NYgs23
Member
- Joined
- Dec 14, 2007
- Messages
- 1,753
...and we should concern ourselves with "for most," why again?
Congratulations on managing to live life completely free of all govt-controlled services.
...and we should concern ourselves with "for most," why again?
Thank you. Unfortunately, some people around here seem to want to cut off their noses to spite their faces by pretending that, under the current system, living life without utilizing govt-controlled services on some level is a viable option for most.
Who's talking about magic? Do you not see that when the govt owns the roads (or controls them or whatever you want to call it), the people who maintain the roads will be paid by the govt. What do you except? A private third-party to pay people to maintain the government's roads? The point is that the govt does control these things right now. Ipso facto, it's the only one who's going to maintain and staff these govt-controlled things.
...and then folks will stop asking for competition and start demanding it.
Well, I don't know what to think. You say that's the information they're missing, but you don't sound as if your friend is missing the information. You make it sound like he's painfully aware of this information, gets reminded every day, and puts up with it at great personal pain and disgust because he wants the public to be served by someone who is human.
And I say bravo.
And to you I not only say bravo, but I got your back. Thank you for trying to get the job done despite the fact that you have to fight the system tooth and nail to do it right.

Congratulations on managing to live life completely free of all govt-controlled services.
...and then folks will stop asking for competition and start demanding it.
If you believe that the best way to privatize education and privatize transporation is by allowing them to go to the dogs first, you must also be hoping that Bernanke inflates a whole lot and totally destroys the dollar, so that people will demand private competition. I'd prefer to avoid taking detour through the Dark Ages in order to get to freedom. Besides such a situation is just as, if not more likely to lead to more tyranny. Govt control tends to grow in the midst of misery and deprivation.
except prison, unless of course you anarchs are all talk and no action, which I suspect is the case.

Which "services" are you thinking of specifically?
Is your stance that you don't agree with public schools, etc., but that as long as they exist, you're one person who is trying to make them the best they can be?
Why? There are still real life people on the "other" side of the computer. Why would you, meaning everyone, not talk to them like you do someone in the bar?
I don't get it...
You frame it as though this is a bad thing... I wish folks were more direct in real life like they are on the internet.
point of order, I don't think anyone is saying that maintain roads is a function of government unsupported by the constitution. Tho it should be states that pay for this. The federal govt has no business in schools.
"you anarchs"???
Are they all the same? Because, quite frankly, I have seen quite a lot of difference in each person's opinion and manner. At least on this forum.

i say one thing, you quote it and then say some completely irrelevant garbage... i don't get it. (well, i do actually get it.)
I have yet to find an anarch that doesnt live completely in unyielding theory. When I do, Ill be sure to make the distinction![]()

Compare the forums, not to a 1 on 1 conversation, but to 30 people all trying to have their say. I think in this case you will find that the forums are MORE civilized than a flesh to flesh group of people would be based on what we are talking about, but that could also be because of our common goals and desires. Anyways I was trying to point out the differences of group conversation vs. two people talking, not advocating treating people badly just because they are behind a computer.
You can still be direct in a respectful manner. A lot of threads here seem to degrade into nothing but insults. It's been pointed out that members have left because of this. I just don't see how that is constructive.
Well, my experience in general is different. I think a lot of posters hind behind their anonymity and are LESS civilized. I know if I was responded to in the manner a lot of posters here do, I wouldn't listen to another word they said..even though they may convince me.