Jesse's emails

[anewvoice]

We would be much better off if Benton would just shut up! Yes we are winning, despite Jesse Benton!

This

The e-mails serve no purpose for us, nothing at all. They clarify something we don't need clarification on. It's stunted great momentum, and changed the story from conquering conventions to suspending campaign. For us, the timing is a disaster, the message is demoralizing and its caused a furor which will kill the moneybomb tomorrow (yes, I'm donating).

What this tells me is, the e-mails were not targetting us. But to what end they were sent I cannot discern. I'm along for the ride so I'll withhold judgment until after but I sure hope there is a reason for this unwarranted action.

 

[Mckarnin]

Ron Paul has some major strengths that are seriously lacking in most candidates for the presidency, most notably his integrity, his intelligence and his ability to stand up for something that's right even when he is the lone voice doing so.

But you know, Ron Paul is no CEO. When you are running a campaign and have such strong grassroots support you need to keep a tight hold on your own ship so that at least officially you stay on message and present yourself properly. I have despised the nepotism exhibited by the campaign ever since I first began hearing of and trying to work with the "friends and family" RP campaign staff in 2008.

Hopefully future freedom candidates will have excellent people management skills. If not hopefully they'll understand that they need to go to the market and find a campaign manager with excellent management skills to supplement theirs rather than someone who needs a manager but instead gets to do whatever the heck he wants because there is next to no real oversight. In addition core campaign staff must have a high enough level of skill and personal integrity that they will support their candidate 100% as long as they are his employ. This hint dropping, establishment brown nosing on the side, trying to lay the groundwork for your next job when you haven't completed your current job type crap that some members of the RP staff appear to be doing reeks of an insecure and under-skilled campaign worker who wouldn't be competitive for their current job in the market.

Also, note to Ron Paul and other freedom candidate hopefuls..embracing personal liberty is not incompatible with requiring a high degree of personal accountability when it comes to your employee's execution of the duties for which they are paid.

 

[Publicani]

aa

 

[susano]

Ron Paul has some major strengths that are seriously lacking in most candidates for the presidency, most notably his integrity, his intelligence and his ability to stand up for something that's right even when he is the lone voice doing so.

But you know, Ron Paul is no CEO. When you are running a campaign and have such strong grassroots support you need to keep a tight hold on your own ship so that at least officially you stay on message and present yourself properly. I have despised the nepotism exhibited by the campaign ever since I first began hearing of and trying to work with the "friends and family" RP campaign staff in 2008.

Hopefully future freedom candidates will have excellent people management skills. If not hopefully they'll understand that they need to go to the market and find a campaign manager with excellent management skills to supplement theirs rather than someone who needs a manager but instead gets to do whatever the heck he wants because there is next to no real oversight. In addition core campaign staff must have a high enough level of skill and personal integrity that they will support their candidate 100% as long as they are his employ. This hint dropping, establishment brown nosing on the side, trying to lay the groundwork for your next job when you haven't completed your current job type crap that some members of the RP staff appear to be doing reeks of an insecure and under-skilled campaign worker who wouldn't be competitive for their current job in the market.

Also, note to Ron Paul and other freedom candidate hopefuls..embracing personal liberty is not incompatible with requiring a high degree of personal accountability when it comes to your employee's execution of the duties for which they are paid.

Well said and I couldn't agree more with ALL of it.


Oh, and the OP is full of shit. OP makes a statement of fact about something he knows nothing about. Ron Paul is not a manager, let alone a micro-manager approving emails!

 

[Athan]

We always listen to every damned thing that comes from the campaign as well as the candidate. We're Ron Paul geeks, in case there's some confusion about that. We're like the Star Trek fans that analyze the color of the lights on the outside of the Romulan ships.

But I'm no convinced that all the emails are approved by Paul. Historically, he has been lax with that.

WHOA! WHOA! WHOA! Don't you DARE compare me to a Trekkie Angelatc! As a Star Wars "fan", you have drawn first blood, and just earned a -REP!
You vile... scruffy looking nerf herder!

 

[Athan]

...*sigh*

I need to calm down. This whole Benton thing is making me snappy. Like some sort of klingon worshipping trekkie. Deep breaths. Happy thoughts. Serenity now.

 

[MoneyWhereMyMouthIs2]

All Jesse's emails has been approved by Ron Paul

That's it. Don't shoot the messenger.

Unless you think that Ron is completely incompetent.

I suspect with this exit Ron has lost his place in history as the greatest freedom fighter.

NOT LIKE THIS! NOT LIKE THIS!

I regret I sent money to the campaign.

I don't. I'll be sending more on the 17th than I planned to otherwise. This was never going to be easy.

Keep fighting.

 

[Mckarnin]

I completely agree that in theory it is fine to have family working for you and non-family can be idiots. The problem is when family are idiots their firing/replacement will almost always be delayed much longer than that of a non-family member ever would be. Also, I would always be hesitant to hire family members when the funds they will be paid out of are donations entrusted to me rather than profits from my business. To hire family in a nationally publicized donation funded situation I would want them to be at the top of their game in the field to the extent that it seems "stupid not to hire one of the best _______ just because they're family".

There's nothing wrong with family members working for you. There are plenty of idiots among non-relatives as well.
I can't imagine this series of emails haven't been reviewed and approved by RP. Especially because they were not needed.

Whatever the price he got for the emails, it was too small.

Never before I saw Ron Paul made such a clear mistake!

 

[Dogsoldier]

Did anyone see that thread about the art of war?

"Put the army in the face of death where there is no escape and they will not flee or be afraid.There is nothing they cannot achieve."-The art of war

Well?Are we not in the face of death now with these recent happenings?

I'm gonna bring that thread back up!

 

[Mini-Me]

I completely agree that in theory it is fine to have family working for you and non-family can be idiots. The problem is when family are idiots their firing/replacement will almost always be delayed much longer than that of a non-family member ever would be. Also, I would always be hesitant to hire family members when the funds they will be paid out of are donations entrusted to me rather than profits from my business. To hire family in a nationally publicized donation funded situation I would want them to be at the top of their game in the field to the extent that it seems "stupid not to hire one of the best _______ just because they're family".

I think the biggest reason Ron Paul relies on family is because he wants someone he personally knows and trusts not to sell him out at a critical moment. I think he's aware that mercenaries would easily pull a Judas ("misunderstood Judas" interpretations aside) and sell him out without hesitation for a higher paycheck or promise from a powerful, entrenched figure. As a result, he has to settle for someone he knows, which drastically limits the competency range of his candidate pool.

Heck, even today, people are insinuating that Benton has deliberately sold him out at a critical moment, so just imagine what might happen have happened if Karl Rove were his campaign manager.

 

[JK/SEA]

Its not easy is it Patriots?

We keep going. They will have to put us all in jail, or worse. Clear the table, take a deep breathe. We've come too far to just give in to adversity, and perceived treachery, real or imagined. We are most likely in the most critical crossroad in this nations history. To say otherwise is treasonous, and to give up now is worthy of at least a severe flogging.

 

[Mckarnin]

I think the biggest reason Ron Paul relies on family is because he wants someone he personally knows and trusts not to sell him out at a critical moment. I think he's aware that mercenaries would easily pull a Judas ("misunderstood Judas" interpretations aside) and sell him out without hesitation for a higher paycheck or promise from a powerful, entrenched figure. As a result, he has to settle for someone he knows, which drastically limits the competency range of his candidate pool.

Heck, even today, people are insinuating that Benton has deliberately sold him out at a critical moment, so just imagine what might happen have happened if Karl Rove were his campaign manager.

Yes and no. I understand thinking of family as more trustworthy but I don't think that is necessarily true. Unskilled family members have a vested financial interest in leveraging what they do for Ron Paul into a significantly better job after the campaign is over and may be tempted to sell out or signal potential buyers with hints of disloyalty. Someone extremely skilled, who takes pride in their work as a campaign manager would probably take some professional pride in anything they could do to get a "fringe" candidate like Ron Paul exposure, media attention, etc even if they don't agree with him.

 

[Mini-Me]

Yes and no. I understand thinking of family as more trustworthy but I don't think that is necessarily true. Unskilled family members have a vested financial interest in leveraging what they do for Ron Paul into a significantly better job after the campaign is over and may be tempted to sell out or signal potential buyers with hints of disloyalty. Someone extremely skilled, who takes pride in their work as a campaign manager would probably take some professional pride in anything they could do to get a "fringe" candidate like Ron Paul exposure, media attention, etc even if they don't agree with him.

Perhaps. I think the point is that the trust issue is important and tricky to navigate though, so it's hard for me to fault Paul too much for sticking with "the devil he knew" instead of risking the devil he didn't know. I personally would have given Doug Wead more authority than Benton, and it's easy to see what Benton has mishandled, but we have no way of knowing for sure what might have lied beyond the other door either.

Granted, I would fault Ron Paul for not taking greater personal agency over his campaign. It would be nice if he were more attentive about these things and took the attitude: "Had to be me. Someone else might have gotten it wrong." His biggest flaw has always been trusting his underlings without holding them accountable, which is why I say he has more in common with Warren Harding than his delegate-based campaign strategy or general goodness. All that said, I don't think this is the time for focusing on that: We can cast blame when the dust settles and we know our heads from our asses, but in the meantime, we have more pressing matters to attend to, and maintaining morale is not the least of them.