Paul dead last in Fox poll

Mitt Romneys sideburns said:
Im gona call up Hannity tomorrow and confess.

Its me. For several months now I have been spamming the internet to make it seem as if there are 10s of thousands of people out there who support Ron Paul.

Those videos you see of people waving ron paul signs. Well, thats just clever video editing.
Click to expand...

To get through the screeners you will have to call Sean and a great American and say some nonsense like we need to support the troops and win in Iraq.
 
EDUCATION PEOPLE

They post right above the poll exactly why it should not be trusted.

N=900 registered voters nationwide. Results below are among Republican voters (MoE ± 6)
Click to expand...

they only asked 900 people. and they only asked people who have voted before (no one 21 and under) and they only asked people who have voted before AS REPUBLICANS. and the margin of error is plus or minus 6%?

completely unscientific.
 
Murdoch wants a Giuliani/Clinton general election. There's no way a FOX poll can be trusted to indicate anything but what he wants it to indicate.

I travel in neocon circles and I haven't met a Giuliani supporter in weeks. That bombshell that he blew off the Iraq study group to go give paid speeches should be the kiss of death. (No wonder he'd "never heard that" huh?)

A nil result indicates a problem with the poll, maybe they didn't even record or even ask about Paul, or maybe the questions asked were slanted, or maybe they just called everybody who voted for paul a Libertarian so they didn't register.
 
Last edited:
I'll say it again. Ignore the MSM and their not so un-biased polls. Go to Meetup.com and look at the numbers. Polls and site traffic ratings can give a false reading, but Meetup numbers show who is actually willing to get off their butts to actually campaign and actually go to the polls that really matter (the primaries).
 
100% of former New Yorkers that I have polled disagree with Guiliani.

(This poll has an error factor of 0. Polling sample consisted of 2 with a definitive answer from 2).
 
ecliptic said:
Boycott all corporate media.

Ignore the propoganda and fight on. We have the power, all they can do is disinformation, distraction and lies. Their weapons are no longer effective. Their credibility is lost forever. The corporate media has sold us all down the river. They are no longer relevant. In the last year alone The Washington Post lost 3% of subscribers. Soon Apple iPhone's will put the web everywhere...
... and Apple TV gadgets allow you to disconnect your Television from corporate cable and obtain all your video from the World Wild Web. This is a content revolution which will make the Ron Paul re>love<ution so many times more powerful. Times are changin'

The People Awake!
Click to expand...

YOU ARE SO CORRECT!!!

THANK GOD FOR THE IPHONE!

Today once people start buying iphones up.....On a commercial they touted You Tube access is integrated.....

You tube is quickly becoming 1 big feel good Ron Paul TV highlight reel.....

I think you are so right....the iphone release will help Ron Paul more than any other candidate!
 
I think this poll and the history of it (what the numbers were on the same candidates over the last few months) show that other than a few political junkies like us NO ONE is paying much attention to the race. Other than the "frontrunners" the highest any candidate has received all year in this poll is, I think, 4% for Tommy Thompson, and now 3% for Huckabee. This poll is all about name recognition. Ron Paul has almost no name recognition. The same can be said for the other "lower tier" candidates, except maybe Tommy Thompson (a lot of GOPers admire him for welfare reform), and his low numbers therefore speak volumes about his chances.

Howard Dean was at a similar level in June 2003. He had the media pushing him, thought, whereas Ron doesn't have that yet (although Comedy Central has helped out!). Ignore these polls for a while and try to get Ron's name out there. The polls will follow.
 
How does one vote in this poll? I am a registered voter and would like to. Thank you, Fox News.
 
nayjevin said:
EDUCATION PEOPLE

They post right above the poll exactly why it should not be trusted.



they only asked 900 people. and they only asked people who have voted before (no one 21 and under) and they only asked people who have voted before AS REPUBLICANS. and the margin of error is plus or minus 6%?

completely unscientific.
Click to expand...


Completely MANIPULATED.

They designed it to have the precise results they wanted.

Do NOT be discouraged by such silliness.

In fact, be ENCOURAGED.

They're worried.
 
Whether it is, or isn't true, we have no choice, but to get out there and keep trying with all our might. We have to win this thing, come hell or high water, if we want to have liberty, much less a country. There is no "do over" in this game!
 
ChicagoLawyer said:
I think this poll and the history of it (what the numbers were on the same candidates over the last few months) show that other than a few political junkies like us NO ONE is paying much attention to the race. Other than the "frontrunners" the highest any candidate has received all year in this poll is, I think, 4% for Tommy Thompson, and now 3% for Huckabee. This poll is all about name recognition. Ron Paul has almost no name recognition. The same can be said for the other "lower tier" candidates, except maybe Tommy Thompson (a lot of GOPers admire him for welfare reform), and his low numbers therefore speak volumes about his chances.

Howard Dean was at a similar level in June 2003. He had the media pushing him, thought, whereas Ron doesn't have that yet (although Comedy Central has helped out!). Ignore these polls for a while and try to get Ron's name out there. The polls will follow.
Click to expand...

I think the real problem with the current polls is probably the "likely primary voter" model.

It allows for the unilateral determination on the part of those conducting the poll that a given respondent isn't a likely primary voter.

They rely on self-description for part of the model, but also on things like whether you say you voted in the last primary, and whether you say you recently changed your registration.

So if you didn't vote in the last primary cycle because you hate Bush and no one ran against him, you aren't a likely primary voter.
 
How many of you were Polled? Just wondering. I know I wasn't. I don't even know anybody who was. Do you? Just go around and ask everyone that you know and see and come in contact with. Have you ever been polled about the presidential candidates? I'll bet if you ask 1,000, you might find one or two. Try it. Tell everyone you ask to try it too. You'll see......
Its all bullshit.
 
I have to admit that the real people that I come into contact with do not know Ron Paul either.
 
wecandoit said:
Blatant propaganda. They have their hero Rudy G. with a 12 point lead after a whopping 7 point increase from the last polling! LOL! He has been sinking like a rock everywhere else.

This is like changing an F on your report card to an A, couldn't just settle for a B now could ya?, ya think we're stupid?
Click to expand...


abyi9.jpg
 
I can see that fox news is on the pay roll.
thats why they have rudy always on the top.

and why should we be worried about this neocon poll?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Anti Federalist
Ohio heat wave
Replies
1
Views
279
jkr
jkr
Occam's Banana
Mises University 2025
2 3
Replies
45
Views
875
Occam's Banana
Occam's Banana
jmdrake
New Poll Shows Harris Lead Cut From 10% to 5% In Tim Waltz State Of MN
Replies
2
Views
769
Anti Globalist
Anti Globalist
PAF
Josh Hawley Proves That Republicans Still Don’t Understand Economics
2 3 4
Replies
69
Views
940
ClaytonB
ClaytonB
Anti Federalist
2024 New Hampshire primary polling
4 5 6
Replies
114
Views
9K
spudea
S
Back
Top