Good News for Paul - Fred gives up on New Hampshire

Ridiculous

Member
Joined
Aug 16, 2007
Messages
1,148
Fred Thompson is done with New Hampshire

Thompson has no events scheduled in New Hampshire through the end of the year.
Fred knows he doesn't stand a chance.

The only negative I can see is that if Paul doesn't take first, they press will say, "well Thompson did give up on that state early so there were less contenders"

December 11, 2007
WASHINGTON (CNN) — Fred Thompson has decided to abandon the Granite State, and will campaign in Iowa full-time until the January 3 caucuses.

The former Tennessee senator is planning to begin a bus tour of the Hawkeye State next week that will run through the end of the year, with a brief break for the Christmas holiday, campaign spokesman Jeff Sadosky tells CNN.

A "strong finish" in Iowa "will allow us to springboard into South Carolina, Florida and the rest of the February 5 states in a very strong position," said Sadosky.

The move represents an about-face from Thompson's position as recently as last month, when the New York Times reported that he responded to complaints from New Hampshire voters that he hadn’t spent enough time there with promises to visit "early and often."

– CNN’s Rebecca Sinderbrand
 
I'd spend more time at home if I was that old with a hottie wife at home.
 
Thompson's lack of support here was going nowhere. Really - NO ONE I talked to, Democrat, Independent or Republican had anything to say positive about the man. This is a state where nearly everyone does so much research on the candidates that we can find something we like and something we dislike in every candidate (Of course, I'm still looking for a positive about Willard :) ). Still - nothing.

JM
 
That's bad news for Paul. Fred isn't drawing votes away from us, he's drawing votes away from the other neo-con frontrunners. The more split their vote is, the easier there will be a win for us.
 
That's bad news for Paul. Fred isn't drawing votes away from us, he's drawing votes away from the other neo-con frontrunners. The more split their vote is, the easier there will be a win for us.


Bingo! "Bring out your neocons, bring out your neocons..."
 
Thompson's lack of support here was going nowhere. Really - NO ONE I talked to, Democrat, Independent or Republican had anything to say positive about the man. This is a state where nearly everyone does so much research on the candidates that we can find something we like and something we dislike in every candidate (Of course, I'm still looking for a positive about Willard :) ). Still - nothing.

JM

how is Paul's support on the ground,face to face? percentage wise? Be honest.
 
This is bad news, some would have drawn votes away from Romney.

on the plus,Chuckabee and Frudy are creeping up, and McCain has suppport too.

But, we need to finish first. NH is a libertarian state. If we can't win NH, against 5 neocons, than were in trouble. I wish Paul would spend night ad day there now.
 
NH voters really hate southern politicians. The Huckster will find that out the hard way if he insists on contesting NH.


.
 
Yet the pollsters say he is ahead of Paul nationally

the whole poll game is a fiasco designed to make perception a reality. Fred will win 0 primaries. Huckabee cannot win any state west of the Rockies. Ghouls is a nynj guy and Mitt will get a few scattered. Forget McCain. Who is left?
 
from what I've been seeing NH does not deserve the motto "live free or die".

-adrian
 
how is Paul's support on the ground,face to face? percentage wise? Be honest.

Honestly, if we had an IRV system in this country, we'd have a landslide. He really seems to be in the top three choices for nearly everyone. That said, we don't have an IRV system.

His biggest strengths are him messages to get out of Iraq and end the income tax. Both seem to be playing VERY well here. His biggest weakness - the abortion issue. I'm not saying he's wrong about it, but the fact is that the Inds here are very pro-choice.

I did a pretty extensive research and number crunching with the best figures I could find and wrote it up in a post called "What if the Polls are right?" In it, Ron came out with 19% if the election were held today AND we have the same turnout as the other candidates. That also sounds about right to me from a gut feeling. I'd say he would most likely beat ghoul here and show third place if the election were held today, behind Willard and McCain. Beating McCain is a real possibility if the election were today, and we stand a good chance of winning it all here IF we can get Ron another big blast or two of positive news coverage AND if he comes back a few more times.

Now here's the good news - the best thing that ever happened for Ron in this state was the 11/5 moneybomb. Since that date, I have not heard a SINGLE person here say he can't win. I'm not saying that it is guaranteed, but I can tell you life is pretty sweet beyond the "he can't win" mirror. ;) Now, if we only had some sort of other moneybomb planned soon... Something to go over, say, $6.4 million..... ;) :D

JM
 
Back
Top