stop playing with the shills! be a man and finish the fight you picked with me!!!!
Judging from your terms used in posting recently; and your failure to answer certain key questions, which you appropriately noticed, without saying so; but the change in terms and perspective indicates realization, that the fight was different than you thought it was.
It is still different, but the fact you realized enough to move perspective is a good indication of sincerity.
As I've said many times. Agents do not have oppose everything the people are doing to stop the them from defending, enforcing and restoring the constitution over government, they only have to block the routes of success.
What is critical to the American peoples success is a capacity to define constitutional intent.
You asked in another thread, "Why do you keep adding an (s) to intent?".
I do so because their are a number of intents, just as their are a number of unalienable rights. However, there is only a set of intents that are vital to constitutional defense and the beginning of enforcement.
Those are; the right to alter or abolish and the means to unify effectively to get the job done.
Freedom of speech serves the purpose of unity and it serves to inform after implemented under the logic of
preparatory amendment. Once the purpose of free speech is restored in this society, the rest is a snowball, and the infiltration that abandoned the 1787 constitution know it.
Therefore agents are SPECIFICALLY directed to act in ways that interfere in the purpose of free speech, which primarily creates an understanding. Hence the term "cognitive infiltration". Understanding is a requisite for unity.
Now, if your understanding has reached a point of comprehension that includes the wildfire simplicity of what is really a trident of freedom, because triple edged swords don't work for mortals, you are ready to fully separate yourself from the infiltrations misleading.
That said,
do you agree and accept that the ultimate purpose of free speech is to enable unity adequate to alter or abolish government destructive to unalienable rights?