Is it acceptable to vote for someone who doesn't support the constitution?

[Swmorgan77]

My answer is in my sig line.

 

[trey4sports]

absolutely.
if your voting for an anarcho-capitalist who would get rid of the constitution for a competely free market then i would definetly say yes

 

[Time for Change]

NO

 

[mport1]

Yeah, if they are pro-liberty candidates. I think it would be much better if they didn't support the document that gives government all of its power.

 

[Gigaplex]

The 14th. "nor shall any State deprive any person of life" This is what the left would say they interpret to be reason for universal health care. A bit of a stretch but proper health care is an effect on life. I'll reserve my right to disagree but I could see this topic as ill defined.

I'm not a lawyer, but especially in those 2 cases I see wiggle room.

You don't have to be a lawyer, you just have to use your head bone.

The 14th says that the state can not take actions that deprive a person of life. It does not say the state must take actions to improve a person's health.

If a person interprets this to mean the government can take over healthcare then their interpretation is incorrect. No they don't just have "a different viewpoint" - they have misunderstood the amendment. They are in error.

 

[Oyate]

well?

duuuuuuuuuuuuuuh yeah i wuz thinking of voting for duh devil.