Read the first page of the thread, most of it is this sub forums usual fluff and not anything by which a drive by reader could see a rebuttal. It is distracting to wade through and by page 2, who bothers? HU provided a video, but most will skip over that in preference for a point 1 is wrong because response. Who really wants to read long OP then sit through a video that may or may not deal with the points in OP? So far seems like it is people talking past each other, and I only waded into the discussion hoping to point out why some of us might post threads we don't engage in because we care about providing another way to see the glass even if we may not agree with everything in the article we post. I know some have made great leaps as to what I believe after they assume I support something I bring up for such a reason as to expand exposure to other viewpoints.
I got the impression most folks were not on board with the original premise but not a serious why as my eyes glazed over after page 1. I sure don't blame those who might agree with the original premise from not participating because it usually isn't worth the trouble when certain people can derail the conversation and waste people's time as often as they do. (And I say this as a general response of those who fail to affirm unconventional stances and not so's the usual witch hunters can assume I have an opinion on the OP)
Paul couldn't manage to come up with anything more original to use?
I am guessing this is sort of the HT of religious threads so they don't get space in other sub forums but allow folks to release pressure somewhere.
