What a mature start to your post....
This guy phrases his question with, "We know you're playing politics, but tell us...." and you expect Rand to submit to a taped conversation with someone like that?? knowing full well the bias intent of the guy who will control the selective editing of the video?
What selective editing of the video - I haven't noticed any selective editing on any of the videos? Perhaps you could point out evidence for this claim before making accusations.
I'm pretty indifferent to the whole 'truth movement', I don't particularly follow the whole Alex Jones-Bildeberger saga. I'm more interested in Austrian Economics and the philosophy of liberty than the "IT'S A CONSPIRACY!" side. I don't have anything against them, in fact, I feel that they're an ally.
I fail to see, though, the harm in WeAreChange and Alex Jones, nor do I feel that they have any alterior motive. I think that Luke Radowski (sp?) is merely a college kid with a camera trying to make a name for himself in a field that he's passionate about. He hasn't violated the non-agression principle, so what's the problem? In fact, suggesting that he has a 'bias intent' seems pretty similar to those who cry "Conspiracy!".
Plus, Rand has already talked to this guy several times
Has he? There's that brief video from two years ago, but I can't find any other ones. I'm happy to be corrected so perhaps you would post the videos to support the claim that they've conversed "several times".
and knows full well the attack mode that he, Kokesh and Alex Jones are all in.
Laughable. No offence but to say Adam Kokesh is in an 'attack mode' is ridiculous. You don't think politicians should be held to account? You don't think it's okay to disagree with Rand's endorsement? Get rid of the emotive language, Adam Kokesh eloquently presented his distaste with Rand. It's not an 'attack' to disagree with someone. I don't know about WeAreChange other than this video but I'll agree with you that Alex Jones seems in a bit of an attack mode - he seems to have gone out his way to blaming everyone and anyone, including Ron Paul himself, for this endorsement and overstate his outrage and generally kick up more of a fuss than it's worth.
Also, I don't see how you can group Adam Kokesh in with Alex Jones and WeAreChange. Adam has a completely different style and the subject which he focuses on is completely different. Adam Kokesh isn't a truther, he's an ancap (not mutually exclusive, I know, but the content of Adam Versus The Man is about the voluntarist philosophy and current affairs, not the "exposing the NWO"). In fact, I would suggest that Adam is more comparable to Stefan Molyneux and the folks at FreeTalkLive than Alex Jones and WeAreChange.
Folks, hate to break it to you, but there is a whole industry making money in the conspiracy peddling world. Don't get me wrong, I enjoy listening to Coast to Coast AM as much as the next guy, but don't form your world view from these people.
Well, thanks for the words of wisdom o wise sage.
If you want to engage in the political process to advocate for rule-of-law and constitutional principles, take note: Distancing yourself from people motivated purely by pushing a grand conspiracy narrative intersecting all aspects of life, will be one of the wisest things you'll ever do.
....and support those who endorse tyranny? I'm no conspiracy theorist, but that doesn't mean I find them anything but harmless. Slightly deluded, a bit caught up and gullible - yes - but at least they don't try and deny me my right to self-ownership. The same cannot be said for policians like Rand and Romney.
If you think these guys should be leading a political movement, you probably need a very long vacation.
I think you should take a vacation yourself - to
PorcFest where you can meet Adam and air your complaints to his face. Btw, he is a reasonable gent who enjoys debate so don't be put off by his arms.
