I am going to back Cruz.

lol, Wayne Madsen an investigative reporter said on Alex Jones today that Cruz got his money from investing in The Pines of Fire Island, the biggest gay porn production operation in the United States.
 
lol, Wayne Madsen an investigative reporter said on Alex Jones today that Cruz got his money from investing in The Pines of Fire Island, the biggest gay porn production operation in the United States.

Would not surprise me one bit if true.
 
lol, Wayne Madsen an investigative reporter said on Alex Jones today that Cruz got his money from investing in The Pines of Fire Island, the biggest gay porn production operation in the United States.

If true the media is going to hold on to it and have a field day with it at just the right time. I could see them playing his "NY values" sound byte while showing blocked out gay porn in the background. Too bad something like this was not blasted all over the media before Iowa.

Even if it comes out now it needs to be rubbed in the face of Iowans that voted for him that could be so easily duped by that phony. Maybe for the future people would not be so easily duped by campaigns playing to religion.
 
Would not surprise me one bit if true.

If you think about it, how did Cruz and Rubio both get their money and power? They started out without a pot to piss in. Rumors also that Rubio was in a gay porn movie. The plot just continues to thicken. Yet a really great true blue like Rand Paul can't get traction at all. Only gay pimps get anywhere near the White House.
 
If true the media is going to hold on to it and have a field day with it at just the right time. I could see them playing his "NY values" sound byte while showing blocked out gay porn in the background. Too bad something like this was not blasted all over the media before Iowa.

Even if it comes out now it needs to be rubbed in the face of Iowans that voted for him that could be so easily duped by that phony. Maybe for the future people would not be so easily duped by campaigns playing to religion.

Never !! The media wants a match up where Hillary can win. The media will promote whichever candidate has the worst chance to beat her, even with a rigged election.
 
He's going to make the Union great again.:rolleyes:

Abe%20Lincoln.jpg

Out of rep....again :(
 
lol, Wayne Madsen an investigative reporter said on Alex Jones today that Cruz got his money from investing in The Pines of Fire Island, the biggest gay porn production operation in the United States.

Your post prompted me to visit Wayne Madsen's website. I couldn't find anything about Cruz getting any of his personal wealth from that, but he did have an article about some gay people contributing to Cruz's campaign.

I notice that he also endorsed Trump for president. That's a shame. If he really is an investigative journalist, there are some things I'd love to see him dig into with that snake, like what monetary exchanges have been involved in some of his endorsements.
 
At face value, we should adore Ted Cruz. Hence, the problem. He has major authenticity problems. Take the facebook post and photo below.
How can any knowledgeable person let this one go by? The right handman to the Rockefellers!?!?

kissingercruz.png

trump-clinton-e1438913806896.jpg
 
If you think about it, how did Cruz and Rubio both get their money and power? They started out without a pot to piss in. Rumors also that Rubio was in a gay porn movie. The plot just continues to thicken. Yet a really great true blue like Rand Paul can't get traction at all. Only gay pimps get anywhere near the White House.

giphy.gif
 
I'm curious if any potential Cruz supporters have watched the video in the thread I posted at this beginning of this thread? It pretty thoroughly discredits Cruz as a liberty candidate, someone with any consistent views and as a human being as far as I'm concerned.

No and I really don't care to. I certainly don't think Cruz is the second coming. He's not Trump or the Clintons, so good enough.

Some people are overthinking this. My favored candidate is not going to win, so I will just vote against the ones I really dislike. I'd vote for any GOP except Trump.
 
Your post prompted me to visit Wayne Madsen's website. I couldn't find anything about Cruz getting any of his personal wealth from that, but he did have an article about some gay people contributing to Cruz's campaign.

I notice that he also endorsed Trump for president. That's a shame. If he really is an investigative journalist, there are some things I'd love to see him dig into with that snake, like what monetary exchanges have been involved in some of his endorsements.

Where did he get his personal wealth?
 
Your Signature Says Otherwise, If You're For Cruz

I stuck by Rand in the hopes he could pull it off but it is not happening and it is not going to happen.
Now it is flat out a choice between Cruz Trump Hillary Rubio or Bernie. To fend off the possibility of having to choose between Hillary Rubio, or Bernie over Trump, I have to back Cruz.
Rubio is rapidly going to collect the neoconservative branch and a good portion of the religious right. He is going to surge in NH and the news is going to run with that. Last thing I want is to get stuck in California with a choice between Trump and Rubio. As of now the era of the Paul's is over.
I respect the people sticking by Rand and salute you all for taking a hard stand for the most principled and honorable man running and out of respect to you all and Rand and Ron, I won't be posting anything about Cruz and I probably won't be around much at all anymore. It has been a wild ride these last 9 years Sometime euphoric and sometimes not so great but it has been a life experience.

Klamath, I find it hypocritical of you to quote this in your signature: "War; everything in the world wrong, evil and immoral combined into one and multiplied by millions," but then have you turn around and support a candidate (Ted Cruz) who has threatened to continue more wars in the Middle East through his calls for regime change and "carpet bombing them to see if sand can glow." That is the kind of inconsistency that we keep seeing from people who claim to be "liberty advocates," and you're allowing fear to undermine your own convictions about the carelessness and destruction of war. What a sad testimony you've given. :(
 
Klamath, I find it hypocritical of you to quote this in your signature: "War; everything in the world wrong, evil and immoral combined into one and multiplied by millions," but then have you turn around and support a candidate (Ted Cruz) who has threatened to continue more wars in the Middle East through his calls for regime change and "carpet bombing them to see if sand can glow." That is the kind of inconsistency that we keep seeing from people who claim to be "liberty advocates," and you're allowing fear to undermine your own convictions about the carelessness and destruction of war. What a sad testimony you've given. :(

Or maybe Klamath just thinks that Rubio is more pro war than Cruz, and because of that he/she wants to try to prevent Rubio from becoming the GOP nominee. I don't see why someone should get condemned here for wanting to prevent a full fledged neocon like Rubio from being the GOP nominee. The fact that Fox News is pushing Rubio rather than Cruz should tell you everything you need to know.
 
Last edited:
Or maybe Klamath just thinks that Rubio is more pro war than Cruz, and because of that he/she wants to try to prevent Rubio from becoming the GOP nominee. I don't see why someone should get condemned here for wanting to prevent a full fledged neocon like Rubio from being the GOP nominee. The fact that Fox News is pushing Rubio rather than Cruz should tell you everything you need to know.

Condemned due to the fact that Cruz' campaign said that their winning strategy was to target and spread disinformation and ambiguity among Rand supporters back in like may?
 
Or maybe Klamath just thinks that Rubio is more pro war than Cruz, and because of that he/she wants to try to prevent Rubio from becoming the GOP nominee. I don't see why someone should get condemned here for wanting to prevent a full fledged neocon like Rubio from being the GOP nominee. The fact that Fox News is pushing Rubio rather than Cruz should tell you everything you need to know.

Ya, I don't think so. That fact that any one of the "noooos" channels are or are not pushing the candidate de jure doesn't say much of anything and it's nothing to base your vote on. Cruz is not one bit better than Rubio, he's just playing to a different audience. The fact that anyone here can come to the conclusion that he is somehow the lesser evil I find pretty amazing. Take off the blinders.
 
Back
Top