Ron Paul got 21% in Washington State in 2008, and he has increased his percentage in every single state so far. Therefore, it would be astoundingly disappointing if he got less than that in Washington. It would really mean that the GOP has decided to commit collective by becoming the Santorum party.
Puts hand over face. It doesn't work like that. You cannot compare 4 years ago to anything today and establish some type of on going pattern for today. Different variables are at play. Heck, Mitt has decreased his actual votes in many states but still leads the pack as 1 or 2 while leading the delegates.
how is santorum that favorable?
how is santorum that favorable?
That was taken 4 months before the vote. This is 2 weeks. 4 months is a lifetime in this primary.
Well if you want some really bad news check the latest Arizona polls - Ron at 6%. Barry G. is turning in his grave.
I remember seeing Ron Paul in New Hampshire last time around. There was a Congressman Goldwater traveling with Ron Paul. Oh AZI think Ron Paul would do better in AZ if he ran ads against birthright citizenship there but he is doing so poorly, there is no point.
However if the point of this thread is "Paul getting a win in WA is incredibly important" then I'd say ok, so what are we going to do about that? if the point is something else please detail it because nothing else constructive is coming to mind for me.
Arizona is basically the Florida of the southwest, only worse. This is the state that gave us John McCain and Mr. Janet Napolitano.
The polling for caucus states is on average highly inaccurate, as in 30%+ inaccurate.
http://electionate.com/2012/02/02/caucus-poll-bashing/
Now wildly inaccurate doesn't = "yay Paul is in the lead" but even so it does indeed equal wildly inaccurate.
Yea...running ads there is a waste of time, he has zero chance in AZ.
OH, GA, TX, and VA also look equally lousy.
A bunch of us warned everyone not to vote for PPP to poll WA.
This is why.
It may have cost Ron the nomination.