awake
Member
- Joined
- May 13, 2008
- Messages
- 4,358
Rivers, lakes, and oceans would be most of the water on the planet. And as you point out, there would be a very high burden of proof required by an individual against a bigger and wealthier company to prove first that you were harmed and secondly that this particular company was the source of the pollution which harmed you. If many companies are dumping waste into water or air, how do you decide which is to blame for what problem? The chances of an individual prevailing would be difficult at best.
The other problem with "ownership" of water or air is that it cannot be contained- it moves around. I can build a fence around my land to keep people from either coming onto it or if they cause damages it is easy to determine if it occured on my land but the same cannot be said of air or water. I can't control or even define or protect what is "my" water or air- it is a shared resource. Things mix and mingle. You cannot contain polluted air on your own property but you can attempt to stop creating the pollution in the first place- and in a free market, that adds costs your competitors don't have to face if they don't want to so your being "clean" could price you out against your competitors. Thus you have no economic incentive to stop polluting. The market is saying you should continue to dump waste into air and water.
2 criticisms:
1. You are assuming that the mickey mouse justice system we have, which is over bloated and priced out of the common man's ability to withstand a multi-billion dollar corporation, is still in place to decide these matters. Monopoly justice provision needs to be addressed before you can repair, restore and build up proper property rights.
1b. If I own a river that is being illegally dumped in I have the incentive to stop the destruction of my property value. Currently the government is asleep at the wheel with collective ownership of public lands and waterways. Soviet Russia was famous under socialism for its levels of environmental destruction.
2.Water co-ops and free associations of large bodies of water would be formed as joint guardianship...You might never be able to stop trespassing and dumping but you have a much better chance of policing it if the resource is owned. Otherwise, you have the government pretending they have eyes on every square inch of public lands and water - which is an absurd and impossible notion.
2b Private water means private water products and services...Drinking water would be the concern of entrepreneurs, Swimming recreation, aquaculture...etc. Pollution would not be in the owners best interest.
Define polluted air? Science can forensically detect it..environmental forensics would flourish under a free market justice system.
Last edited: