NIU Students for Liberty
Member
- Joined
- Aug 25, 2011
- Messages
- 1,691
dat rhetoric
And its your apologetic "he loved his country" rhetoric that is responsible for these mad men coming into power in the first place.
dat rhetoric
I don't think he's as evil as people are making him out to be. I truly think he loved/loves this Country and respected the hell out of the Office in which he held.
With something this large scale, and with this many people involved, it gets kind of tricky.
First of all, in 2000, Bush was telling people he'd actually roll back on the foreign policy front, so they didn't vote for him knowing he'd commit murder (Well, maybe some did, but most didn't.)
Second of all, as Cajun says, a lot of people are ignorant.
And then there's "Lesser of evils" and all that jazz.
So, its complicated, and to some extent it depends on what you know. But I could never encourage someone to vote for someone like that. If someone came to me and felt guilty that they voted for Bush, I wouldn't try to make them feel better about it. I'd encourage them to do different next time.
Also, if I vote for Rand am I a thief? Since taxation is theft and Rand isn't trying to abolish ALL taxes? I don't think so.
And its your apologetic "he loved his country" rhetoric that is responsible for these mad men coming into power in the first place.
It's your kind of rhetoric that causes Presidents to get assassinated.
It's your kind of rhetoric that causes Presidents to get assassinated.
That's a really unethical statement that implies a restriction in freedom of speech and worse, the responsibility of gross actions against others, when one is simply disagreeing.
So much for liberty, eh.
That's a really unethical statement that implies a restriction in freedom of speech and worse, the responsibility of gross actions against others, when one is simply disagreeing.
So much for liberty, eh.
I don't think you should get thrown in prison for your disgusting and unclassy rhetoric, but you should certainly be called out for it. That's part of my freedom of speech.
Truth hurts at times.And no, you aren't simply "disagreeing." I disagree with Bush and have called him a terrible President. But saying that Bush was a mass murderer just as evil as Adolf Hitler is definitely not just "disagreeing."
I haven't noticed anyone holding back when it comes to criticism of Obama (and that's as it should be).
Truth hurts at times.
Right. Stay classy.
And no, you aren't simply "disagreeing." I disagree with Bush and have called him a terrible President. But saying that Bush was a mass murderer just as evil as Adolf Hitler is definitely not just "disagreeing."
Am I wrong or are those here who are expressing their love for GW and his hokey-murdery ass the same fellows who lose their shit if someone else here expressed that they hope that folks like Chris Dorner got the best of the cops?
Am I wrong or are those here who are expressing their love for GW and his hokey-murdery ass the same fellows who lose their shit if someone else here expressed that they hope that folks like Chris Dorner got the best of the cops?
And no, you aren't simply "disagreeing." I disagree with Bush and have called him a terrible President. But saying that Bush was a mass murderer just as evil as Adolf Hitler is definitely not just "disagreeing."
It's your kind of rhetoric that causes Presidents to get assassinated.
If someone compared Obama to Hitler I would be just as critical of that comparison.