D.A.S.
Member
- Joined
- Aug 15, 2011
- Messages
- 2,082
Piers was just being Piers. He's no Larry King, that's for sure. I would have loved to see Larry interview Ron Paul instead of Piers. But, it was a pretty decent piece nonetheless. I was "annoyed" that Piers kept talking and talking instead of asking a question one at a time and waiting for a full answer, but Dr. Paul did a great job handling the interview. Just great. He looked very "Presidential", he kept up a smile, he delivered great answers, and combined serious matters with some light-hearted comments.
At least in this sort of an interview we have a shot at getting more democrats and independents to listen in and hopefully convert to Paul, or at least give him a consideration. Going on Hannity would have been a complete and total waste of time, as he would have badgered him a lot worse and would have totally twisted out his positions and would have actually made him look WORSE for coming there rather than skipping it altogether. Some interviews/forums are best skipped, and Hannity proves to be one of those.
At least in this sort of an interview we have a shot at getting more democrats and independents to listen in and hopefully convert to Paul, or at least give him a consideration. Going on Hannity would have been a complete and total waste of time, as he would have badgered him a lot worse and would have totally twisted out his positions and would have actually made him look WORSE for coming there rather than skipping it altogether. Some interviews/forums are best skipped, and Hannity proves to be one of those.