Official Thread: 2024 Vote Fraud

[TheTexan]

And just who do you think that is? Ya think it just might be someone at the county board of elections? And if you that person would deliberately back date the stamp to hide the fact that the ballot was received after the election day deadline, wouldn't he or she do so whether or not the envelope had a handwritten date on it?

Well, if it's got a handwritten date on it that says (after election day), and the stamp they use says (prior to election day), you've arrived at one of the reasons of having handwritten dates in the first place. Great job!

In either case, handwritten anything is a shitload harder to fake in large amounts. It could be a handwritten statement of that person's home address, or the name of their favorite dog. Handwritten stuff has value in audits and that's probably the real reason they had it removed.

 

[PAF]

Well, if it's got a handwritten date on it that says (after election day), and the stamp they use says (prior to election day), you've arrived at one of the reasons of having handwritten dates in the first place. Great job!

In either case, handwritten anything is a $#@!load harder to fake in large amounts. It could be a handwritten statement of that person's home address, or the name of their favorite dog. Handwritten stuff has value in audits and that's probably the real reason they had it removed.

It still wouldn't matter, they would still find a way:

Does Your Vote Count? "Why Even Ask The Question?"

 

[jmdrake]

Punctuality is White Supremacy.

Google "Urban dictionary CPT"

 

[TheTexan]

It still wouldn't matter, they would still find a way:

Does Your Vote Count? "Why Even Ask The Question?"

Yea but its fun to fantasize sometimes that any of this matters

 

[Sonny Tufts]

Well, if it's got a handwritten date on it that says (after election day), and the stamp they use says (prior to election day), you've arrived at one of the reasons of having handwritten dates in the first place. Great job!

Except the case involved timely-received ballots with no date. So there is no issue regarding timeliness. The question neither you nor anyone else seems to know the answer to is if a ballot is timely received what is the purpose of the handwritten date? What compelling governmental function does it serve?

Even, as in your hypothetical, an incorrect date (i.e., one after the election date) appears on a timely-received ballot, what's the problem? What's the significance of the date? The only possible one that I can see is that it's theoretically possible some election worker could falsify the date the ballot was received; to do this he would have to falsify the timestamp on the ballot and its barcode scan. But I think it's a fair assumption that the timestamp and barcode scan occur before the envelope is even opened. If so, why would an election worker try to throw out a ballot when he doesn't even know who the vote is for? This scenario is too improbable to imagine.

 

[TheTexan]

Except the case involved timely-received ballots with no date. So there is no issue regarding timeliness. The question neither you nor anyone else seems to know the answer to is if a ballot is timely received what is the purpose of the handwritten date? What compelling governmental function does it serve?

I already answered it, and you just ignored it entirely. I'll end this here.

 

[Occam's Banana]

Google "Urban dictionary CPT"

LOL

You must spread some Reputation around before giving it to jmdrake again.

 

[unknown]

https://www.ssa.gov/open/havv/havv-totals-2024.html

.

 

[jmdrake]

Governor Greg Abbott today announced that since signing Senate Bill 1 into law in 2021, Texas has removed over one million people from the state’s voter rolls, including people who moved out-of-state, are deceased, and are noncitizens. That removal process has been, and will continue to be, ongoing.

More at: https://gov.texas.gov/news/post/gov...on-ineligible-voters-removed-from-voter-rolls

I'm sure you'll let us know if any of these actually turn out ot be illegal immigrants. In the meantime there have already been multiple stories of false positives.

 

[Voluntarist]

Almost 3 Million Noncitizens Could Vote Illegally in U.S. Election, Study Says

I'm less concerned with what some study says than I am with the fact that at least 79 million STUPID citizens are expected be turning out to vote in 2024

That's based on the turnout in 2020 being about 158 million (and George Carlin's statement, "Look how stupid the average voter is, and realize that half of all voters are worse than that")

Larry David Superbowl Commercial for FTX ("Even the stupid ones?"):
https://youtu.be/hWMnbJJpeZc?t=64

 

[Philhelm]

Wow. If they concentrated them all in one district they could totally steal a mayor's office. If the town wasn't too big.

6.4 percent of almost one percent of the population. No wonder Republicans are more ate up with this than dead people voting , mail in ballots and Dominion machines combined.

Either that or the ARMSM is doing a heckofa job using it to distract MAGA from the real problems.

I don't think it's the votes they need so much as the registrations so that they can fabricate ballots.

 

[acptulsa]

I don't think it's the votes they need so much as the registrations so that they can fabricate ballots.

I think what they want is citizens mad enough to shoot people, and/or scared enough to beg for nationwide stop-and-frisk.

 

[TheCount]

I think what they want is citizens mad enough to shoot people, and/or scared enough to beg for nationwide stop-and-frisk.

Worse, the plan is to make a second cabinet level department of homeland security just for border patrol and immigration

Because the first DHS has been so great let's do it again

 

[Brian4Liberty]

https://x.com/hernandoarce/status/1830951572026606002


"Voter outreach".

 

[Swordsmyth]

I'm sure you'll let us know if any of these actually turn out ot be illegal immigrants. In the meantime there have already been multiple stories of false positives.

There have been plenty of examples of real cases.

It's strange how some people here are so eager to support the leftist/MSM party line that it's not a problem.

 

[Swordsmyth]

I think what they want is citizens mad enough to shoot people, and/or scared enough to beg for nationwide stop-and-frisk.

What they want is the power to install a senile fool or dope addled airhead and tell the people they voted for it.
If they can make that work consistently they can do anything they want and tell everyone it's their neighbors' fault, they've already been doing it with the senile fool, they don't need anything more than to make sure they can continue to do it until they have entrenched their power enough to pull a Maduro or a Lula/Moraes and just dare anyone to do anything about it.
Trying to stop people from opposing their methods while we still have a chance and fantasizing that Trump is their plan to suppress votes for him speaks volumes about you.

 

[jmdrake]

There have been plenty of examples of real cases.

It's strange how some people here are so eager to support the leftist/MSM party line that it's not a problem.

I posted a thread about this. Maybe you missed it. Out of supposedly millions of illegal votes, so far I've only found 19 indictments for alien voting when Trump was in chrage of the DOJ. Certainly you could come up with at least a few thousand....right?

 

[unknown]

https://www.ssa.gov/open/havv/havv-totals-2024.html

.

 

[acptulsa]

Trying to stop people from opposing their methods while we still have a chance and fantasizing that Trump is their plan to suppress votes for him speaks volumes about you.

Trying to discredit people who point out facts with innuendo, while fantasizing that the party which robbed Ron Paul supporters of even the chance to stand up and be counted in Tampa in '12 loves us and wants us to be happy, says even more about you.

 

[Swordsmyth]

I posted a thread about this. Maybe you missed it. Out of supposedly millions of illegal votes, so far I've only found 19 indictments for alien voting when Trump was in chrage of the DOJ. Certainly you could come up with at least a few thousand....right?

Feigning ignorance won't help you when there are already examples in this very thread:

WOW! OVER 10,000 ILLEGAL ALIENS USED THE SAME SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER TO VOTE IN 2020 IN ARIZONA!

Congress knew this & certified the results anyway.

Share to make this GO VIRAL & MAKE SURE TO Sign the petition in the link in my bio to DEMAND OUR ELECTIONS BE SECURED! pic.twitter.com/iUNcNhM5zE

— Carter Hughes (@itscarterhughes) August 17, 2024
​

https://twitter.com/itscarterhughes/...82640639427003


In 2014, the academic journal Electoral Studiespublished a groundbreaking study by three scholars who estimated how frequently non-citizens were illegally voting. Based on data for the 2008 presidential and congressional elections, the study found that:

• “roughly one quarter of non-citizens” in the U.S. “were likely registered to vote.”
• “6.4% of non-citizens actually voted.”
• 81.8% of them “reported voting for Barack Obama.”
• illegal votes cast by non-citizens “likely” changed “important election outcomes” in favor of Democrats, “including Electoral College votes” and a “pivotal” U.S. Senate race that enabled Democrats to pass Obamacare.

The study’s voter registration rate was estimated with data from two key sources:

1. A national survey in which 14.8% of non-citizens admitted that they were registered to vote.
2. A database of registered voters that reveals what portion of the surveyed non-citizens “were in fact registered” even though “they claimed not to be registered.”

By combining these data, the author’s “best” estimate was that 25.1% of non-citizens were illegally registered to vote.
The authors calculated voter turnout with the same datasets, but their methodology yielded a best estimate that 6.4% of non-citizens voted in 2008—lower than the 8.0% of non-citizens who stated “I definitely voted” and explicitly named the candidate they voted for. This and other matters led Just Facts to engage in extensive correspondence with the lead author of the study to verify practically every detail of it.
Just Facts then conducted a comparable study that used the same datasets, a more straightforward methodology, and related studies to constrain assumptions. This found that roughly 27% of non-citizens were registered to vote and about 16% of them voted in the 2008 national elections.

More at: https://www.justfacts.com/news_non-c...r_registration


And the establishment and their useful idiots wouldn't be so desperate to squash any discussion of this if it weren't true.