‘Non- Binary’ Transgender Deacon ?

[Dr.3D]

Makes me wonder if Michael Moore is a trans fat.

 

[tod evans]

transgender used to be known as a dissociative disorder.

"Trans" still means a Muncie rockcrusher or TH400 to me....

These people with their weird ideas are pretty out there..

 

[torchbearer]

Well a Tranny is something on my truck. But elsewhere is means something weird.

 

[Sola_Fide]

Condemnation equates to love......In your mind.

No. It doesn't equate to love, but it is a loving thing to do. That is why Jesus did it...because of love.

 

[Sola_Fide]

The Methodist Church is the only true and righteous church. All the others can get the hell out.

Based on what?

 

[torchbearer]

Based on what?

The love of Jesus. Everyone knows Jesus favors one denomination of a forked off Judaism Distro.

 

[fedupinmo]

Yeah, that's what I'm saying. Supporting traditional gender roles or supporting non traditional gender roles really means nothing in the grand scheme of things. The rejection of the gospel is what matters.

Genesis 1:27 mentions no non-binary individuals...

 

[Sola_Fide]

The love of Jesus. Everyone knows Jesus favors one denomination of a forked off Judaism Distro.

Huh?

 

[torchbearer]

Huh?

In Linux there are trees of Linux variations called Distros.
Christians forked off of the chosen people, they have a distro that traces back to God's chosen people.
So, it must be that God has demoted his chosen for a new Distro.
Not biblical at all, but american christians think God loves their lil' special bastardization better than others.

 

[Sola_Fide]

Genesis 1:27 mentions no non-binary individuals...

Right. The Bible doesn't support murdering innocent people either. And if some liberal church who rejected the gospel condemned murdering innocent people, then they would be right to do that. The point is: Arminianism is a rejection of the gospel, so that is the most important thing to focus on. These people are lost and they need the gospel.

 

[Sola_Fide]

In Linux there are trees of Linux variations called Distros.
Christians forked off of the chosen people, they have a distro that traces back to God's chosen people.
So, it must be that God has demoted his chosen for a new Distro.
Not biblical at all, but american christians think God loves their lil' special bastardization better than others.

First, the bible says that those who trust in Christ alone are the children of Abraham by faith. They are the chosen ones. There hasn't been 2 different sets of chosen people, first Jews then Christians. There have always been a remnant chosen by faith. The chosen ones have always had trust in God alone for their salvation.

 

[Anti Federalist]

Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light, and light for darkness; that put bitter for sweet, and sweet for bitter! - Isaiah 5:20

 

[torchbearer]

First, the bible says that those who trust in Christ alone are the children of Abraham by faith. They are the chosen ones. There hasn't been 2 different sets of chosen people, first Jews then Christians. There have always been a remnant chosen by faith. The chosen ones have always had trust in God alone for their salvation.

There are two set of people, one who sees Jesus as the messiah mentioned by Daniel... and others who know he didn't meet the prophecy and are waiting for that messiah to come.

 

[Sola_Fide]

There are two set of people, one who sees Jesus as the messiah mentioned by Daniel... and others who know he didn't meet the prophecy and are waiting for that messiah to come.

What set is the second group? If anyone thinks that Jesus is not the Messiah then that person is lost, and doesn't worship Jesus.

 

[tod evans]

No. It doesn't equate to love, but it is a loving thing to do. That is why Jesus did it...because of love.

Jesus didn't condemn Methodists, you did.

 

[Sola_Fide]

Jesus didn't condemn Methodists, you did.

The Bible does codemn Methodist theology, because it's not Biblical.

And in a way, Jesus did condemn all forms of synergism, of which Methodism would be included.

 

[georgiaboy]

The point is: Arminianism is a rejection of the gospel.

In love, this is an untrue statement.

I was blind, but now I see.

I once leaned Calvinist, I now lean Arminian.

I can still see.

 

[Yieu]

No. It doesn't equate to love, but it is a loving thing to do. That is why Jesus did it...because of love.

So you think yourself so great that you believe you are equal to Jesus and can imitate Him by condemning or judging others' salvation with divine knowledge of their fate, rather than seeing oneself as a subordinate servant to the Lord. I think that such a brash and vengeful attitude does not help anyone, that it is better to serve the Lord than to imitate, and that by imitating we would be declaring ourselves as equal to the Lord. Even in your personal beliefs, by His divine will, the Lord will force us to be saved or not, so I do not see a use in pretending to be the final arbiter by condemning others. In fact, such condemning could be considered bad or the opposite of loving, because it could convince someone that faith in the Lord (or at least Calvinism) is a bad thing due to seeing the confrontational attitude as a sign of the speaker being wrong.

 

[Sola_Fide]

In love, this is an untrue statement.

I was blind, but now I see.

I once leaned Calvinist, I now lean Arminian.

I can still see.

See what? That God alone is not responsible for salvation? That's not the gospel. That's a false gospel.

1 Corinthians 1:30

It is because of him that you are in Christ Jesus, who has become for us wisdom from God—that is, our righteousness, holiness and redemption.

 

[tod evans]

The Bible does codemn Methodist theology, because it's not Biblical.

And in a way, Jesus did condemn all forms of synergism, of which Methodism would be included.

Once again; You condemned the Methodist church.