Libertarian Party 2024 POTUS/VP ticket: Chase Oliver & Mike ter Maat

The
@LPMisesCaucus
set out on a mission to bring the Ron Paul revolution into the Libertarian Party. To shed the party of goofiness, wokeness and corruption. It’s been an incredibly rewarding journey and I’ve met some amazing people, who will be lifelong friends, along the way. At the last convention in Reno, we swept every position with super majorities.

This weekend we retained control of the LNC while reelecting Angela Mcardle who is a phenomenal chair and put on the best convention in the party’s history. Unfortunately, we lost the big one and there’s no getting around that.

I can’t ignore the elephant in the room here: this is all my fault. When I was planning on running there was tremendous enthusiasm and energy amongst our ranks. When I pulled out for family related reasons, it pulled the rug out from under our guys and we weren’t able to recover.

It’s ridiculous to put any blame on [MENTION=9988]Mises[/MENTION]Chair
for this. He is an incredibly decent, brilliant and hard working person who never compromised his principles and continued to fight for the MC vision.
@RecTheRegime
was the best candidate willing to step up and worked tirelessly, while making enormous personal sacrifices for the cause. He came within a hair of winning but fell short.

The blame is on me, not those guys. I deserve to take my lumps and I can handle that but please don’t take this out on good people who busted their asses for you. It’s my fault and I’m sorry I let you down.

Yesterday I congratulated Chase in person and on here. Of course I can’t endorse or vote for him, just as he wouldn’t for me. He doesn’t represent me and my camp or the things we stand for.

I will always support Angela and the MC team. Hopefully we accomplish more amazing things in the future. I’m going to continue doing what I do: spreading our ideas to as large an audience as possible, in the most compelling way I can. See you soon, Cuomo.

Dave Smith

https://twitter.com/ComicDaveSmith/status/1795079327731855476
 
The leftarians are in charge, no coubt.

AF, help me out here... While I agree to some extent, how can one make that statement while ignoring/dismissing the rightarians? I remember identifying a root cause of an issue and the enormous finances involved, but then I was told that it didn't matter?

I am to understand that rightarians are the best philosophy, as long as it is contrary to the leftarian philosophy?
 
AF, help me out here... While I agree to some extent, how can one make that statement while ignoring/dismissing the rightarians? I remember identifying a root cause of an issue and the enormous finances involved, but then I was told that it didn't matter?

I am to understand that rightarians are the best philosophy, as long as it is contrary to the leftarian philosophy?

I am not in favor of grown men in dresses waving their dicks at 8 year old kids in the library.

This man is.

I don't know what sort of political philosophy you want to ascribe to that position.
 
AF, help me out here... While I agree to some extent, how can one make that statement while ignoring/dismissing the rightarians? I remember identifying a root cause of an issue and the enormous finances involved, but then I was told that it didn't matter?

I am to understand that rightarians are the best philosophy, as long as it is contrary to the leftarian philosophy?

I am not in favor of abortion on demand, at any time during pregnancy. Neither is Ron Paul. Neither is Javier Milie.

This man is.
 
I am not in favor of grown men in dresses waving their dicks at 8 year old kids in the library.

This man is.

I don't know what sort of political philosophy you want to ascribe to that position.


Oh come on now, don't chicken out lol. Of course I agree with what you wrote above. But it seems that you have completely evaded the question that I asked:


AF, help me out here... While I agree to some extent, how can one make that statement while ignoring/dismissing the rightarians? I remember identifying a root cause of an issue and the enormous finances involved, but then I was told that it didn't matter?

I am to understand that rightarians are the best philosophy, as long as it is contrary to the leftarian philosophy?
 
AF, help me out here... While I agree to some extent, how can one make that statement while ignoring/dismissing the rightarians? I remember identifying a root cause of an issue and the enormous finances involved, but then I was told that it didn't matter?

I am to understand that rightarians are the best philosophy, as long as it is contrary to the leftarian philosophy?

"Leftarian" is a term made up to describe the strange sect of LP interlopers the Mises Caucus is trying to defang.
 
I am not in favor of abortion on demand, at any time during pregnancy. Neither is Ron Paul. Neither is Javier Milie.

This man is.

Yeah, I saw that [MENTION=1874]Brian4Liberty[/MENTION] tried to ruffle my feathers [once again] to give the impression that I somehow disagree with that. When in fact my position is that I believe that life should be defended/protected at the point of conception.
 
"Leftarian" is a term made up to describe the strange sect of LP interlopers the Mises Caucus is trying to defang.

Yes, I understand that. I am asking [MENTION=3169]Anti Federalist[/MENTION] to clarify his rightarain position, which involves funding, and he said "it doesn't matter".
 
Last edited:
Yeah, I saw that [MENTION=1874]Brian4Liberty[/MENTION] tried to ruffle my feathers [once again] to give the impression that I somehow disagree with that. When in fact my position is that I believe that life should be defended/protected at the point of conception.

Lol. Wut? Paranoid much?
 
I don't know what the Mises Caucus was thinking with Rectenwald. He had the enthusiasm of a cabbage. I like that Dave is owning it, but they should have been able to find someone. He also didn't help himself when he couldn't explain his views on "private security" replacing courts. In my mind and I would think most people's, one of the few legitimate purposes of government is to adjudicate disputes that result on someone infringing on the rights of someone else.
 
Yes, I understand that. I am asking [MENTION=3169]Anti Federalist[/MENTION] to clarify his rightarain position, which involves funding, and he said "it doesn't matter".

I'm losing you...clarify what, specifically?
 
Back
Top