Judge Napolitano meets with Trump for a full hour

Which proves that you don't love most things about Ron Paul.

oZ8aJ.gif
 
Last edited:
Yeah, since billionaires, Goldman bankers and oil CEOs have been so underrepresented in positions of power that it's time for the little guy to take a break from running things under a Trump administration and let the billionaires, bankers and oil CEOs steer the ship for a while. :rolleyes:

I assure you the NWO is not shaking in their boots at the thought of Gary fuckin' Cohn as Trump's top econ guy. Did you know that all male CEOs of major corporations are freemasons? Female CEOs are wives of masons, too.

Wake me when Trump actually picks someone for any position that's not been part of the swamp for the last bazillion years. Meet with Rand, Judge Nap, etc? Great. But it's still just meetings and would be to appease folks like you into thinking Trump is anything other than what he's so far shown himself to be through his hirings.

So what? I'm a freemason and you don't see me preaching NWO bS... methinks you've watched too many interwebz videos...
 
Let's not forget that Trump also met with 'his good friend' Henry Fucking Kissinger, Al Gore, and many other unsavory creatures. Good that the Judge had his ear, not holding my breath for a sudden surge in Constitutionalism in government.
 
Sadly, this is true. I don't think even Rand could get away with nominating him. But the funny thing is that if there was one person who could do it, it is Trump. But hopefully he can pass him the names of some of his good judge friends. Hopefully one without a TV history of espousing libertarian principles. Some undercover like Judge Roberts :)

WHAT? Justice Roberts has turned out to be pretty horrid.
 
Trump met with Napolitano because he believes a President Trump can profit using his office all he wants without violating the Constitution. He says this in the video linked below. The relevant Clause in the Constitution, usually called the Emolument Clause, is below, and isn't the one given in the Fox News article with the video clip of Nap saying this.
Article I, Section 9, Clause 8:
No Title of Nobility shall be granted by the United States: And no Person holding any Office of Profit or Trust under them, shall, without the Consent of the Congress, accept of any present, Emolument, Office, or Title, of any kind whatever, from any King, Prince, or foreign State.”

http://insider.foxnews.com/2016/11/...lings-violate-constitutions-emoluments-clause
 
Last edited:
Why's that crap?
maybe he's feeling guilty about giving his girlfriend an abortion?...


Well most people believe Trump is pro choice and only took pro life chances because he was running for the republican nomination. The assumption is that Trump would be nominating centrist supreme court judges due to his political ideology. He was basically just hoping the judge didn't disqualify himself in Trumps eyes from being considered for the supreme court, because we would want him on the supreme court.
 
Well most people believe Trump is pro choice and only took pro life chances because he was running for the republican nomination. The assumption is that Trump would be nominating centrist supreme court judges due to his political ideology. He was basically just hoping the judge didn't disqualify himself in Trumps eyes from being considered for the supreme court, because we would want him on the supreme court.

I don't think Napolitano being on the Supreme Court is an option.
 
Back
Top