24-rebuilding-trust-world-economic-forum-annual-meeting-2024/" on this server."

It works using Edge browser in Private Mode, Windows 11.

I just got the same message that you reported on my iPhone.



WEFRebuilding-Trust.jpg
 
Last edited:
It works using Edge browser in Private Mode, Windows 11.

I just got the same message that you reported on my iPhone.



WEFRebuilding-Trust.jpg

Well, you can't say that TPTB did not consider that allowing Kamala to lose would help their agenda...
 
Trump’s Landslide Win: Our Analysis, With Journalist Lee Fang | SYSTEM UPDATE #363
https://rumble.com/v5mlcdh-system-update-show-363.html
{Glenn Greenwald | 06 November 2024}


CLIP from SYSTEM UPDATE #363:

Trump's Landslide Win EXPLAINED
https://rumble.com/v5mvsyk-trumps-landslide-win-explained.html
{Glenn Greenwald | 07 November 2024}


 
Last edited:
CLIP from SYSTEM UPDATE #363:

Dems Blame Latino and Black Voters For Kamala's Loss
https://rumble.com/v5mwxsz-dems-blame-latino-and-black-voters-for-kamalas-loss.html
{Glenn Greenwald | 07 November 2024}


 
Just what you want and push for with free trade and open borders.
Just what Trump will prevent.

I don't want government telling me how much it will cost and who how when to trade with, why would I want [public]private technocrats to do the same?

Your guy is surrounded by them. In fact, they are among his biggest donors. The billionaire club that he is in.

Wasn't it your guy that told Klaus what a fantastic job he was doing? Have you even looked at Peter Thiel, Vance and others connections?
 
I don't want government telling me how much it will cost and who how when to trade with, why would I want [public]private technocrats to do the same?

Your guy is surrounded by them. In fact, they are among his biggest donors. The billionaire club that he is in.

Wasn't it your guy that told Klaus what a fantastic job he was doing? Have you even looked at Peter Thiel, Vance and others connections?

I see plenty of animosity from you and others on tariffs, but where is your animosity for "free trade agreements"? Seems conspicuously absent.
 
Back
Top