Libertarian Gary Johnson in double digits in race against Hillary Clinton, Donald Trump: poll

[William Tell]

50 million dead babies agree.

Liberty and the pursuit of happiness are enough when you are dead in a dumpster. Who needs life, right?

 

[acptulsa]

Liberty and the pursuit of happiness are enough when you are dead in a dumpster. Who needs life, right?

You know, the last four GOP presidents we had were ostensibly against abortion, but did less than nothing about it. At least Gary Johnson stands a good chance of trying to cut federal funding for it. That's more than Trump, or Cruz, or any other current GOP presidential candidate will ever do.

To end forcing people with moral objections to abortion to fund it out of their pockets would be a major victory. A major victory. A greater victory than any Republican has scored on that issue in more than fifty years.

 

[jmdrake]

The CP ran Virgil Goode in 2012; Goode voted to authorize the Iraq War and supported the so called "PATRIOT" Act. Goode has already endorsed Drumpf. Let's hope the CP comes to their senses this time around.

Damn. Didn't know that. Where's Chuck Baldwin when you need him? I vote for Goode thinking he was the second coming of Baldwin. Mea Culpa. That said, if he's endorsed Trump then it's a certainty he won't seek the CP nomination.

 

[RJ Liberty]

Damn. Didn't know that. Where's Chuck Baldwin when you need him? I vote for Goode thinking he was the second coming of Baldwin. Mea Culpa. That said, if he's endorsed Trump then it's a certainty he won't seek the CP nomination.

Chuck Baldwin apparently recently left the Constitution Party for a party I'd never heard of: the Independent American Party. Not sure he'll be back in the CP, and some third party info sites list him as an "improbable" 2016 CP candidate.

I'd never vote for Virgil Goode, based on his support of wars and government surveillance. Might as well vote for a Neocon. And a vote for the CP is a vote taken away from the LP, so I'd need a really good CP candidate to even consider the CP. With Gary Johnson polling so well (as in, actual double digits), I'd hate to dilute the third party vote. Better one stronger third party than several weak ones, IMO. Though I do enjoy the C-SPAN debates they hold.

 

[Snowball]

Going hand in hand with open borders is eliminating the welfare state. Understand the big picture before calling someone a clown and moronic. Of course open borders and amnesty for all would lead to massive financial ruin if we continued with the welfare of today. Duh....

I do understand very well what I said, and Gary Johnson's positions are moronic.
You cannot have open borders, amnesty for illegals and smaller government.
Adults with life experience know this to be true.

 

[acptulsa]

I do understand very well what I said, and Gary Johnson's positions are moronic.
You cannot have open borders, amnesty for illegals and smaller government.
Adults with life experience know this to be true.

We can not or we may not?

Because we can, and we did--less than a hundred years ago. And it worked, too. As in, it worked so well they called it the Roaring Twenties.

Adults with both life experience and a grasp of history know this to be true. And won't believe lies about it.

We can. As for whether we may, that all depends on whether this is still a republic or not.

 

[undergroundrr]

We can not or we may not?

Because we can, and we did--less than a hundred years ago. And it worked, too. As in, it worked so well they called it the Roaring Twenties.

Adults with both life experience and a grasp of history know this to be true. And won't believe lies about it.

We can. As for whether we may, that all depends on whether this is still a republic or not.

+rep