...Really? [corrected]

[JJ2]

Hancock had 36 votes for Ron Paul in 2008: http://www.boston.com/news/politics/2008/nh/nh_primary_gop_results_by_town/

 

[TimeForChange]

this needs to be investigated and exposed while the momentum is in full swing

 

[Havax]

Here's another interesting result:

Keene, NH:

Romney: 33%
Hunstman: 23%
Paul: 22%

Really Keene? C'mon "free-staters" wtf?

Anyway, does anyone know if there's a breakdown by town for '08? Might be useful to compare Hancock '08 if that's available.

Not many free staters in numbers. Even amongst them I imagine there are a lot of anarchists who are philosophically opposed to voting and/or stubborn enough to have voted for Gary.

 

[TimeForChange]

maybe a newspaper from the area can investigate. Anyone live near this town?

 

[UNC08]

Hancock had 36 votes for Ron Paul in 2008: http://www.boston.com/news/politics/2008/nh/nh_primary_gop_results_by_town/

This is the best bit of evidence.

Seriously, someone could just call a government building in that place tomorrow and find out who counted the votes. Simply ask them if there were any RP votes. It'd be easy.

 

[TheNewYorker]

Hancock had 36 votes for Ron Paul in 2008: http://www.boston.com/news/politics/2008/nh/nh_primary_gop_results_by_town/

So we're supposed to believe that in 2008, when Ron Paul only got 7% of the vote in NH, he got 36 votes in Hancock (a place named after a founding father, anarchist and revolutionary) but in 2012, when Ron Paul garnered over 23% of the total vote in NH, he gets 0 votes in Hancock?

THIS IS OBVIOUS FRAUD and needs to be investigated.

 

[UNC08]

http://www.hancocknh.org/

I believe this is there gov't site. I'm sure finding out first hand would be easy. I'd do it, but I'm shy...

 

[Karsten]

Not many free staters in numbers. Even amongst them I imagine there are a lot of anarchists who are philosophically opposed to voting and/or stubborn enough to have voted for Gary.

Sometimes I hate anarchists. I thought the point of picking NH for the FSP was partially because of it being the first primary, therefore state politics are very influential on national politics.

 

[ByeByeBernanke]

Something is wrong here

 

[Tyler_Durden]

So we're supposed to believe that in 2008, when Ron Paul only got 7% of the vote in NH, he got 36 votes in Hancock (a place named after a founding father, anarchist and revolutionary) but in 2012, when Ron Paul garnered over 23% of the total vote in NH, he gets 0 votes in Hancock?

THIS IS OBVIOUS FRAUD and needs to be investigated.

I counted 440 total votes in 2008.

Hancock had 36 votes for Ron Paul in 2008: http://www.boston.com/news/politics/2008/nh/nh_primary_gop_results_by_town/

 

[gerryb]

Sometimes I hate anarchists. I thought the point of picking NH for the FSP was partially because of it being the first primary, therefore state politics are very influential on national politics.

Libertarians are just as bad.

There's 25,000 of them registered in Iowa.

You would think if you go through the effort to join a party that isn't mainstream, you would make an effort to vote in the most important election in the nation?

 

[Giuliani was there on 911]

wow

 

[JJ2]

Someone posted on another thread that the Union Leader site does give Paul 83 votes for Hancock: http://www.unionleader.com/section/news0608 (under Hillsborough County)

 

[RonPaulwillWin]

For the greater good.

 

[moonbat]

I just submitted it as a news tip at WMUR. Maybe they will look in to it.

 

[Korey Kaczynski]

Wow, just watched this video. Wave of nostalgia.

 

[jersdream]

I find it odd Ron only got 14% in Hanover too, with Huntsman killing it there...Huntsman strong holds...Paul does significantly worse...hmmm

 

[GunnyFreedom]

Libertarians are just as bad.

There's 25,000 of them registered in Iowa.

You would think if you go through the effort to join a party that isn't mainstream, you would make an effort to vote in the most important election in the nation?

Geeze...that woulda blown away Iowa...

 

[jersdream]

Geeze...that woulda blown away Iowa...

Wow . And they could have registered on caucus night....and changed back right away. 4,000 of them registering and voting would have won us Iowa. 10k would have been a blowout.

 

[TheNcredibleEgg]

Ok, easily explained.

See - the officials there are just being pro-active. They've arrested all those hippie, pot-smoking indecent Americans and indefinitely detained them using the NDAA as soon as they cast a vote for Ron Paul - thereby nullifying their vote.