Rand Paul on The Laura Ingraham Show 4/28

Dude gives his location as a cell number, but thinks the state isn't repressive.

The cognitive dissonance is astonishing.

"The occupation should be continued until the violence stops, then the occupation can end peacefully."

Y'all sound like McCain.

Sounds like your advocating armed rebellion, which is something as a Christian I can't support.
 
Dude gives his location as a cell number, but thinks the state isn't repressive.

The cognitive dissonance is astonishing.

"The occupation should be continued until the violence stops, then the occupation can end peacefully."

Y'all sound like McCain.
When did I say the state isn't repressive?
 
I understand the sentiment, but some of them have shown a disrespect for private property. That has to be weighed into the equation. I would venture that the majority of them are not "anti-state" at all...in fact quite the opposite.

Maybe they should be burning down the police department and the court house?
 
Wow, this is incredible. People here are actually defending gangs of thugs who are destroying the private property of their neighbors?
So, its ok to steal and burn peoples stuff, as long as you are not the "state"? That sounds like the popular culture definition of anarchy, playing right into their hands.
 
Wow, this is incredible. People here are actually defending gangs of thugs who are destroying the private property of their neighbors?
So, its ok to steal and burn peoples stuff, as long as you are not the "state"? That sounds like the popular culture definition of anarchy, playing right into their hands.

You must spread some Reputation around before giving it to William Tell again.
 
The thugs in Baltimore wish Obama and Federal Agents could kill any libertarian or conservative white person they could get their hands on.

I doubt if any of them care about all the non-white and non-black people killed by Obama's policies.

They'd love a swat raid on anyone who bought the so called Ron Paul Newsletter and anyone accused of using the N-Word ever. Anyone who questions the Civil Rights Act would get a SWAT raid as well.

Also the same type of people were making death threats against the people who did the affirmative action ballot measure in Michigan.

Lorretta Lynch, Eric Holder and Obama are far bigger lawman thugs than any cop out there

Sadly, you may be right. Undoing that many years of indoctrination is probably impossible.
 
Wow, this is incredible. People here are actually defending gangs of thugs who are destroying the private property of their neighbors?
So, its ok to steal and burn peoples stuff, as long as you are not the "state"? That sounds like the popular culture definition of anarchy, playing right into their hands.

"You must spread some Reputation around before giving it to William Tell again."

Yup, it's amazing how often that happens...

When it comes right down to it, for a great many self-ascribed anarcho-capitalists, anarcho-capitalism is not a well-reasoned political philosophy based on respect for property rights, etc - it's just juvenile, anti-authority chest-thumping. This species of anarcho-capitalist has more in common with the black-masked left-anarchist idiots than he may realize.
 
If a 'protester' trashed idiom's car and burned his house he would spend exactly zero time justifying the people violating his property rights.
 
"You must spread some Reputation around before giving it to William Tell again."

Yup, it's amazing how often that happens...

When it comes right down to it, for a great many self-ascribed anarcho-capitalists, anarcho-capitalism is not a well-reasoned political philosophy based on respect for property rights, etc - it's just juvenile, anti-authority chest-thumping. This species of anarcho-capitalist has more in common with the black-masked left-anarchist idiots than he may realize.
You must spread some Reputation around before giving it to r3volution 3.0 again.

If a 'protester' trashed idiom's car and burned his house he would spend exactly zero time justifying the people violating his property rights.
He also wouldn't have leg to stand on telling them what they're doing is wrong. After all who knows what kind of "oppression" they've been undergoing or who knows perhaps they are impoverished and desperate and have no other choice.
 
If a 'protester' trashed idiom's car and burned his house he would spend exactly zero time justifying the people violating his property rights.

Rioters should just scream "Death to the state" its like an anarchist version of "for the children". It makes everything OK. Of course, most of these rioters are almost certainly communists who are just a little ticked at the enforcement arm of the machine they want expanded. But hey, who cares about that?

The enemy of one of your current enemies has to be your friend. We saw how wonderfully this worked out with the french revolution, it was a happy daisy stateless society with liberty and justice for all in a matter of days after they overthrew King Louis. And chopped up his wife and family, and all the other kingsuckers. Oh, wait....:rolleyes:
 
Y'all sound like McCain.

Well, dang. I didn't want to sound like McCain.
On the bright side though, I don't think I sound at all like Karl Marx. The bourgeoisie is the problem, right? The victorious peasants will make everything equatable again. It always works that way, doesn't it? Just look at China and Soviet Russia!
 
Dude gives his location as a cell number, but thinks the state isn't repressive.

The cognitive dissonance is astonishing.

"The occupation should be continued until the violence stops, then the occupation can end peacefully."

Y'all sound like McCain.

The issue isn't whether or not our government is repressive/oppressive, it clearly is to anyone with half a brain. The issue is whether or not mindless destruction is an appropriate response, and it isn't in case you are confused on that point. Forming a mob and breaking and burning random stuff is actually a good way to justify even more repression, which leads me to question why you would be sanctioning it if you have bothered to think this stuff through.

If you want to talk about cognitive dissonance, try taking a little stroll down into Baltimore and voice your support for the people acting themselves a fool right now, and let's see how long it is before somebody beats your face to a pulp for being the wrong color in the wrong neighborhood.
 
Rioters should just scream "Death to the state" its like an anarchist version of "for the children". It makes everything OK. Of course, most of these rioters are almost certainly communists who are just a little ticked at the enforcement arm of the machine they want expanded. But hey, who cares about that?

The enemy of one of your current enemies has to be your friend. We saw how wonderfully this worked out with the french revolution, it was a happy daisy stateless society with liberty and justice for all in a matter of days after they overthrew King Louis. And chopped up his wife and family, and all the other kingsuckers. Oh, wait....:rolleyes:
Great point. +rep
 
What the hell is wrong with you?

I'm not going to support anyone who is looting and burning someone else's private property. That isn't what our movement is about. Just the damn opposite.

Who has funded the police department and the war on drugs and the war on poverty and the local zoning boards for the last 40 years?

Oh right, those private property owners.

Or does responsibility for your actions not apply to taxpayers?

If you pay your local government to maintain an underclass, you are to blame when the underclass has a tantrum.
 
Sounds like your advocating armed rebellion, which is something as a Christian I can't support.

If I was advocating armed rebellion I wouldn't be here.

But I can understand the position of those who do.

Also the book of judges is largely God engineering one armed rebellion after another.

Sometimes God anoints assassins. Sometimes he anoints guerilla leaders.
 
Back
Top