Ron Paul Fan
Member
- Joined
- Jul 26, 2007
- Messages
- 3,005
In so far as USA Today, it was founded on the premise of "less is better". They knew that trend then and for the future, that a large segment of the poulation are and will be reading less. Have a look at their stories vs. the same coverage in let's say the NY Times.
My opinion is also that it appears clutterd, and does not lend itself to USA Today's reader.
Many thanks again for what you have done.
No no no. USA Today readers like pictures. They like different and creative. When they see this ad they'll say, "Hey! This blends in really nice with the rest of the newspaper, yet it's creative enough to catch my fancy! Who is this guy, Ron Paul? Never heard of him, but I will now read this fantastically put together ad and learn more! Thanks llepard!"
And then they will read the ad, go to ronpaul2008.com and donate and we all live happily ever after. It's like shooting fish in a barrel. USA Today readers aren't stupid. They are business travelers and hotel stayers. They will have a lot of down time and will need something interesting to read and as I said, you could read this ad for days and not get bored. It would be a shame to eliminate anything from this beautiful ad because it is perfect for our target audience.