Ron Paul on Meet the Press (12/11/11)

From DP

Whoo!
Submitted by SpaceCowboy on Sun, 12/11/2011 - 10:10.

"All my opponents defend the status quo" - Ron Paul

RP is simply not going to give David Gregory the answers Gregory is trying to extract.
Submitted by Zachnap Ω™ on Sun, 12/11/2011 - 10:19.

Douche: "Are you ruling-out a third-party run?"

Ron Paul: "Why out of all the candidates would I need to consider a third party run? Why are you even asking me this question? Maybe you need to ask Perry, Santorum, Bachmann, etc... We are in a position to win the nomination. End of story."

They keep trying to put into everyone's mind that Paul isn't going to get the nomination and everyone knows it so lets frame the discussion as if Paul is going to end-up running thrid party.

My mother supports Paul but keeps trying to repeat this BS that she thinks he is going to run third party.

The mind control is absolutely ridiculous. All they have to do is repeat this talking point over and over and people accept it as a given.
Dr. Paul ROCKED!
Submitted by freddiel on Sun, 12/11/2011 - 10:18.

He did a fantastic job of answering all the questions. DG kept trying to get him to say which of the 2 (Newt/Romney) he thought was the most consistent conservative and RP refused to give him the answer he was looking for. He did a great job. I was very impressed!
Submitted by Zachnap Ω™ on Sun, 12/11/2011 - 10:24.

He is trying to frame the discussion with subliminal messaging to the audience. "Paul has a lot of support, but he isn't going to get the nomination so I hope he supports the party."

This isn't an admittance of strength it is mind-control propaganda. Seriously, it is mind-control. That might sound outlandish but that is exactly what it is. He is making the subliminal implication that Paul isn't going to get the nomination. The people watching say to themselves: "Yeah, Paul isn't going to get the nomination, hopefully his supporters jump on-board to defeat Obama. I'm voting for Newt."
 
Governor Terry Branstad brought Paul up multiple times in a positive light. Also heard one of the panel guests bring up Paul's debate point about the people we're leaving in Iraq.
 
Then the Closet Liberal Senator Lindsey Graham, begging Ron Paul supports the rigged GOP charade to beat Obama to swing the same ole dictatorship pendulum back to the right.
 
Ron is getting really good at handling these crappy interviewers.
 
bullshit interview. spent the whole time asking about newt-romney and didnt get to any issues. fuck abc and nbc
 
I AM SO TIRED OF THE MSM.

If the average American cannot see what the MSM is trying to push they are straight up as stupid as they come.

Graham comes on right after Paul saying that it is okay to be a flip flopper and we support establishment 100%....so tired of this country and their B.S. "free elections"
 
Lindsey Graham followed up Dr. Paul, and he looks absolutely sick at the possibility of an ascendant Ron Paul.

I laughed.

Out Loud.
 
Lindsey Graham channeling Peter Schiff...

jeez...



If an idea's viability is based on the fruits it bears and the people that gravitate toward it, isn't it clear that government is a completely psychotic idea?
 
If he isn't with the campaign any more, what makes his threads "official?"

angela there has always been sarcasm in the official and unofficial threads. so either one is just folks being sarcastic at many levels!! There has never been an official or unofficial threads officially;)
 
There was a Ron Paul PWNS moment when asked if he could support any of the candidates. He said it would depend on the platform and if the candidate would change their views. They proved they are willing to change their views as they have done so in the past lol. It was a nice subtle jab.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Cap
This was a pure psyop piece.

Ugh, this interview was absolutely retarded!

All the questions were about Newt and Mitt, and then they end with a 'will you endorse if you lose' preceding it with the 'strong following' smear, and finishing off pushing him hard on the third party question, preceding it with the 'you have endorsed a Libertarian candidate in the past' smear.

This interview was worse than Tim Russert's hit piece last election cycle. Ron answered the questions well though, considering.
 
Back
Top