DC Police Chief Responds to Adam Kokesh's Planned Armed March

[pcosmar]

Why don't you spend your time finding the posts where I said adam was a threat to the country and should be rounded up?

Don't have to,, You are going all racist with the alleged "Russian" bullshit.

you have no valid argument, so are going on the attack of his ancestry.

a tactic seen before,

 

[klamath]

Don't have to,, You are going all racist with the alleged "Russian" bullshit.

you have no valid argument, so are going on the attack of his ancestry.

a tactic seen before,

It has nothing to do with racism. Nice try. It has to do where Sam Adams would send the government desenter to.

 

[aGameOfThrones]

Wouldn't it be funny if kokesh secretly distributed toy guns to every person going to the rally instead of them having real guns? It would defeat the purpose of the rally, but to look at the cops faces after realizing they just arrested people for having toy guns would be funny.

 

[MoneyWhereMyMouthIs2]

Wouldn't it be funny if kokesh secretly distributed toy guns to every person going to the rally instead of them having real guns? It would defeat the purpose of the rally, but to look at the cops faces after realizing they just arrested people for having toy guns would be funny.

Their faces would be smiling as they beat the tar out of people for "wasting their time" and other such bullshit reasons cops come up with. Then they would be charges with various offenses, regardless of the facts involved.

 

[Weston White]

Wouldn't it be funny if kokesh secretly distributed toy guns to every person going to the rally instead of them having real guns? It would defeat the purpose of the rally, but to look at the cops faces after realizing they just arrested people for having toy guns would be funny.

Yes, but they would just change the charge to whatever their penal code is for brandishing or displaying an imitation or replica firearm.

 

[Weston White]

Why don't you spend your time finding the posts where I said adam was a threat to the country and should be rounded up?

With the difference being that Loyalists, collectively, were a perceived threat to America's desire for obtaining true independence from its monarchy control, while Adam is not a threat to America, he (including all true libertarians) is only a threat in-so-far that he (we/they) labors to expose its (and our) corrupted, puppet government—which was long ago hijacked by progressive internationalists to covertly carry out their wicked agendas; he is a threat only to the modern day equivalent of what Loyalists were representative of.

 

[Warrior_of_Freedom]

Remember guys, we have to "Do civil disobedience the right way." I suppose D.C's chief of police also thinks blacks shouldn't have sat in front of the bus because it was a violation of the law. Actually I just think she doesn't know the difference between civil disobedience and protesting.

 

[CCTelander]

Remember guys, we have to "Do civil disobedience the right way." I suppose D.C's chief of police also thinks blacks shouldn't have sat in front of the bus because it was a violation of the law. Actually I just think she doesn't know the difference between civil disobedience and protesting.

Or, the two are synonymous in her eyes.

 

[Philhelm]

Remember guys, we have to "Do civil disobedience the right way." I suppose D.C's chief of police also thinks blacks shouldn't have sat in front of the bus because it was a violation of the law. Actually I just think she doesn't know the difference between civil disobedience and protesting.

Wait until she gets a load of uncivil disobedience.

 

[klamath]

With the difference being that Loyalists, collectively, were a perceived threat to America's desire for obtaining true independence from its monarchy control, while Adam is not a threat to America, he (including all true libertarians) is only a threat in-so-far that he (we/they) labors to expose its (and our) corrupted, puppet government—which was long ago hijacked by progressive internationalists to covertly carry out their wicked agendas; he is a threat only to the modern day equivalent of what Loyalists were representative of.

The loyalists were rounded up AFTER the peace treaty was signed. They were no longer a threat. They just weren't liked so Adams felt secure in trampling all over their rights. The japanese were also preceived as a collective threat. A whole hell of a lot has not changed, just the dates. First one group in power then the other once in power.

 

[torchbearer]

The loyalists were rounded up AFTER the peace treaty was signed. They were no longer a threat. They just weren't liked so Adams felt secure in trampling all over their rights. The japanese were also preceived as a collective threat. A whole hell of a lot has not changed, just the dates. First one group in power then the other once in power.

judging by where our country has ended up, and what happened with the "king loving" founders in the federalist/anti-federalist debates...
it would seem to me, adam didn't round up all of them.
he left some of the cancer in our governmental system, and it has grown to this.
the chemo didn't work, it time to add some radiation.

 

[klamath]

judging by where our country has ended up, and what happened with the "king loving" founders in the federalist/anti-federalist debates...
it would seem to me, adam didn't round up all of them.
he left some of the cancer in our governmental system, and it has grown to this.
the chemo didn't work, it time to add some radiation.

You might be right about the radiation. Full on thermal nuclear. Pretty much every last person on earth will try and control the lives of another for their own benefit. Hell about 50% of libertarians believe it is ok to take the life on an unborn child for someone elses conveneince.

 

[torchbearer]

You might be right about the radiation. Full on thermal nuclear. Pretty much every last person on earth will try and control the lives of another for their own benefit. Hell about 50% of libertarians believe it is ok to take the life on an unborn child for someone elses conveneince.

if you are taking everything literal, let me know. i'll keep it that way, but then i will assume everything you say is literal

 

[klamath]

if you are taking everything literal, let me know. i'll keep it that way, but then i will assume everything you say is literal

probably should have put the sarcasm face there. The point is it is ideas and beliefs not really people. How many times have you adamently argued with someone on a subject and had many people support your side only to turn around and get into another argument and be in total agreement with that person and in disagreement with the others that had been supporting you before? It is ideas you have to fight not people. You literally cannot kill enough people to have the remaining support your beliefs entirely and even if you could by the next generation all the idea you had fought would reapear. There has to be a better way.

 

[tod evans]

Or, the two are synonymous in her eyes.

It really doesn't matter when you're dealing with a double digit order follower...

She'll steer the goons where she's told to steer 'em.