helmuth_hubener
Banned
- Joined
- Nov 28, 2007
- Messages
- 9,484
Oh, and I hung out in Keene. Everyone was very hospitable. I wasn't abused once!
I'm starting to doubt myself now. I may have just driven through Alva and not made it as far as Aladdin; I can't remember for sure.I have actually been to Aladdin!
I have also been to Aladdin and even climbed Devil's Tower. Well, I didn't make it to the top but you have to contact the government ahead of time and get legal permission to climb it. I don't do that. I love rock climbing in WY, SD, IL or NH even. I never get government permission so I cannot go all the way up Devil's TowerThankfully, I don't have that problem in NH
![]()
I may or may not have climbed up Mt. Rushmore (I admit nothing!) so I could stand on top of Abe Lincoln's ugly head and spit on it. Security is not tight. They do have a guard building up there, though.
So does anyone else have some place they love and think would be a likely candidate?
Here is some data for you, counties under 1k pop (2012 est)
Loving County, Texas 71
Kalawao County, Hawaii 90
King County, Texas 276
Kenedy County, Texas 431
Arthur County, Nebraska 486
McPherson County, Nebraska 509
Petroleum County, Montana 511
Blaine County, Nebraska 514
Loup County, Nebraska 589
Borden County, Texas 616
Grant County, Nebraska 629
Yakutat City and Borough, Alaska 668
Thomas County, Nebraska 676
San Juan County, Colorado 690
Harding County, New Mexico 707
Mineral County, Colorado 709
McMullen County, Texas 726
Hooker County, Nebraska 727
Treasure County, Montana 736
Slope County, North Dakota 758
Banner County, Nebraska 760
Logan County, Nebraska 765
Esmeralda County, Nevada 775
Keya Paha County, Nebraska 804
Wheeler County, Nebraska 805
Hinsdale County, Colorado 810
Golden Valley County, Montana 839
Kent County, Texas 839
Roberts County, Texas 854
Clark County, Idaho 869
Billings County, North Dakota 905
Terrell County, Texas 917
Hayes County, Nebraska 953
Skagway Municipality, Alaska 959
Bristol Bay Borough, Alaska 991
is inaccessible by either road or rail.
That means it's perfect for Libertarians!
That does not work. The locals tried in during Vietnam and the US government hunted them down and killed them. Some underground railroad locations were raided. The underground tunnels between the US and Mexican border are hunted down and destroyed. The Israel government is destroying the underground tunnels over there. Big governments hate tunnels.I think libertarians need to think in the 3rd dimension. If you build underground and control the entry points, then the law beyond the gates no longer applies.
We must tunnel!!!.
This has been discussed before. I want to bring it up again and see how much interest there still is.
If there are about 1,000 liberty-lovers willing to relocate, we could all relocate to a town or county of population 1,000 or so and take over.
Who would be interested and willing to do such a thing?
Why is it that some of you want to associate me with unsavory people? People with which I have nothing to do? What is the purpose of that?
Why is it that some of you want to associate me with unsavory people? People with which I have nothing to do? What is the purpose of that?
Thanks! We're just getting started, though!As this thread passes into extinction, I thought I'd take a moment to express a couple of thoughts I've had about the OP.
True. I agree.There have been a few brilliant ideas expressed by the membership on how such a community could be set up. I would find it an interesting experience sharing such a community with many of you.
I haven't seen anyone express anything about principles like this. We are, in fact, working to implement the exact same principles: liberty, freedom, and independence. The same principles as the founders. The Spirit of '76, if you will.IMHO, none of these brilliant ideas were any better than the founding principles our country was supposedly built on.
Is it? I am not so sure as you. I would want proof. I am interested in things that work, that succeed. And my standard for success in this case is pretty high -- not unreasonably high, but higher than what I believe I can get by trying to "take back" my local government.Rather than finding a new location, I would encourage people to take back government at the local level. This is something that can be done.
I really do not think I can. I do not have that kind of power. Maybe if I devoted my life to it for the next year. But I don't want to do that. And I don't really see how it would solve anything. The next guy will be not much better. Nothing will truly change.Did your Mayor just have an 80 year old man arrested for asking him to speak up? You can have that Mayor out of office and in jail pretty darn quick. If we want it.
These are enormous projects. All of these would be made much easier with a majority backing them. Don't you think?At the local level, we can have Agenda 21 policies removed from Codes and Ordinances. At the local level, we can give back property rights to the property owners. Let local business' run without local government interference.
I think that forming a new community from scratch is too ambitious and not realistic. I propose something much more normal: move into an existing town. Act normal. Go about life. But bring along with you your strong political belief in liberty.It requires no more energy to fix the existing problem than it does to create a whole new community.
I think that the geographical concentration tactic is a very interesting and potentially effective method to do exactly what you are wanting to do. Why go it alone when you can have backup? Why lose, when you can win?Let's fix what we have...that's my point I think.
Why is it that some of you want to associate me with unsavory people? People with which I have nothing to do? What is the purpose of that?