Sauron
Banned
- Joined
- Jan 17, 2008
- Messages
- 415
It's more than a win. Ron Paul is the only candidate that any Louisiana delegates will commit their vote to.
Repeat after me: Ron Paul won Louisiana.
- Thread starter acptulsa
- Start date
billyjoeallen
Member
- Joined
- Dec 25, 2007
- Messages
- 921
Ron Paul DID win in Louisiana.
Dark_Horse_Rider
Member
- Joined
- Jan 17, 2008
- Messages
- 2,346
Ron Paul Wins
Carole
Member
- Joined
- Nov 8, 2007
- Messages
- 5,035
Excuse me, but does he not still have to win 51% of the vote on primary day.
Otherwise the delegates are not committed to vote for him.
It could be Mevada all over again. Remember Hillary and Romney both got "EXACTLY" 51% by some strange method or manipulation, so they are guaranteed all the delegates on the first ballot.
Do NOT quit yet, it is not yet over in Lousiana until Dr. Paul gets the majority. Romney and McCain will be bussing in voters to steal the win!!
Please correct me if I am wrong.
Otherwise the delegates are not committed to vote for him.
It could be Mevada all over again. Remember Hillary and Romney both got "EXACTLY" 51% by some strange method or manipulation, so they are guaranteed all the delegates on the first ballot.
Do NOT quit yet, it is not yet over in Lousiana until Dr. Paul gets the majority. Romney and McCain will be bussing in voters to steal the win!!
Please correct me if I am wrong.
ronpaulfollower999
Member
- Joined
- Nov 18, 2007
- Messages
- 5,874
Ron won.
shadowhooch
Member
- Joined
- Jul 23, 2007
- Messages
- 641
Hell if we can't understand it, Joe Schmo won't understand it.
Ron Paul won Louisiana. Woohoo!!!!
Ron Paul won Louisiana. Woohoo!!!!
Dr.3D
Member
- Joined
- Dec 6, 2007
- Messages
- 30,314
Weee... Ron Paul won Louisiana!!! Weeee....
http://www.threebrain.com/weeeeee.shtml
Weeeeeeeeee......
acptulsa
Member
- Joined
- Jan 2, 2008
- Messages
- 75,503
You are not wrong. You are correct, ma'am. We appreciate your diligence.
When you hear someone say our man can't win, however, I am strongly recomending that you repeat after me:
Our man beat every other single candidate. Ron Paul won in Louisiana.
ShowMeLiberty
Member
- Joined
- Nov 3, 2007
- Messages
- 2,257
Ron Paul Won Louisiana!
maiki
Member
- Joined
- Jun 8, 2007
- Messages
- 334
Look, this is nice and all, but give me a link from a credible source (Even Ron Paul 2008!) that says: RP has more votes than any other candidate in Louisiana. I'll settle for wikitruth, if I can reference it, it is true. If I need to do legwork to prove it, it is not.
Ron Paul didn't win Louisiana. To be fair, nobody has won Louisiana.
Basically, because the republican party apparently can't do anything simply, what happens is this. On 22 January, the party held district caucuses for delegates for the state convention.
On 9 February, the people will vote, and if anyone gets over 50% of the vote, then all 20 delegates are bound to the winner.
On 16 February , the state convention will determine:
1. If the 20 delegates (At large) are to be bound to anyone based on preference at the Feb 9 vote.
2. If the 21 delegates from the 7 districts (3 each) are to be bound based on preference at the Feb 9 vote.
3. Three at large delegates, and if they are to be bound based on preference of the Feb 9 vote
4. Who those 44 delegates are. The party leadership then adds in three more delegates.
So, nothing has been done in LA. Nothing at all, really. The entire damn caucus thing seems to really be a waste.
maiki
Member
- Joined
- Jun 8, 2007
- Messages
- 334
I know that.
That is what I meant. People are just speculating on a non-binding procedure. Feb. 9th is too far away. 
goldstandard
Member
- Joined
- Jun 16, 2007
- Messages
- 699
stevedasbach
Member
- Joined
- Jun 23, 2007
- Messages
- 1,392
It isn't resolved yet. Right now, what they would report would be that we got beat by the pro-life pro-family slate. Wait until the provisional ballots are counted. Depending on how things come out, that will be the time to make whatever hay we can out of Louisiana.
UtahApocalypse
Member
- Joined
- May 11, 2007
- Messages
- 6,991
I also have heard everyone bitching about the "Pro/Life" thing yet have seen ZERO, NADDA, ZILTCH of proof it was a effort of the other campaigns.
Seriously people Ron Paul stands for integrity and we need to follow that and quit accusations without basis.
Seriously people Ron Paul stands for integrity and we need to follow that and quit accusations without basis.
Wait... I'm sorry for being so slow guys but could someone please explain to me the situation?
Did we get more than any other candidate?
Did the other candidates through some ass backwards law band their support together and beat us?
How does this affect the delegates?
Did we get more than any other candidate?
Did the other candidates through some ass backwards law band their support together and beat us?
How does this affect the delegates?
Ethek
Member
- Joined
- Nov 9, 2007
- Messages
- 2,524
If you repeat something in the media enough times it becomes true. I thought everyone knew this already!
No. NO candidate got more than any other candidate, since candidates weren't being chosen. Nothing binds the people who were elected as delegates to vote for ANY candidate in the state convention.
No. The other candidates didn't do anything through some backwards law. They legitimately ran a set of delegate candidates on a joined slate called "Pro Family/Pro Life".
The delegates are now elected to attend the state convention on February 16th where they will select the 44 delegates to the national convention.
They are not currently bound by any law or GOP rule to any candidate. If a candidate gets over 50% of the vote on Feb 9, then 20 National Candidates would be bound to that candidate.
Similar threads
