Rush defending 'Open Marriage' now?

I really wish Republicans would have cut Mark Sanford this much slack! It must have been his non-interventionist views that were verbotin, and not his infidelity.
 
black-money-dollar-animated.gif
LOLZ!!!!
 
His latest wife, yes. I feel bad for the woman that grabs Newt's keys.

LMAO. I cannot believe this. This is common knowledge?

The GOP voters have really changed if they are behind a candidate with these types of lifestyle tastes. Even thinking about him in that regard makes me want to vomit. At least he doesn't hide it. I can't even imagine what circles of people he congregates with. I am as open as they come, but that is just gross....
 
Hannity didn't go this route today, but it was as disgusting. He actually had the ability to say with a straight face that ABC was biased and looking for "gotcha" stories in stead of looking for real news and the issues....*cough* newsletters *cough*.....

Said, that's why FOX news is so great...."We don't do that....we are not biased". :rolleyes:
 
Can we just admit Rush is worse than a whore? At least a whore is honest and virtually no one is harmed during the transaction of goods. Rush whores for millions of dead bodies and the theft of hardworking people's paychecks.

 
Last edited:
Good for Hitler about being open about the fact that he hated Jews before he slaughtered them!
 
On my way in to work this afternoon I happened to flip through the dials and land on Rush, just in time to hear him defending Newt, saying he was a victim of the 'most horny generation' ever, and 'good for him that he was honest enough to ask for an open marriage, that's a mark of character in my book...'

Seriously? Anyone have a clip of this? The hypocrisy of these shills is going off the charts this time...

You are right. I was travelling and I heard him spout it out and I turned the dial, I couldnt stomach it anymore. Seriously, someone stick a fork in him he's done and the GOP is not far behind him.
 
Rush is just another fake conservative trying to herd the people.

Rush will defend a Party before he showed in principles of limited government and conservatism.

Newt is a power hungry whack job.

Rush was the real deal a long time ago. He mentioned talking about believing in things the JBS and Ron Paul have espoused, when he first started out in the radio biz. There is an interview floating around which discusses this. But he sold out.
 
Last edited:
Limbaugh wasn't always a propaganda whore. It's amazing what wheel barrows of money can make a person do:

http://www.jbs.org/jbs-news-feed/limbaugh-s-goal-making-money


It wasn’t always this way with Limbaugh. Before he became a household word, he searched hard for a way to make a name for himself. While hosting a show on a single Kansas City station in 1975, he developed admiration for a John Birch Society program he’d seen. “I saw the film Overview and it got into my head for six months and they had me believing this stuff.” But the view promoted by the Birch Society, applauded by increasing numbers of concerned Americans, wasn’t politically correct. So Limbaugh began attacking the Society and its carefully presented claim about conspiracy. His stock then rose dramatically with the people who have provided him air time and the opportunity to become a millionaire.
 
The most important elements of the story has been overlooked in this thread... that Newt had this "open marriage" conversation with his wife AFTER the infidelity was discovered.

So, yes, he was a cheater first and THEN said "accept it or divorce me".
 
Rush was the real deal a long time ago. He mentioned talking about believing in things the JBS and Ron Paul have espoused, when he first started out in the radio biz. There is an interview floating around which discusses this. But he sold out.

A quarter of a billion dollar radio contract buys a lot, doesn't it?
 
Can I play the devil's advocate?

We defend both inter-racial marriage and homosexual marriages in this country. What would the difference be with an open marriage if both parties agree to it?
 
Can I play the devil's advocate?

We defend both inter-racial marriage and homosexual marriages in this country. What would the difference be with an open marriage if both parties agree to it?

It's not the marriage.

Newt can marry his dog for all I care.

It's the hypocrisy to hold himself up as some pious defender of "social values" while being a reprobate, that has people like me worked up.

That and the fact that "bible belt" Christian Zionists fall for it.
 
Can I play the devil's advocate?

We defend both inter-racial marriage and homosexual marriages in this country. What would the difference be with an open marriage if both parties agree to it?

Are we or are we not assuming that one of the parties goes around earning millions of dollars in speaking fees giving talks about the sanctity of traditional marriage?
 
Can I play the devil's advocate?

We defend both inter-racial marriage and homosexual marriages in this country. What would the difference be with an open marriage if both parties agree to it?

Because it's not a conservative principle, and Rush paints himself as the most excellent conservative.

I have no problem with people having open marriages. I would never do it, but people can do whatever the hell they want to. That's not the point. The point is that Rush is saying it isn't a big deal if Newt does it, when if it were a Democrat, he'd be all over it. Not to mention Newt signed that fidelity pledge or whatever.
 
Back
Top