Putin The Guilty

[TheTexan]

 

[TheTexan]

For [MENTION=65299]Swordsmyth[/MENTION] [MENTION=65529]Sammy[/MENTION]

 

[TheTexan]

https://rairfoundation.com/journali...-grateful-russia-finally-did-something-video/

 

[ClaytonB]

Updated:

 

[TheTexan]

(be sure to turn on English captions)

 

[sparebulb]

(be sure to turn on English captions)

It would only matter if these were transgendered children.

All Boobus sees here is miniature Russians.

 

[Anti Federalist]

Has nothing to do with a memory hole. None of that has anything to do with what's going on now.


It's the international equivalent of saying "oh that guy that the police unlawfully killed was convicted of some drug crimes a decade ago so it's okay. He was no angel."

No it's not.

When the entire western world's media organs pivot, on command, with the precision of Bull Halsey's Third Fleet, to a position 180 degrees opposite of what it was just a week ago, something fucky is going on.

And the more I dig into this, the more fucky it becomes...certainly fucky enough to say I want no part of it, and want no US military involvement.

But if even only a part of the "US Supported Bio-Weapon Labs in Ukraine" and "Bloodthirsty Nazi Militias Running Amok in Ukraine" stories are true, those, along with the aggressive courting of Ukraine by NATO right on Russia's border, is, right or wrong, more than enough provocation for Putin to make a move and try and clean house.

If we did not have a government almost universally composed of Quislings, traitors and anti-American Marxist filth, a government that gave just the slightest fuck about the good of the nation and the American people, we'd be doing the same thing to Mexico right now.

 

[Sammy]

For @Swordsmyth @Sammy

+rep
He sounds absolutely based.

 

[Krugminator2]

Whether or not a country is corrupt by American standards should be unrelated to whether or not that country is allowed to exist.


The implication otherwise is that the United States should just be able to decide that a country is insufficiently worthy of sovereignty and borders, and declare it void.

Which, by the way, is what is ongoing in Ukraine. There is an ongoing debate as to whether or not Ukraine is a country, and one side of that debate wasn't succeeding with words so they decided to try using tanks instead.

I disagree. An unfree country has no right to exist. It is a sliding scale. It doesn't mean if Japan is less free than the United States it wouldn't make it legitimate to overthrow the government. But certainly Cuba, Russia, North Korea Iran, Saudi Arabia, Venezuela are illegitimate states. The only question that matters is if it is in the rational self interest of a free country to overthrow those governments.

 

[TheTexan]

I disagree. An unfree country has no right to exist. It is a sliding scale. It doesn't mean if Japan is less free than the United States it wouldn't make it legitimate to overthrow the government. But certainly Cuba, Russia, North Korea Iran, Saudi Arabia, Venezuela are illegitimate states. The only question that matters is if it is in the rational self interest of a free country to overthrow those governments.

Why is Russia any more of an illegitimate state than the US ?

 

[69360]

Think Putin is guilty, a war criminal, mass murderer etc? Look at the numbers so far 500 civilian deaths, but 2.5 MILLION civilians have left the country. This strikes me as a cautious military action. The western media has blown this so far out of proportion. This isn't me condoning what Russia has done, just telling you to question what you are being told.

 

[acptulsa]

Why is Russia any more of an illegitimate state than the US ?

I guess he figures the U.S. was grandfathered into legitimacy.

 

[GlennwaldSnowdenAssanged]

Putin is always demonized as being ex-KGB. Wasn't Bush head of CIA? Wasn't the USSR equivalent to CIA the KGB?

 

[sparebulb]

Putin is always demonized as being ex-KGB. Wasn't Bush head of CIA? Wasn't the USSR equivalent to CIA the KGB?

Cool it with the logical comparisons.

 

[CCTelander]

Putin is always demonized as being ex-KGB. Wasn't Bush head of CIA? Wasn't the USSR equivalent to CIA the KGB?

As long as your point is that both should be equally demonized for heading ruthless, murderous spy agencies, then to that extent I agree wholeheartedly.

If it's just another "He did it too" attempt, especially considering almost nobody around here holds Bush in high regard, epic fail.

 

[GlennwaldSnowdenAssanged]

As long as your point is that both should be equally demonized for heading ruthless, murderous spy agencies, then to that extent I agree wholeheartedly.

If it's just another "He did it too" attempt, especially considering almost nobody around here holds Bush in high regard, epic fail.

It is more about the hypocrisy.

 

[CCTelander]

It is more about the hypocrisy.

But if those demonizing Putin DON'T hold Bush in high regard, there is no hypocrisy. And like I said, you'd be hard pressed to find anyone here who holds Bush in high regard.

 

[GlennwaldSnowdenAssanged]

But if those demonizing Putin DON'T hold Bush in high regard, there is no hypocrisy. And like I said, you'd be hard pressed to find anyone here who holds Bush in high regard.

I certainly don't like the Bush's.
What POTUS do you hold in high regard?

 

[CCTelander]

I certainly don't like the Bush's.
What POTUS do you hold in high regard?

Being an an-cap I don't really hold any politicians in that high a regard, but if I had to pick a couple of presidents who weren't TOO horrible, Coolidge and Jefferson come to mind.

 

[GlennwaldSnowdenAssanged]

Being an an-cap I don't really hold any politicians in that high a regard, but if I had to pick a couple of presidents who weren't TOO horrible, Coolidge and Jefferson come to mind.

Coolidge was going to be my pick.