State at Large, KY?
What does that mean? On the notary stamp.
Understand that the following is regarding the superficial appearance of the affidavit itself, and not regarding the merits of Mr. Adams's argument.
That Mr. Adams and the notary public who witnessed and verified his signature on the affidavit reside in Kentucky? The top of the affidavit specifies that Mr. Adams now resides in Bowling Green Kentucky, so it seems only natural that a notary public of his choosing would reside in that same state. I am not stating any kind of opinion one way or the other as to the merits of his argument, but the affidavit itself appears to be superficially legitimate, assuming that Mr. Adams is in fact who he claims to be, and excepting that I do not see a notary commission number or serial number on the imprinting device itself.
Whether the statement he has sworn to in the affidavit itself is true or false, will be up to the determination of a court, should an offended party (Mr. Adams, President Obama, or one of several Hawaii administrators or bureaucrats) choose to pursue legal action for libel. The fact that the notary stamp reveals the notary is from Kentucky is irrelevant to the legitimacy of the affidavit itself.
Bottom line is that there are only four possibilities here:
1) the affidavit is faked, and this is not the Tim Adams who (allegedly) worked as a senior official of the Hawaii Board of Elections
2) the affidavit is real, but Mr. Adams is lying and has therefore subjected himself to serious liability to include fines and imprisonment
3) the affidavit is real, and Mr. Adams is telling the truth as he personally understands it, but he has misinterpreted the evidence
4) the affidavit is real, and Mr. Adams is telling the truth as he personally understands it, which is a correct interpretation of the evidence.
I, for one, will withhold judgment on the merits of the argument, and state simply that after having reviewed the PDF scans of the affidavit itself, it superficially appears to be genuine, assuming that the (alleged) notary-verified signature belongs to the same Tim Adams as being the Tim Adams (who we must assume) was a senior election official in Hawaii in 2008.
The one thing that leads me to suspect the possibility of this being faked, is the lack of a commission number in the notary's signing statement, or a serial number in the notary's seal. Most states, such as North Carolina, require the presence of a commission mumber, or Montana, the attachment of a serial number to the notary's seal imprint.
There is simply no such number anywhere in the notary block of this document. Maybe Kentucky is one of the few states who require only the notary's name, seal, and signature alone? There is a reason that most States require a commission number or a seal serial number, as a primary protection against fraud. Perhaps someone here more familiar with Kentucky can enlighten us as to the State requirements for commission numbers or seal serial numbers?