- Joined
- Nov 5, 2010
- Messages
- 40,064
Ok, the orange one can do no wrong and runs big beautiful perfect businesses, you all win. I explained, you all don't accept the reality of the situation, I'm done.
No one said any such thing. You are projecting your own absurd binary onto others.
So all of you defending Trump already made your donations right?
You really aren't capable of understanding anything except in terms of it being "for" or "against" Trump, are you?

"Defending Trump" (on one hand) and opposing the state for engaging in blatantly - and in this case, even explicitly - politically-motivated litigation in which no victims can be identified and no damages can be specified (on the other hand) are entirely different things.
No, they were out to get Trump. This is a selective prosecution, many others do the same and got away with it. That doesn't mean Trump isn't guilty of it.
Those "many others [who] do the same and got away with it" did not do anything wrong, either. Neither Trump nor they should be considered to be "guilty" of anything (and not just because the legal concept of "guilt" does not apply in civil cases).
And you can just stow your hand-waving shuck-and-jive bullshit about hypothetical wannabe borrowers who supposedly didn't get loans "because Trump". For one thing, would-be borrowers are not entitled to loans just because they want them. For another thing, one could just as easily argue that more borrowers, not fewer, ended up getting loans "because Trump", since Trump paid back the loans in full and with interest (thereby supplying the bank with more loanable assets). It's all just a flimsy excuse for pretending that Trump is somehoe "guilty" of something in this case.
Last edited: