Is a tiny NH town going to prove 2020 election fraud beyond a shadow of doubt?

[CaptUSA]

Not that I can tell so far.

In small NH towns the people who are in charge of storing and securing voting machines are, quite literally, literally little old church ladies.

I doubt they would have the means or the knowledge to tamper with the coding to gain these results.

I'm guessing the most feasible way would have been to send out a "service recall" of some sorts, either real or staged, to allow access to the machines sometime last year by techs with the required knowledge.

So, from what I've seen from some of those hacker conventions, you don't need to have direct access to the machines involved as long as they're connected to the net.

But, in order to be "beyond a shadow of a doubt", I think we're going to need to know when, how and who.

 

[tod evans]

Not that I can tell so far.

In small NH towns the people who are in charge of storing and securing voting machines are, quite literally, literally little old church ladies.

I doubt they would have the means or the knowledge to tamper with the coding to gain these results.

I'm guessing the most feasible way would have been to send out a "service recall" of some sorts, either real or staged, to allow access to the machines sometime last year by techs with the required knowledge.

If the tampering was done over the interwebs there's a record.......Getting said record when others move to obscure or hide it will prove to be interesting to say the least...

On a positive note, little ol' church ladies don't like to be played for fools so they're likely to be forthcoming.

 

[Contumacious]

Someone should ask Biden that if the election is overturned will he promise a peaceful transition of power.

Please remember that to

o·ver·turn

verb

2. abolish, invalidate, or reverse (a previous system, decision, situation, etc.): "the results overturned previous findings" synonyms cancel, reverse, rescind, repeal, revoke, ... moreantonyms allow, accept

Biden never won the election so there is NOTHING to overturn

He is an illegitimate - a usurper - President appointed by a Military Junta/Leftwing Cabal.

As Molly Ball admitted in Time Magazine the Cabal decided that stealing the election "needed" to be done and they did not have to follow the rules.

Its not a crime when the Demo Rats do it.



.

 

[A Son of Liberty]

Because he is a poorly camouflaged commie and his goal is to protect the system by getting its enemies to take themselves out of the game.

Trump did more to expose and destroy the system in 4 years than he and all the other "anarchists" around here have done in their entire combined lives.

You wouldn't know a commie if one was hanging from your shriveled, pathetic, vestigial ballbag.

Trump was AT BEST incidentally good for liberty OCCASIONALLY during his presidency. That we're even still discussing this here @ RPF's is really just an indictment of the pathetic state of the liberty movement.

And, for the record, I still consider it a fucking embarrassment that you continue to post here. [MENTION=40029]PAF[/MENTION] has done more for the cause of liberty than you by an order of magnitude, which I'll grant isn't much... unless gargling Trump's nuutz is a service to liberty... Tho' I will say that it's good that your post count is WAY down since November. That's definitely good for the cause of liberty.

 

[ClaytonB]

Please remember that to

o·ver·turn

verb

2. abolish, invalidate, or reverse (a previous system, decision, situation, etc.): "the results overturned previous findings" synonyms cancel, reverse, rescind, repeal, revoke, ... moreantonyms allow, accept

Biden never won the election so there is NOTHING to overturn

He is an illegitimate - a usurper - President appointed by a Military Junta/Leftwing Cabal.

As Molly Ball admitted in Time Magazine the Cabal decided that stealing the election "needed" to be done and they did not have to follow the rules.

Its not a crime when the Demo Rats do it.



.

+1

Hidden-cam footage of Beijing Biden just before he is about to sign some more EOs:

 

[donnay]

YouTube Censors Gateway Pundit, Locks Down Account After Posting Interview with New Hampshire Official on Stolen Votes from Voting Machines
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/20...pshire-official-stolen-votes-voting-machines/

 

[Swordsmyth]

What defines someone as "the wrong person"?

According to the Constitution, the winner is defined as the person who gets the majority of the votes of the electoral college. There is no dispute about how each and every elector from each and every state voted, and none of the allegations of fraud affect that.

If the election was fraudulent then they were not legitimate electors and the majority of legitimate electors voted for Trump.

 

[enhanced_deficit]

Two Questios.

1. Were same voting machines used in 2016 elections? If yes, why those elections were not messed with? Had Roget Stone or Netanyahu linked experts offered to watch over those elections as a courtesy in 2016 but did not in 2020?

2. Then Prez Trump had warned about election rigging 6 months or so in advance. Is a sitting Prez such a powerless puppet of upper management/Deep Pockets lobbies etc that his administration is unable to stop election rigging despite being aware of such plots 6 months in advance?

 

[Anti Federalist]

Two Questios.

1. Were same voting machines used in 2016 elections? If yes, why those elections were not messed with? Had Roget Stone or Netanyahu linked experts offered to watch over those elections as a courtesy in 2016 but did not in 2020?

2. Then Prez Trump had warned about election rigging 6 months or so in advance. Is a sitting Prez such a powerless puppet of upper management/Deep Pockets lobbies etc that his administration is unable to stop election rigging despite being aware of such plots 6 months in advance?

Number 1a - Yes, more than likely. My small town uses the same machines and I've been here over twenty years now.

1b - To parse that tortured English, I suspect "they" were under the impression that it was not needed. The "real" numbers were in line to carry Clinton to victory. Then again, maybe they were, in other states.

1c - I have no idea what Stone or NathanYahoo have to do with it, but Mrs. AF and I noted election shenanigans before 2008 in NH, significant shenanigans during the Paul primary in 2008 and ongoing since then. Very little attention is paid since it's a small state that usually has no influence other than the early primaries. So if you are asking "were the polls monitored for shenanigans" the answer is yes.

2a - Yes.

Most anybody in the "freedom movement" is opposed to the "imperial presidency".

But the fact is, we have one, and have had for many decades, at least since Truman.

And the fact is, and is now proved, that when placed in check against the power of the "Deep State/MIC/NWO" or whatever name you want to place on it, the imperial president is impotent and for the most part, powerless.

No matter what you think of Trump, he had the right enemies, and they are not finished with him yet. They will not rest until he is utterly disgraced, bankrupted and in prison. Or dead, but even then, the machine would continue after his family.

The generals are back in charge, and woe betide you peons if you ever forget that again.

 

[enhanced_deficit]

Number 1a - Yes, more than likely. My small town uses the same machines and I've been here over twenty years now.

1b - To parse that tortured English, I suspect "they" were under the impression that it was not needed. The "real" numbers were in line to carry Clinton to victory. Then again, maybe they were, in other states.

1c - I have no idea what Stone or NathanYahoo have to do with it, but Mrs. AF and I noted election shenanigans before 2008 in NH, significant shenanigans during the Paul primary in 2008 and ongoing since then. Very little attention is paid since it's a small state that usually has no influence other than the early primaries. So if you are asking "were the polls monitored for shenanigans" the answer is yes.

I was also thinking same machines and apparatus were in place in 2016 too and wondered how Trump win slipped through then if managed election outcome theory is accepted.
Well Roger Stone and team were very much in the middle of so called 2016 Election "Russian Interference" story, a great mix of news and fakenews that remained in media headlines for quite a while.

Trump political adviser Roger Stone defends his contacts with "Guccifer 2.0" who claimed responsibility for hacking the DNC
From:"Russian Interference": "Suspected Russian spy" Guccifer 2.0's phone was registered in Israel

Number 1a - Yes, more than likely. My small town uses the same machines and I've been here over twenty years now.

1b - To parse that tortured English, I suspect "they" were under the impression that it was not needed. The "real" numbers were in line to carry Clinton to victory. Then again, maybe they were, in other states.

1c - I have no idea what Stone or NathanYahoo have to do with it, but Mrs. AF and I noted election shenanigans before 2008 in NH, significant shenanigans during the Paul primary in 2008 and ongoing since then. Very little attention is paid since it's a small state that usually has no influence other than the early primaries. So if you are asking "were the polls monitored for shenanigans" the answer is yes.

2a - Yes.

Most anybody in the "freedom movement" is opposed to the "imperial presidency".

But the fact is, we have one, and have had for many decades, at least since Truman.

And the fact is, and is now proved, that when placed in check against the power of the "Deep State/MIC/NWO" or whatever name you want to place on it, the imperial president is impotent and for the most part, powerless.

EM.

This would be the most telling part, a POTUS has to be either a powerless puppet or incompetent to be able to see something like this in advance and still not being able to stop it.

He did make some great enemies but quite a few of his friends were also from swamp, champions of Forever Wars, Foreign-Firster lobbies even if remained mostly tamed or mired in chaos that had become a signature Trump administration trait.

I view him as a mixed bag. But 'Follow the money' angle is inescapable, he took money from globalist lobbies (his top donor was a Foreign-Firster Iran war pushing neocon) and besides half-hearted efforts didn't fully deliver. With the exception of couple of things (exposing of fakenews media and ability to communicate plainly), he sprinkled a touch of chaos, opportunism, short sightedness on almost everything he touched. Millions of livelihoods loss and massive big gummit debt spendathon happened on his watch in the "war against unseen enemy".
Final results of his efforts speak for themselves. Was better than HRC but that's a low bar.

 

[RJB]

I was also thinking same machines and apparatus were in place in 2016 too and wondered how Trump win slipped through then if managed election outcome theory is accepted.
Well Roger Stone and team were very much in the middle of so called 2016 Election "Russian Interference" story, a great mix of news and fakenews that remained in media headlines for quite a while.

Trump political adviser Roger Stone defends his contacts with "Guccifer 2.0" who claimed responsibility for hacking the DNC
From:"Russian Interference": "Suspected Russian spy" Guccifer 2.0's phone was registered in Israel




EM.

This would be the most telling part, a POTUS has to be either a powerless puppet or incompetent to be able to see something like this in advance and still not being able to stop it.

He did make some great enemies but quite a few of his friends were also from swamp, champions of Forever Wars, Foreign-Firster lobbies even if remained mostly tamed or mired in chaos that had become a signature Trump administration trait.

I view him as a mixed bag. But 'Follow the money' angle is inescapable, he took money from globalist lobbies (his top donor was a Foreign-Firster Iran war pushing neocon) and besides half-hearted efforts didn't fully deliver. With the exception of couple of things (exposing of fakenews media and ability to communicate plainly), he sprinkled a touch of chaos, opportunism, short sightedness on almost everything he touched. Millions of livelihoods loss and massive big gummit debt spendathon happened on his watch in the "war against unseen enemy".
Final results of his efforts speak for themselves. Was better than HRC but that's a low bar.

I mostly agree, but you forgot something:

 

[jmdrake]

What exactly did Trump do, that every single president before him hadn't done already?

Banning a gun accessory by executive order. Paving the way or the "warp speed" vaccine to be developed and distributed without adequate study or testing. Installing face scanning cameras at the airport.

Biden, on the other hand, is creating entirely new fascist precedents, and his Presidency has barely even gotten started:

e.g.: election fraud, censorship, witch hunts, big tech collusion, deplatforming, dissident suppression

Yeah Biden is awful. Trump squandered the chance to screw up Twitter. He could have gone to another platform like Mastodon while he was still president and the leftists would have had to follow. He could still do that but it would have less of an impaact.

 

[jmdrake]

It's looking likely.

This is happening in my backyard, gonna follow this closely.



THEY GOT CAUGHT: Dominion Owned Machines Removed 6% of Votes from Each Windham, New Hampshire GOP Candidate – Same Machines Used in 85% of Towns (VIDEO REPORT FROM NEW HAMPSHIRE)

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/20...andidate-machines-used-85-towns-video-report/

By Jim Hoft Published February 11, 2021 at 12:03pm

Video report here:
https://rumble.com/vdrbav-exclusive...ned-machines-removed-6-of-votes-from-eac.html

Here is a major update to our report on Wednesday on voter fraud in New Hampshire.

As we previously reported —

A recent hand recount in the Rockingham District 7 NH House Race in Windham, New Hampshire, found that the Dominion-owned voting machines shorted EVERY REPUBLICAN by roughly 300 votes.

The Dominion machine counted results were wrong for all 4 Republicans in Windham by almost exactly 300 votes.

Granite Grok reported:

The Town of Windham used Dominion machines to count paper ballots and upon a believable hand recount, it was confirmed each Republican was machine-cheated out of roughly 300 votes.

You would think this would have been solved by the Dominion machine company, the Secretary of State, the Elections Unit of the AG’s Office, or the laughable Ballot Law Commission. (Kathy Sullivan, d (Term expires July 1, 2024)

Nope.

Just like every other state that used machines that alter ballot counts in favor of one political party over another – here we are.

Dominion Voting Systems owns the intellectual property of the AccuVote machines used in New Hampshire.



Patch.com reported:

In New Hampshire, he noted, the AccuVote optical scanners used in all communities that have voting machines are an “older technology” and each moderator uses the device’s results tape, at the end of the night, to reveal the results, on a paper “Return of Votes” form. AccuVote devices have been used for more than a quarter of a century in the state and are the only devices approved by the Ballot Law Commission.

“The device was originally manufactured by Unisys, then by Global Elections Systems Inc., which are no longer in business,” Yen said. “The device used in New Hampshire is no longer being manufactured. Dominion (Voting Systems) owns the intellectual property of the AccuVote and its related election management system but does not manufacture the device.”


On Thursday we spoke with Dr. David Strang M.D., the Belknap County Republican Committee State Committee Member, New Hampshire GOP.

David told The Gateway Pundit that the Republican candidates in Windham had 6% of their total votes removed by the Dominion-owned voting machines.

According to Dr. Strang, these same Dominion-owned machines are used in 85% of the towns in New Hampshire.

What makes the New Hampshire results even more suspect:

** Republicans flipped the New Hampshire Senate from 14-10 Democrat to 14-10 Republican in 2020.
** Republicans flipped the New Hampshire House from 230-156 majority Democrat to 213-187 Republican majority in 2020!
** Yet, Joe Biden who was 4th in Dem primary and Kamala Harris, who did not make it to the Dem primary, won the state 52.7 to 45.4 to Trump.

These results are IMPOSSIBLE.

What Democrats did was skim 6% off each GOP candidate in each race where there was a recount.

This MUST BE investigated if we can EVER trust our election process again!

Despite these recent findings New Hampshire Attorney General Anne Edwards, a Republican, has no plans to investigate the alleged voter fraud in the state.

Please contact New Hampshire Attorney General’s office

NH Department of Justice
Anne Edwards, Attorney General
33 Capitol Street
Concord, NH 03301

Telephone: (603) 271-3658

Email: [email protected]

I love how the gateway pundit doesn't even read their own source.

Make your point.

...“The device was originally manufactured by Unisys, then by Global Elections Systems Inc., which are no longer in business,” Yen said. “The device used in New Hampshire is no longer being manufactured. Dominion (Voting Systems) owns the intellectual property of the AccuVote and its related election management system but does not manufacture the device.”

Right...they own and write the software for hardware that is no longer manufactured.

It is this software...or rather "line coding" since these things are so old, that is at issue here.

[MENTION=58229]TheCount[/MENTION]. What? No snarky comeback this time? Amazing! By the way, this is EXACTLY what I was trying to explain to you in that other thread. From the OP article.

A recent hand recount in the Rockingham District 7 NH House Race in Windham, New Hampshire, found that the Dominion-owned voting machines shorted EVERY REPUBLICAN by roughly 300 votes.

You tried to use the fact that Trump won in Dominion counties to prove there could not have been fraud. (I have not verified that fact but I'll take your word for it.) But Trump COULD have been shorted votes in strongholds, still "won" those couties, but the cumulative effect of that shorting could have tipped one or more key states into Biden's favor. As for the "hand recounts", not all of them were properly observed. If GOP observers were forced to be six feet away after being previously forced to be 20 FEET AWAY, then how to you ensure a proper recount? And check this out. A democrat town chair is currently under arrest and pending trial in the case of a forged abstenee ballot where the real voter later showed up and attempted to vote.

See: https://ctmirror.org/2020/11/13/voter-fraud-is-real-just-not-on-the-scale-claimed-by-trump/

Brandi said the scheme was uncovered by the ultimate check and balance: On election day, one of the voters whose name had been forged on an application turned up at the polls to vote. He was allowed to vote, but the absentee ballot cast in his name was impounded and referred to the State Elections Enforcement Commission.

The resulting investigation led to a criminal referral to the Chief State’s Attorney’s office and the arrest of John Mallozzi, who then was the Democratic town chair. His case is pending.

And yes, before you say it, I read the entire source and I know the article is being spun to claim that such actions are "rare." But think about it. The only way this fraud was uncovered is because the voter showed up to vote in person. Say if you only forged abstentee ballots for people that were still on the rolls but deceased? Or if you just looked into the voting history and and only forged abstentee ballots for people who hadn't voted in the past 8 years? What would be the REAL risk of getting caught in such a situation? And that doesn't even begin to get into the unsecured voting recepticals. There's nothing to stop someoe with a list of "likely republican voters" shreddig any mail in likely Trump ballot in the box.

And of course this brings me back to what I said about Elizabeth Warren and Amy Klobochar raisinng the red flag about electronic voting machines possibly being rigged to help REPUBLICANS in PENNSYLVANIA 2019!

From that letter:

https://www.warren.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/H.I.G. McCarthy, & Staple Street letters.pdf

In 2018 alone "voters in South Carolina [were] reporting machines that switched their votes after they'd inputted them, scanners [were] rejecting paper ballots in Missouri, and busted machines [were] causing long lines in Indiana."14 In addition, researchers recently uncovered previously undisclosed vulnerabilities in "nearly three dozen backend election systems in 10 states."15 And, just this year, after the Democratic candidate's electronic tally showed he received an improbable 164 votes out of 55,000 cast in a Pennsylvania state judicial election in 2019, the county's Republican Chairwoman said, " [ n ]othing went right on Election Day. Everything went wrong. These problems threaten the integrity of our elections and demonstrate the importance of election systems that are strong, durable, and not vulnerable to attack.

And:

Over the last two decades, the election technology industry has become highly concentrated, with a handful of consolidated vendors controlling the vast majority of the market. In the early 2000s, almost twenty vendors competed in the election technology market.4 Today, three large vendors-Election Systems & Software, Dominion Voting Systems, and Hart InterCiviccollectively provide voting machines and software that facilitate voting for over 90% of all eligible voters in the United States. 5 Private equity firms reportedly own or control each of these vendors, with very limited "information availabl~ in the public domain about their operations and financial perfonnance."6 While experts estimate that the total revenue for election technology vendors is about $300 million, there is no publicly available information on how much those vendors dedicate to research and development, maintenance of voting systems, or profits and executive compensation.

And Democrats attacked republican officials in 2017 for scrubbing the voting servers affter the election. And guess what? It now looks like George election servers have been tampered with again according to NBC News.

See: https://www.nbcnews.com/tech/securi...r-showed-signs-tampering-expert-says-n1117441

 

[Invisible Man]

If the election was fraudulent then they were not legitimate electors and the majority of legitimate electors voted for Trump.

Says who?

 

[Occam's Banana]

Trump squandered the chance to screw up Twitter. He could have gone to another platform like Mastodon while he was still president and the leftists would have had to follow. He could still do that but it would have less of an impact.

Those things would require Trump to have some sort of principled objective (or at least a consistent one).

But he seems to have been motivated primarily - perhaps even solely - by narcissistic self-regard.

Most of the good things about his Presidency seem to have been pretty much accidental. Most of the bad things, too, for that matter.

 

[Anti Federalist]

[MENTION=849]jmdrake[/MENTION]

Edit your "@" notice to "The Count" in post #93 or he won't see it.

 

[Occam's Banana]

https://twitter.com/insomnochick/status/1361153094395047936

 

[jmdrake]

[MENTION=849]jmdrake[/MENTION]

Edit your "@" notice to "The Count" in post #93 or he won't see it.

Thanks. I quoted him as well and so [MENTION=58229]TheCount[/MENTION] should have seen it. I think he just doesn't want to respond. Seriously I'm a bit surprised. [MENTION=64507]RJ Liberty[/MENTION] needs to read this one as well.

 

[jmdrake]

If the election was fraudulent then they were not legitimate electors and the majority of legitimate electors voted for Trump.

This is not the first election with fraud. In fact most have probably had it to some degree or another. The extent of it has not been proven. Certainly Trump did not win by the "largest landslide in history" as you falsely claimed on the other forum. Even by Trumps own estimates of flipped votes that is not true. Hyperbole and throwing people under the bus like Rand Paul who have done a good job of articulating the fraud without making claims he couldn't defend helps no one.

 

[Invisible Man]

https://twitter.com/insomnochick/status/1361153094395047936

This is incredible.