Libertarian Gary Johnson in double digits in race against Hillary Clinton, Donald Trump: poll

Joined
Jul 8, 2007
Messages
1,689
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/mar/24/libertarian-gary-johnson-double-digits-race-agains/

"Libertarian Gary Johnson in double digits in race against Hillary Clinton, Donald Trump: poll


"Libertarian presidential hopeful Gary Johnson, possibly benefitting from dissatisfaction with the two major parties’ front-runners, is in double digits in a potential three-way race, according to a poll released Thursday.

"In a three-way contest, Democratic front-runner Hillary Clinton was at 42 percent, GOP front-runner Donald Trump was at 34 percent, and Mr. Johnson, who is seeking the Libertarian Party’s nomination, was at 11 percent, according to the Monmouth University poll."

{CONTINUED}

http://www.monmouth.edu/assets/0/32...1087/7714a05b-515f-4ad3-bdaa-e72a6e5f8e61.pdf
 
Fantastic!

I was trying to find a point of reference from 2012 (to see how the final result compared to the polls), to no avail.

Anyone know of any national polls Johnson v Romney v Obama from 2012?
 
I doubt there's much hope that TPTB will allow a 3 person debate with a LP candidate, but I guess a ruckus could be raised if he were to continue polling highly
 
It's a shame the open borders lunatics have taken over the Libertarian Party. Even if he won he'd make sure that he'd be the last non-Democrat in the White House.
 
funny

9% have favorable opinion of Gary... 76% have never heard of him... but 11% will vote for him.
 
funny

9% have favorable opinion of Gary... 76% have never heard of him... but 11% will vote for him.
It probably has a lot more to do with distaste for the two front-runners rather than people actually wanting GJ to be president
 
But Johnson ended up with less than 1 percent.

Right

He underperformed the polls then, and he'll probably underperform them again.

All I'm saying is that, since he's polling higher this time (about twice as high), he should do better.

He polled 6% and ended up with 1% last time; now he's polling 11%, so maybe be ends up with 2%.
 
This is great news. Thinking about the Gary Johnson thing, he might be the liberal appealing Libertarian we need. I was never to hot on his monatary policy knowledge or his abortion stance, but let's be pragmatic... When Hillary gets the democratic nomination there will be a lot of unhappy liberals, the kinds we had supporting Ron before. When trump wins the nomination there will be a lot of unhappy conservitives, the kind we had supporting Ron before. Gary Johnson might be able to pull together a coalition from these folks. Worst case scenario Hillary wins like she was going to against trump. Best case Gary Johnson pulls out an upset win if trump and Hillary completely self destructs. Almost best case and a huge improvement over the way things have been going, Gary gets more then 5% maybe even 15-20% and legitimizes libertarians and third party's. I'm willing to cede my purity on monatary policy understanding and abortion for a coalition that really busts up the two party system, unlike trump who is just more of the same.
 
Right

He underperformed the polls then, and he'll probably underperform them again.

All I'm saying is that, since he's polling higher this time (about twice as high), he should do better.

He polled 6% and ended up with 1% last time; now he's polling 11%, so maybe be ends up with 2%.

I would expect him to perform closer to his poll numbers the higher he polls. Once you start polling in double digits that's when people are more likely to feel like they aren't throwing their vote away by voting for you. It's one thing to tell someone on the phone that you will vote one way, but when that candidate is only polling 6% there is very little reason to actually pick him in the ballot box.
 
All aboard the Gary Johnson train, Mcafee for VP! How's that for presidential security?
 
I would expect him to perform closer to his poll numbers the higher he polls. Once you start polling in double digits that's when people are more likely to feel like they aren't throwing their vote away by voting for you. It's one thing to tell someone on the phone that you will vote one way, but when that candidate is only polling 6% there is very little reason to actually pick him in the ballot box.

Good point
 
Back
Top