The Constitution Party

[american2]

Personal attack and hijacking the thread. Anarcho-capitalism is not libertarianism? That's absurd.

You're going on ignore.

I support the freemarket as well. What you are advocating is universal anarchy - not simply in the marketplace, but everywhere.

You are the one who is making personal attacks, especially when you have a list of names in your profile you call McCain supporters, because they support limited government - something you do not support (you argue for no government), but fail to argue against.

 

[RP4EVER]

I certainly hope my post didn't give the impression that this was my sentiment!

I'm not voting for either one of them. I've pretty much decided to "throw my vote away" on a Ron Paul write-in. As far as I'm concerned, Ron Paul is my President.

Glad to know you are voting your conscious; sorry for the rude question.

JTL....no one has hijacked anything...simply daring to disagree with you.

 

[Charles Wilson]

Personal attack and hijacking the thread. Anarcho-capitalism is not libertarianism? That's absurd.

You're going on ignore.

JTL I was going to pass on this thread but after reading the above I cannot resist. Your moniker "JosephTheLibertarian" is a misnomer. To be fair and truthful it should read "JosephTheAnarchist-Libertarian".

 

[tonesforjonesbones]

I am beginning to believe that free markets isn't such a great idea. The only way it works is if the free market is MORAL. There isn't a very good chance of that. I am leaning back to Nationalism. When there was Nationalsim...protectionism...the USA was in MUCH better shape. Now...due to the so called free markets...our economy is in shambles, people are without decent paying jobs, we have no manufacturing. So, which is it ? Globalism or Soverignty? Tones

 

[JosephTheLibertarian]

JTL I was going to pass on this thread but after reading the above I cannot resist. Your moniker "JosephTheLibertarian" is a misnomer. To be fair and truthful it should read "JosephTheAnarchist-Libertarian".

You do know that I've been a member of this forum for over a year, right? And I only found out about libertarianism a few months before I found out about Ron Paul. True libertarianism is anarcho-capitalism.

 

[acptulsa]

JTL I was going to pass on this thread but after reading the above I cannot resist. Your moniker "JosephTheLibertarian" is a misnomer. To be fair and truthful it should read "JosephTheAnarchist-Libertarian".

I still prefer Joseph the Libertine. I'd love to attribute that one to the genius who coined it, but I don't have the time to search it up.

 

[Nirvikalpa]

I still prefer Joseph the Libertine. I'd love to attribute that one to the genius who coined it, but I don't have the time to search it up.

+1

I know who calls him that all the time though, don't know if he created it or not.

 

[Charles Wilson]

You do know that I've been a member of this forum for over a year, right? And I only found out about libertarianism a few months before I found out about Ron Paul. True libertarianism is anarcho-capitalism.

Anarcho-capitalism: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anarcho-capitalism. http://jim.com/anarcho-.htm. http://www.ozarkia.net/bill/anarchism/faq.html


Libertarianism: http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/libertarianism/

As a Constitutionalist I suppose I identify with both definitions

 

[G-Wohl]

You can't be a constitutionalist and an anarcho-capitalist. The Constitution advocates for more government than allotted by anarcho-capitalism.

 

[G-Wohl]

I suppose the neocon is better than someone who actively supported Ron Paul?

Bob Barr also actively supported Ron Paul, but that hasn't had much of an effect on people around here for some reason.

I am beginning to suspect that a lot of the people here supported Ron Paul because they're bible pounders, and now all those folks moved to support a fellow bible pounder. Just to remain clear: the PRINCIPLE of libertarianism should be what it's all about, and not the Theocrat charlatanry that libertarianism ALLOWS you to uphold.

Such is the philosophy of the Constitution party: Use the Constitution only to uphold your specific, politically-unaffiliated, religiously-fueled hatred and bigotry.

 

[Charles Wilson]

You can't be a constitutionalist and an anarcho-capitalist. The Constitution advocates for more government than allotted by anarcho-capitalism.

Hmmmm, I suppose I is what I is.

 

[Shotdown1027]

"You can't be a constitutionalist and an anarcho-capitalist. The Constitution advocates for more government than allotted by anarcho-capitalism."

This is patently false. Send an email to Lew Rockwell and ask him why.

The Constitution only serves to RESTRICT the Federal government, it doesnt say how large it must be, or that it must exist at all.

 

[G-Wohl]

"You can't be a constitutionalist and an anarcho-capitalist. The Constitution advocates for more government than allotted by anarcho-capitalism."

This is patently false. Send an email to Lew Rockwell and ask him why.

The Constitution only serves to RESTRICT the Federal government, it doesnt say how large it must be, or that it must exist at all.

Guys, I'm an anarcho-capitalist, so never fear! But sorry, you can't have anarcho-capitalism with a government that is Constitutionally allowed to regulate and institute a national post office.