Chosen
Banned
- Joined
- Feb 7, 2008
- Messages
- 769
Because that would be a crime that could have been prevented if the law had been upheld. This is the point. You may not like to see it thrown in your face, but every crime committed by an illegal alien could have been prevented. In fact, when the Border Patrol ran an operation in El Paso Texas in the 90's called Operation Hold the Line, where they decided to actually enforce the law, violent crime in El Paso dropped 80%. For some reason the "study/exercise" was then dropped and not funded? Why? Because it also meant that there was a substantial reduction in illegal immigrants coming across the borders.No it is not, it's the same nonsense you posted over an illegal immigrant killing a person. What's the difference if a person without permission(U.S. government permission) kills a person and a natural born citizen who kills somebody?
None, they should be both tried.
Crimes committed by illegal aliens are crimes which could be prevented if the rule of law is upheld.