How Zionist Influence in New York Gave Rise to Zohran Mamdani

PAF

Member
Joined
Feb 26, 2012
Messages
13,965
by Matt Wolfson
Oct 14, 2025


Coverage of Zohran Mamdani’s run for New York City mayor is focused on the outsized politics at play in the race: democratic socialism, Islam, state-owned grocers, former Governor Andrew Cuomo, until recently incumbent Mayor Eric Adams, and President Donald Trump. But this risks missing the real story in New York, which is the decades-long creation and maintenance of a financialized, factionalized city of free market distortions and middle class displacement at the hands of powerful Zionists and their allies that led to backlash and Mamdani’s rise. Rewinding Mamdani’s catapault to politcal stardom reveals that New York’s current situation—its transition from a city hospitable to the working and middle classes and genuine free exchange of goods and services to a feudal one of government-backed financiers and service workers—is in many ways the work of a little more than a dozen Zionist financiers who twisted government to their ends.

Zionism in New York was part of a shift in the city begun by establishment-connected WASPs away from government by wards and organizers and toward rule by government-connected finance. The originator was Nelson Rockefeller, John D. Rockefeller’s grandson and the governor of New York from 1959 to 1973, who floated New York City’s bills by arranging for banks like Chase Manhattan (run by his brother David) to buy bonds. These new bonds covered the old bills even though the bonds were not backed by actual assets of the city’s but by anticipated returns; e.g. “tax anticipation bonds,” “bond anticipation notes,” and “moral obligation bonds.” This meant the city borrowed from the bankers, paid a portion of the interest, and borrowed again, while having no long-term way to pay back the full amount of ever-increasing debt.

.
.
.
.

Much more here:


 
"These new bonds covered the old bills even though the bonds were not backed by actual assets of the city’s but by anticipated returns; e.g. “tax anticipation bonds,” “bond anticipation notes,” and “moral obligation bonds.”

"This meant the city borrowed from the bankers, paid a portion of the interest, and borrowed again, while having no long-term way to pay back the full amount of ever-increasing debt."


I mean, "Full Faith and Credit"...
 
Last edited:
uber capitalism is a direct path to socialism and bolshevism. one way road.
 
In the context of this article, is there any distinction between Zionists and Jews? Why not just say Jews
 
Zionism in New York was part of a shift in the city begun by establishment-connected WASPs away from government by wards and organizers and toward rule by government-connected finance.
In the context of this article, is there any distinction between Zionists and Jews? Why not just say Jews

Good question. Something is not right about that article. It goes out of it's way to say "Zionist" over and over, yet there is never any connection made between the crony kleptocrats and banksters of NY, and Israel. It does seems to be a way to say "Jewish" by using Zionist instead.

While these crony corporatists are likely Zionists in terms of Israel, there was no connection made. Not all Zionists are billionaire bankers, or even Jewish.

Now if the major point of the article is that the popularity of communism is direct blowback from the corruption of the crony kleptocrats and banksters of New York, then that is probably accurate. The great Wall St. Bailout ("We are all socialists now"), and the subsequent Occupy Wall Street protests were the greatest gift ever to Bernie Sanders, the "Democratic Socialists", and the naked Marxists.
 
Social media is spreading Marxist ideology.

Thats where the people get their ideas from.

The people that control social media created the destructive mind virus in New York.

We the people let it happen by tolerating it.
 
While these crony corporatists are likely Zionists in terms of Israel, there was no connection made. Not all Zionists are billionaire bankers, or even Jewish.

That's a very good answer for that good question. And that reason has a valid corollary which is also relevant: Not all Jews are Zionist.
 
And how is that relevant to this article exactly?

Guess where this pic was snapped.

thumbs_b_c_6ea66acb3216d6ffafaeacacc72e51e7.jpg
 
Back
Top