Remember Malcolm X's words: "by any means necessary".
I'm ready to organize teams by party and send resolutions to party leaders
demanding to separate policies and funding for health care, citing these religiously held differences:
A. prochoice vs. prolife views on funding abortions and birth control
B. legalization issues and who is going to pay for health issues correlated with marijuana addictions or smoking
C. immigration issues, and whether people believe in earned amnesty and paying back for health care, education and other costs
while residents are in process of naturalization
D. differences in beliefs regarding the death penalty or life imprisonment, health care for criminally ill,
and research into spiritual healing for longterm treatment and cure of mental and criminal illness (instead of funding medications only)
The bill or amendment I'd like to write up would
demand that party leaders and members RECOGNIZE the right
to exercise and fund our own beliefs about health care, private or public,
mandatory or charitable and voluntary, without harassment, abuse, censorship or penalty imposed by members of other parties with conflicting beliefs.
This is pursuant to Amendment One Religious Freedom, Amendment Fourteen Equal Protection of the Laws from Discrimination by Creed,
and Fourth-Seventh Amendment Rights to security from unwarranted searches and seizures and not being deprived of liberty without due process of law.
Having different political views is NOT a crime to be punished or penalized by the state for seeking to practice these freely and financially responsibly.
So this bill proposed would authorize "Singlepayer advocates" to set up their own IRS payment and health care network systems through
the Democrat and Green Party to pay for health care automatically according to their beliefs in mandatory or voluntary participation and funding; while those who believe in funding health care with respect to free market and state rights can fund their own alternatives through the Libertarian and Republican Party by membership.
Instead of taxation without representation, the taxes and funding on health care could be divided either proportionally
or by registered membership through the policies that people choose to fund and follow, even electing their own reps and voting
on their own programs through their own Party.
If taxes are mandatory, these should be separated where people are not forced to fund policies or programs against
our political or religious beliefs; these should be separated, and possibly voluntary, similar to religious activities.
In no way should either Party be allowed to abuse political, legal, legislative or media influence collectively
to deny, abridge, infringe upon or discriminate against any individual person for having different political or religious beliefs
about health care which is a private choice.
Only when one commits a crime or imposes costs beyond ability to pay does this impose on others.
There was no "due process" to prove that lawabiding taxpayers "committed any crime or violation" to lose our rights
to choose health care and how to pay for it, before these mandates were imposed to take away those freedoms.
To remedy this, the ACA should be interpreted as optional, where funding and following it is voluntary by Party.
Otherwise, if the ACA is imposed as mandatory by federal law and taxation, it is establishing the equivalent of a establishing a national political religion, which not all citizens believe in and cannot be forced to fund or follow against our will.
Anyone who wants to help write this up, I believe that members of each Party should address their own leaders,
write up their own resolutions, and have the other Party members co-sign under them.
And separate the health care policies and funding by Party to recognize free and equal choice under the Constitution.
Thank you.