DerailingDaTrain
Member
- Joined
- Dec 3, 2011
- Messages
- 2,738
I laugh at those words when I read them. ^ The document isn't forged.
This kind of upset me, and has me wondering what's up with this entire story.So is Dr. Paul a Democrat partisan for being anti-war? The guilt-by-association line of thinking is flimsy at best.
If you are a Constitutionalist, then it's an important issue. If you think it's OK to ignore the Constitution, then it's not.
The Constitution says the President has to be a natural born citizen. Challenged to prove he met this qualification, he produced a forged document.
Why produce a forged document if he was really a natural born citizen? Why also are all of his other records that would indicate citizenship under lock and key?
Where there's smoke, there's fire, and Obama is chain smoking.
Actually he did a rare flip-flop on the eligibility issue
---------------------
Ron Paul: Obama's Constitutional Eligibility To Be President Is Irrelevant - 4/20/11
"We should know the truth and we should follow the rule, we should follow the law, we should follow what the Constitution says about who is qualified to be President. So, I am very open-minded about looking at all of that."
- Ron Paul
Attacking the messenger never works as planned.For those unfamiliar with Sheriff Joe Arpaio I suggest you do some reading to find out what type of person he really is:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maricopa_County_Sheriff's_Office_controversies#Joe_Arpaio
Attacking the messenger never works as planned.
What do you think of post #62 ?
And what do you think of RP saying it should be investigated on 08, and then in 11 stating it is irrelevant ?We followed the law and investigated and found out that he is a citizen. Ron himself would say that Obama was born here if asked. Here is a quote from an article about this "new evidence":
On March 1, 2012, Arpaio announced the investigation had found that "probable cause exists indicating that forgery and fraud may have been committed" in the release of Obama's Hawaiian birth certificate. A Hawaiian official stated that no one from Arpaio's office ever requested to inspect or collect documents related to the authenticity of Obama's birth certificate. The Phoenix New Times noted Arapio's report contained a "grand total of zero new information" and that everything in the report has already been debunked
Even Donald Trump backed off after the long form certificate was released why can't you just leave it alone? Do you honestly think this will ever lead to anything? RNC Chariman Steele, Sarah Palin, Limbaugh, all of them no longer talk about this because it made them look bad when the evidence came out that he was an American born citizen. Even the McCain/Palin campaign rejected it as false and decided not to use it in attack ads during the election.
And what do you think of RP saying it should be investigated on 08, and then in 11 stating it is irrelevant ?
That's what I am getting at, so don't tell me what he would say if asked.
Because he clearly thought it should be investigated, and gave justification, then 3 years later, he's promoting the line this administrations wants people to hear.
The issue is irrelevant, and so is the Constitution, if there is truth to the accusation and it is ignored ... YES ?
Who investigated it and thus allowed RP to develop this conclusion ?He was asked by a birther if it should be investigated and Ron looked to the Constitution (like always) for the answer and stated:
"We should know the truth and we should follow the rule, we should follow the law, we should follow what the Constitution says about who is qualified to be President. So, I am very open-minded about looking at all of that."
All that means is if there is any probable cause (or reasonable susp. depending on where you're at) it should be investigated because the Constitution says that the President must be a natural born citizen and if he wasn't that would in violation of the Constitution. It was investigated and proven that he is in fact an American citizen who was born in Hawaii.
Who are you to tell anyone that what has been presented is not valid ?For decades, a fossil skull discovered in Piltdown, England, was hailed as the missing link between apes and humans. Entire careers were built on its authenticity. Then in 1953, the awful truth came out: "Piltdown Man" was a fake! But who done it? In "The Boldest Hoax," NOVA gets to the bottom of the greatest scientific hoodwinking of all time.
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/hoax/
The Smithsonian Institute created an entire family based on a HOAX.
When new evidence was made available, it upset many people and ruined careers.
Who are you to tell anyone that what has been presented is not valid ?
He's a duly elected official, and is as credible as any other elected official.This has nothing to do with Obama or his citizenship or the forging of documents. I don't even see how you can think this relates to the conversation. Please tell me why you consider Joe Arpaio a credible person and trust him to defend the Constitution when he clearly hasn't read it?
He's a duly elected official, and is as credible as any other elected official.
I live in his State, and IMO, those who attempt to discredit his actions are in favor of amnesty, or are strong supporters of Obama and the progressive movement.lol have you not watched the videos that I posted or read anything about him? Anyone who believes that Joe is a credible individual clearly doesn't know anything about him, his views, or his history.
I live in his State, and IMO, those who attempt to discredit his actions are in favor of amnesty, or are strong supporters of Obama and the progressive movement.
Yet none of this changes the aspect of a Sheriff, one of the highest LE positions within this country stating that probable cause exists, and that Congress should investigate.
Do you have a problem with knowing the truth ?
lol have you not watched the videos that I posted or read anything about him? Anyone who believes that Joe is a credible individual clearly doesn't know anything about him, his views, or his history.
Credible or not. As long as they can prove it in court is all I care about![]()
You did pick a good username, the problem is you fall for whatever suits your purpose, and ignore the desire for truth.Edit: I replaced my big response with this. Reading some of your other posts in different threads it has already been made clear by others that you are anti-immigration (not just illegals but all immigrants). So in response I offer my hearty laugh at your ignorance instead. lol if you don't like Sheriff Joe and his horrible ignorant policies then you are a progressive liberal lover! I think it is time to get some new tin foil for your hat.
Thus solidifying the aspect that you do not desire to know the truth, and are not willing to defend the Constitution.Credible or not. As long as they can prove it in court is all I care about![]()
They don't have a snow balls chance in Hell.