Not true and I have condemned black individuals more than once on this forum.
Here is me in 2010 supporting "Epic Beard Man" the white guy who beat the crap out of a black "ignorant piece of shit".
OF COURSE you wouldn't be BLATANTLY biased-toward-Black on Ron Paul Forums.
Too, there is the abiding component of SOME OF MY BEST FRIENDS/DEEDS ARE [whoever/whatever I am effectively biased AGAINST, by being fundamentally biased in FAVOR of someone/something else].
NO ONE BUT NUT CASES AND ROBOTS/AUTOMATONS are 100% consistent, 100% of the time.
You CONSISTENTLY lean/slant/FEEL in favor of Black.
It's great that you already told people this but again it is not true.
What ELSE would you say, about my saying:
(I have already told you/Board that I BELIEVE you are an Obama Apologist.)
If you aren't in Obama's camp outright, operating SUBTLY (he IS known to have trumped Establishment in Social Media), you "naturally" quasi-apologize for him because that would be CONSISTENT with being biased in favor of Blacks.
I am a SPADE CALLER from way back, with SPADE having ZERO reference to Blacks. I have been calling a spade a Spade since Negroes were still sometimes "accidentally" called ******s.
[PeeCee asterisks NOT mine.]
Let us be windex-clear that I wouldn't say ANY of this, but for my belief that DOOM-ISH-NESS impends.
Now. You can say I am in Romney/Johnson/Whoever's camp, and I will say it is not true.
Then I could waste a buncha Time = Scarcest Resource looking for a several-year-old thread, or I could cut to the chase.
I have been "on" to YOU since you feigned WHADDYA MEAN, when I posed the question: WHY DID ROD BLAGOJEVICH'S APPROVAL RATING REMAIN OVER 40% WITH BLACK VOTERS, LONG AFTER IT WAS IN THE CRAPPER WITH OTHER VOTERS?
It was a thread about CHICAGO-STYLE POLITICS coming to Washington DC.