Dynamic Threats To Constitutional Government-solution

You can say that, but you do not have the intent of the Declaration of Independence behind you. Such intent led to Article V, which means you are part of a group here working against unity that can alter or abolish the federal government.

stop playing with the shills! be a man and finish the fight you picked with me!!!! :mad:
 
You can say that, but you do not have the intent of the Declaration of Independence behind you. Such intent led to Article V, which means you are part of a group here working against unity that can alter or abolish the federal government.

When you've got it abolished halfway I'll probably join in for the remainder (if I'm still alive).

Go and fight with the Arkansas A/C service guy. LOL!
 
Last edited:
When you've got it abolished halfway I'll probably join in for the remainder (if I'm still alive).

Go and fight with the Arkansas A/C service guy. LOL!

You would assume it needs to be abolished. I'm not so sure of that. Some severe alterations might make it work okay.

One thing is for sure, alterations will have to be tried, then if it turns out it's as dangerous as it's been, then abolition is in order.

Currently to many of the people are dependent on it, so altering it to a degree where the people become educated and independent is wise.

It doesn't matter what kind of government you have; or no government at all; if the people do not have the knowledge to survive, they suffer. Tyrants impose ignorance to create dependence if they can't outright dominate with fear of death and violence.

Your efforts have no planned order, so by default, they will lead to immense suffering, and perhaps the mounting of violent tyranny, because you certainly aren't seeing to the education of people.

You are not thinking about people and their needs. I am. With unity and a lawful peaceful revolution, we can impose our majority will upon the government and first purify it of unconstitutional officials, then restore the republic it was intended to be with constitutional intent. From that position, after a good degree of education over mass media converted from exploitation and manipulation to education and guidance with real information to form accurate opinion with, democracy can slowly shape the republic into dinething that might be able to abolish itself, after creating a people that can fully take care of themselves.

Currently, they do not even know that free speech has a vital purpose. Including you.
 
You would assume it needs to be abolished. I'm not so sure of that. Some severe alterations might make it work okay.

One thing is for sure, alterations will have to be tried, then if it turns out it's as dangerous as it's been, then abolition is in order.

Currently to many of the people are dependent on it, so altering it to a degree where the people become educated and independent is wise.

It doesn't matter what kind of government you have; or no government at all; if the people do not have the knowledge to survive, they suffer. Tyrants impose ignorance to create dependence if they can't outright dominate with fear of death and violence.

Your efforts have no planned order, so by default, they will lead to immense suffering, and perhaps the mounting of violent tyranny, because you certainly aren't seeing to the education of people.

You are not thinking about people and their needs. I am. With unity and a lawful peaceful revolution, we can impose our majority will upon the government and first purify it of unconstitutional officials, then restore the republic it was intended to be with constitutional intent. From that position, after a good degree of education over mass media converted from exploitation and manipulation to education and guidance with real information to form accurate opinion with, democracy can slowly shape the republic into dinething that might be able to abolish itself, after creating a people that can fully take care of themselves.

Currently, they do not even know that free speech has a vital purpose. Including you.


Free speech?...how about this for free speech. Your 'rhetoric' is 'drool donkey' bloody pus drippings.

am i in your club now?
 
You would assume it needs to be abolished. I'm not so sure of that. Some severe alterations might make it work okay.

One thing is for sure, alterations will have to be tried, then if it turns out it's as dangerous as it's been, then abolition is in order.

Currently to many of the people are dependent on it, so altering it to a degree where the people become educated and independent is wise.

It doesn't matter what kind of government you have; or no government at all; if the people do not have the knowledge to survive, they suffer. Tyrants impose ignorance to create dependence if they can't outright dominate with fear of death and violence.

Your efforts have no planned order, so by default, they will lead to immense suffering, and perhaps the mounting of violent tyranny, because you certainly aren't seeing to the education of people.

You are not thinking about people and their needs. I am. With unity and a lawful peaceful revolution, we can impose our majority will upon the government and first purify it of unconstitutional officials, then restore the republic it was intended to be with constitutional intent. From that position, after a good degree of education over mass media converted from exploitation and manipulation to education and guidance with real information to form accurate opinion with, democracy can slowly shape the republic into dinething that might be able to abolish itself, after creating a people that can fully take care of themselves.

Currently, they do not even know that free speech has a vital purpose. Including you.
No assume about it.
 
Free speech?...how about this for free speech. Your 'rhetoric' is 'drool donkey' bloody pus drippings.

am i in your club now?

Not my club. You are in the club that is against a lawful and peaceful revolution that defends the constitution and restores government under it. But you knew that.
 
Not my club. You are in the club that is against a lawful and peaceful revolution that defends the constitution and restores government under it. But you knew that.

really?..wow...guess i wasted my time with Ron Paul then...i got elected to PCO, then became a State Delegate, donated hundreds to Ron, and you have the fucking temerity to come in here and insult true Patriots, this board, and Ron Paul with your broad brush ignorant rhetoric.

You sir are nothing but a weak kneed wannabe, and you should give evidence of what your 'activist' line of thinking has accomplished besides shitting on this forum.

In closing....go suck a sour pickle. Shouldn't be too difficult for ya....
 
Last edited:
From a post in another, now closed, thread.

http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?473673-Live-now-Baltimore-looting-burning-rioting/page33

Originally Posted by Christopher A. Brown

Curious, that the only person who has a solution and plan to address this wide spread problem is myself.

No, you are not the only one, with the only solution.

There are many people, working on many different angles, at many different levels, attacking this issue from many different directions.

Each have their pros and cons, each have their proper moments to be used.

All need to be used, no stone left unturned.
 
Last edited:
From a post in another, now closed, thread.

http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?473673-Live-now-Baltimore-looting-burning-rioting/page33

Curious, that the only person who has a solution and plan to address this wide spread problem is myself.

Another satisfied customer of One True Path to Liberty®!

Christopher A. Brown has his. Have you got yours?

Don't be a cog-infil agent!! Get your One True Path to Liberty® today!
 
really?..wow...guess i wasted my time with Ron Paul then...i got elected to PCO, then became a State Delegate,

You can post lots of BS, that's for sure.

But can you reasonably respond to a single question?

Do you agree and accept the ultimate purpose of free speech is to enable unity adequate to alter or abolish government destructive to unalienable rights?
 
Another satisfied customer of One True Path to Liberty®!

Christopher A. Brown has his. Have you got yours?

Don't be a cog-infil agent!! Get your One True Path to Liberty® today!

OB, thanks for the PR tip! I've got the hang of it.


Yes! Cease being influenced by covert agents pretending to care about the constitution and liberty. You too can envision a constitutional republic and assure the tyrants of Walmartia cannot complete their plot of dominance!

End that putrid smell around your television, newspaper and computer, especially while while logged into forums. Even this one.

With your dedicated use of this fully lawful plan, personally guaranteed by Thomas Jeffereson himself, you will proudly and safely walk the
One True Path to Liberty®!

Accept no fakes, experience the breathless feeling of hope investing in the fact that all Americans, even morons and young children can readily accept without hesitation!

Rest assured that all of your pissing and moaning will amount to a new golden age for Americans, if not all of humanity when freedom of speech gains an official purpose! Your One True Path to Liberty® package contains simple easy to understand steps that assure Americans can lawfully, completely control government, even abolish it if our steps to liberty are not carefully followed by the wanna-be despots now yanking your chain.

See free speech gain profound purpose.

See your carefully cast vote finally mean something!

End the scurrilous corrupt funding of political campaigns forever.

Accept no substitutes, no empty plans, only invest in this path carefully carved out of the framing documents for you and your loved ones to follow into our glorious future.
 
Last edited:
really?..wow...guess i wasted my time with Ron Paul then...i got elected to PCO, then became a State Delegate,

You can post lots of BS, that's for sure.

But can you reasonably respond to a single question?

Do you agree and accept the ultimate purpose of free speech is to enable unity adequate to alter or abolish government destructive to unalienable rights?


JK/SEA cannot reasonably respond to a single question without exposing himself as opposing the constitution and defense of the rights under it. But JK/SEA can make neg rep comments that are comprised of exactly what the comment accuses me of.

JK/SEA;neg rep said:
brilliant...bravo..more ignorant bullshit...but then you knew that.

This unaccountability is treasonous.
 
Last edited:
From a post in another, now closed, thread.

http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?473673-Live-now-Baltimore-looting-burning-rioting/page33



No, you are not the only one, with the only solution.

There are many people, working on many different angles, at many different levels, attacking this issue from many different directions.

Each have their pros and cons, each have their proper moments to be used.

All need to be used, no stone left unturned.

Umm, you left out addressing the "widespread part".

Angles, yes, lots of them. But nothing that is comprehensive to ALL of the issues. That requires a government responsive to the people because the people are too divided on all the angles. We can agree however, that government is not constitutional, making many more problems instead of solving them.
 
stop playing with the shills! be a man and finish the fight you picked with me!!!! :mad:

Judging from your terms used in posting recently; and your failure to answer certain key questions, which you appropriately noticed, without saying so; but the change in terms and perspective indicates realization, that the fight was different than you thought it was.

It is still different, but the fact you realized enough to move perspective is a good indication of sincerity.

As I've said many times. Agents do not have oppose everything the people are doing to stop the them from defending, enforcing and restoring the constitution over government, they only have to block the routes of success.

What is critical to the American peoples success is a capacity to define constitutional intent.

You asked in another thread, "Why do you keep adding an (s) to intent?".

I do so because their are a number of intents, just as their are a number of unalienable rights. However, there is only a set of intents that are vital to constitutional defense and the beginning of enforcement.

Those are; the right to alter or abolish and the means to unify effectively to get the job done.

Freedom of speech serves the purpose of unity and it serves to inform after implemented under the logic of preparatory amendment. Once the purpose of free speech is restored in this society, the rest is a snowball, and the infiltration that abandoned the 1787 constitution know it.

Therefore agents are SPECIFICALLY directed to act in ways that interfere in the purpose of free speech, which primarily creates an understanding. Hence the term "cognitive infiltration". Understanding is a requisite for unity.

Now, if your understanding has reached a point of comprehension that includes the wildfire simplicity of what is really a trident of freedom, because triple edged swords don't work for mortals, you are ready to fully separate yourself from the infiltrations misleading.

That said, do you agree and accept that the ultimate purpose of free speech is to enable unity adequate to alter or abolish government destructive to unalienable rights?
 
dammit Chris, i'm writing letters as fast as i can...lighten up. Could you send me some money for stamps please?...tx...
 
Back
Top