That's only because
@Anti Federalist brings up race and crime on a daily basis.

Content without context is pretext. You're doing some hella pretext here.
No, I get it, but you used my post to make your case. And if you're going to do that, and inject race into, you can expect to be called out. You never know which neighbor may commit a crime, but if you want to use race as an indicator, now you're playing the odds. But the point of MY rebuttal is that using race is dumb.
^That is simply NOT true and you know it or SHOULD know it! There was NO increase PER CAPITA in crime in Springfield. Per capita crime went DOWN!
Read what I said again. There was more crime afterwards. Regardless of the race. "Per capita" doesn't matter to the victims when there are more crimes committed.
You don't think that many people wouldn't cause at least a slight increase in overall crime?
YES! That's why the race doesn't matter! Are you getting this yet?? lol. But natural vs. artificial immigration DOES matter.

And Trump trying to coax white South Africans to come to the U.S. under fake claims of genocide is not "natural migration." Supposedly 67,000 signed up but only 60 came. And NGOs were involved in their resettlement. And if you have principles you will speak out against what Trump is doing on this because he's attempting to use the SAME NGOs to resettle white South African farmers who are NOT under extreme threat of violence.
Yep. And if you look around, you'll probably find me saying so.
At least one NGO dropped out of the program because of the obvious hypocrisy.
I'd hope. But I do have my suspicions that
this program didn't align with the goals of that NGO.
And ONCE AGAIN you're going to ignore what I posted about Tangelo Park Florida because it doesn't fit your narrative. The crime decreased by 50% not because of some change in culture but because of an increase in access to economic resources. I rest my case.
Did you visit my linked post? Tangelo Park isn't an anomaly. Well, maybe in that they had a benefactor. But more importantly than the money was that they had someone influential who 1) recognized that the current culture was flawed 2) cared enough to try to change it and 3) put his resources behind changing the culture.
But it doesn't take millions (although, that doesn't hurt). In addition to the scholarships, the cornerstone of the program was the Family Resource Center where parents attended courses on positive parenting, received counseling, and got food and other support. They also instituted
an effective community advisory board to train local leaders on how to change a culture.
This is different from the "community organizing" that happens in other neighborhoods where the primary focus is how to secure more money from other people and blame-shifting. Rosen took that incentive away.