Islam is not a RACE

Oh snap LE!

You gone done did it.

Prepare to be called a neocon, Israeli paid troll, etc by the RPF pc thought police!
 
I regard Islam as more of a cult

1. The founder lived by a different set of rules than are imposed on the followers
2. It is a roach motel, you can check in but never check out
3. Non followers are not considered worthy of any recognition of rights
4 Followers are to associate only with other followers

and so on
 
Farrah Prudence is a freelance writer, linguist and expert on Middle Eastern culture and Islamic religion. She lived in the Middle East for over 10 years and worked with the American military through JTF for 13 consecutive months in TSF DOCEX in Iraq. Farrah Attended McMaster University in Canada and is currently an Act! for America chapter leader. Born to a Muslim father and Catholic mother, who later converted, Farrah, despite of a fatwa on her head, is determined to educate people about the dangers of Islam and Shari'a Law.

The official Facebook page of the Jewish Task Force, Inc. (JTF).
JTF is a movement of right-wing Jews and righteous Gentiles who are committed to saving America and Israel.
Please join and "like" our Facebook page. Also please join our exciting JTF forum to help change history. You don't have to be Jewish to join. About half of our members are not Jewish.

What a surprise.:rolleyes:
 
At least 40% of American Muslims think Muslims must be governed by Sharia law, and not the US constitution, while at least 40% (and probably over half) of American Muslims think it should be illegal for ANYONE to criticize Muhammad. This also means that 40% of American Muslims are too stupid to realize that they think that ALL Americans must be governed by Sharia. I don't know about the rest of RPFers, but I personally support the US constitution. If supporting the constitution makes me an Islamophobe, then so be it. Btw, the US and Canada have the most moderate Muslims in the world. The numbers in any other country are worse. Jews and Catholics used to be just as fanatical as the Muslim majority is today, but they secularized and modernized. Maybe in five million years Islam will grow up, too.

http://downtrend.com/robertgehl/pol...-want-people-who-criticize-islam-put-to-death
http://www.answering-islam.org/Authors/Arlandson/free_speech.htm
http://www.weaselzippers.us/222685-...ld-be-illegal-to-criticize-islam-or-mohammed/
http://www.jihadwatch.org/2012/10/4...ink-criticism-of-islam-should-be-criminalized
http://www.andrewbostom.org/2012/10/sixty-percent-of-us-muslims-reject-freedom-of-expression/

Why can't Islam be a race?

Because its an ideology. I'm not saying we should discriminate against Muslims at all; the majority of Muslims think non-Muslims should be discriminated against (let alone women, gays, adulterers, etc.). Defending bigotry doesn't make you tolerant. It makes you a bigot. You're a bigot.
 
Last edited:
water is not dry.

but Islamophobia MAY still be bigotry.

Muhammad called on his followers to kill all the Jews in order to bring about Judgment Day. Agree or disagree? I know its a tough question, [mod edit]The ppl who use the term "Islamophobia" are idiots who want to shut down debate. 90% of Islam's critics have nothing against individual Muslims, and you support silencing them? How about killing gays, or rape victims, or former Muslims, or critics of Islam? Should they be killed? Like I said, Islamophobia is bullshit, its not racism, its not even a real thing at all. You're participating in the intimidation and demonization of ppl who ACTUALLY believe in equality and tolerance. You're on the wrong side of this debate. Unless you want Jews to die, then you're exactly where you need to be, whining and bitching about Islamophobia.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Muhammad called on his followers to kill all the Jews in order to bring about Judgment Day. Agree or disagree? I know its a tough question, its not a headline that RPFers hate Jews and want them to quietly die without a protest, I just want to see if you're WITH the RPF majority that hates Jews, or not. The ppl who use the term "Islamophobia" are idiots who want to shut down debate. 90% of Islam's critics have nothing against individual Muslims, and you support silencing them? How about killing gays, or rape victims, or former Muslims, or critics of Islam? Should they be killed? Like I said, Islamophobia is bullshit, its not racism, its not even a real thing at all. You're participating in the intimidation and demonization of ppl who ACTUALLY believe in equality and tolerance. You're on the wrong side of this debate. Unless you want Jews to die, then you're exactly where you need to be, whining and bitching about Islamophobia.
I don't hate anyone. My comment has nothing to do with Israel or Jews. It has to do with not painting all people with the same brush.

Everyone who calls him/herself a Muslim is NOT a terrorist. The Old Testament calls on those of us who follow The Bible to do some things that Christians don't do too. I would hate to be judged by those who call for stoning adulterers and gay people in 2015. That's not me.
 
At least 40% of American Muslims think Muslims must be governed by Sharia law, and not the US constitution

What percentage of native-born, white, Christian Americans want to be governed by the US Constitution?

Recent elections results say ~1%.

Because its an ideology. I'm not saying we should discriminate against Muslims at all; the majority of Muslims think non-Muslims should be discriminated against (let alone women, gays, adulterers, etc.). Defending bigotry doesn't make you tolerant. It makes you a bigot. You're a bigot.

What proportion of native-born, white, Christian Americans would like to impose similarly discriminatory laws, on the basis of their own faith?

....well, more than 1%, anyway.
 
I don't hate anyone. My comment has nothing to do with Israel or Jews. It has to do with not painting all people with the same brush.

Everyone who calls him/herself a Muslim is NOT a terrorist. The Old Testament calls on those of us who follow The Bible to do some things that Christians don't do too. I would hate to be judged by those who call for stoning adulterers and gay people in 2015. That's not me.

But you endorse the term Islamophobia. This means you endorse the shaming of people who condemn Islamic supremacy. That's shameful. I NEVER said all Muslims are a terrorist, but I will say that most Muslims support violent, bigoted Sharia law, because its a fact that they do. http://www.pewforum.org/2013/04/30/...ligion-politics-society-beliefs-about-sharia/ I acknowledge that Jews and Catholics used to be fanatical extremists just like the majority of Muslims are today. You're the one here that wants to silence debate about Islam by endorsing the term "Islamophobia." You want a word to describe anti-Muslim bigotry? Well then don't use a word that was invented to silence debate on a fanatical death cult ideology. Islam is an idea, and its a stupid idea.
 
Last edited:
I don't hate anyone. My comment has nothing to do with Israel or Jews. It has to do with not painting all people with the same brush.

Everyone who calls him/herself a Muslim is NOT a terrorist. The Old Testament calls on those of us who follow The Bible to do some things that Christians don't do too. I would hate to be judged by those who call for stoning adulterers and gay people in 2015. That's not me.

It's very simplistic to simply say, "The Bible calls for this" and compare it to the Quran by leaving out context. The Old Testament law in the Bible is no longer necessary, as it was back in that day. Christians don't do it, not because they just don't care about the Bible that much, but because the teachings of Jesus made it clear that Old Testament law was covered by His sacrifice. If you can find the same kind of context in the Quran, then good for you, but I would encourage you to at least look at the context before making knee-jerk statements about the religion and saying people just don't follow it because to do so would be evil. Maybe there's a difference in the application of these scriptures that you're missing that makes a huge difference between the two.

But no, go ahead and keep painting all religions with the same brush just like some people paint all Muslims with the same brush. We all just have these books and we do somethings but not others because it's really just a guessing game which passages apply today and which ones don't. I would caution you against using this kind of dialogue since it's clear that you don't really know what you're talking about.
 
Muhammad called on his followers to kill all the Jews in order to bring about Judgment Day. Agree or disagree?

They never tried to kill me.

and by observation,, in my lifetime and for a good time before that ,,, they only fought with those that fought with them.

They did not invade,, bomb and destroy our country.. The US did that to them.
 
They never tried to kill me.

and by observation,, in my lifetime and for a good time before that ,,, they only fought with those that fought with them.

They did not invade,, bomb and destroy our country.. The US did that to them.

Well this definitely proves that your observations are stupid, because the Muslim caliphates were invading Europe since before the Catholic Crusades, including the wars over Turkey and the Balkans that lasted to, and included, World War I. And you can shrug off Muhammad's promise to kill all the Jews because "they never tried to kill me," but yet again, your ignorance doesn't protect the Jews who are in fact targeted and slaughtered by radicals who follow Muhammad's commands. All of Islam's ideological conquests were violent. You're simply ignorant about history. I'm not downplaying Jewish or Christian violence at all, btw; but you're downplaying Islamic violence on a massive, massive scale. This whole "it started in World War I" thing is a stupid leftist academic myth.



 
It's very simplistic to simply say, "The Bible calls for this" and compare it to the Quran by leaving out context. The Old Testament law in the Bible is no longer necessary, as it was back in that day. Christians don't do it, not because they just don't care about the Bible that much, but because the teachings of Jesus made it clear that Old Testament law was covered by His sacrifice. If you can find the same kind of context in the Quran, then good for you, but I would encourage you to at least look at the context before making knee-jerk statements about the religion and saying people just don't follow it because to do so would be evil. Maybe there's a difference in the application of these scriptures that you're missing that makes a huge difference between the two.

But no, go ahead and keep painting all religions with the same brush just like some people paint all Muslims with the same brush. We all just have these books and we do somethings but not others because it's really just a guessing game which passages apply today and which ones don't. I would caution you against using this kind of dialogue since it's clear that you don't really know what you're talking about.
Some think the OT is still very necessary.
http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showth...murder-by-government&highlight=Ashley+Madison
 
Last edited:

I don't mean to defame or insult you, but your use of the term "Islamophobia" is offensive, simply because the term itself is offensive. Its propagated by the Muslim Brotherhood, and its many allies and front groups, like al-Jazeera and CAIR (which was started for the purpose of fundraising for Hamas, the official Palestinian MB chapter, which promises to kill all the Jews). There actually are bigots who want to discriminate against Muslims in general, but the vast majority of the time "Islamophobia" is used, its used to silence legitimate criticism of barbaric, bigoted, supremacist Muslims. Responding to criticism of Islamic bigotry with "Not all Muslims are the same" is outrageous, because criticizing Islamic bigotry is not the same as asserting that all Muslims are bigots. To the contrary, you're accusing critics of bigotry of being bigots themselves; you're using fake tolerance to defend actual intolerance. If you really want Islam to reform, then step 1 is respecting ppl who criticize Islamic fanaticism, rather than insulting, shaming and silencing them as "Islamophobes." Calling ppl bigots for criticizing bigotry is just outrageous.

The greatest website in the history of the planet is TheReligionOfPeace.com, which is solely dedicated to criticizing Islam, but they repeatedly condemn discrimination against individual Muslims. Criticizing Islam is not criticizing all Muslims, and to imply as such by subscribing to this stupid "Islamophobia" bullshit is just absurd.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top