CNN/ORC: Feb. 10-13 Independents Favorability Graphic ---Please Spread!!

ironj,

How about the second graphic I just added to the OP?

This includes all voters, not just Independents.
 
I tightened up the graphics a bit.

I switched typefaces. Using Franklin Gothic gives the headline more impact, because that font is commonly used for real newspapers. A few minor adjustments to give more impact. I added + sign to reinforce the notion of positive favorability. The negative favorabilities are now red. Increased the size of the % labels to increase impact. Added the question of who can beat Obama.

LGGQn.png


I want a link to the data to include on the graphic.
 
Last edited:
I tightened up the graphics a bit.

I switched typefaces. Using Franklin Gothic gives the headline more impact, because that font is commonly used for real newspapers. A few minor adjustments to give more impact. I added + sign to reinforce the notion of positive favorability. The negative favorabilities are now red. Increased the size of the % labels to increase impact. Added the question of who can beat Obama.

I want a link to the data to include on the graphic.

Why didn't I think to make the bars red? Nice touch! I do think some of the others changes take away from the "minimalistic" design, though.
 
Last edited:
The first blue & white graphic is the only one that has correct numbers, apparently.

I would put a line between Obama and the GOP candidates, and title it simply "Who's electable?" and remove the bit about CNN not reporting "correctly". I'll see if I can make my own.


Edited: Never mind, I see where he got the independent numbers. e.g. the Romney vs Obama are on page 9 of the PDF, etc.
 
Last edited:
Do you know right off hand where the numbers for independents are?

Pg 7-10 there's a page for each candidate. They took the favorability question and did different demographic splits, ie. age, income, ideology, Region, and tea party supports.
 
according to the PDF isn't it obama that has +8 and Paul +6?
graphics show it the other way around.

There's 2 graphics now in the OP.
One is isolated Indie support where Paul leads.
The other is the entire spectrum of people that answered the poll, where Obama has a slight lead.
 
I like this edit and I'm sharing it, along with the data source and Ron Paul's post-debate interview:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ht-lN_xJiXc
‎"When I'm polled against the Democrats and the independents, I do better than the rest. So, and you know, the Republican Party claims they want somebody to win.

...I have a broad base of appeal. That sort of goes by the way and of course I have the fight to get that message out."

The only things that have me a bit leery about the image is that, on the graph, not only is Ron Paul "blue", but "he's to the left of Obama..."

I tightened up the graphics a bit.

I switched typefaces. Using Franklin Gothic gives the headline more impact, because that font is commonly used for real newspapers. A few minor adjustments to give more impact. I added + sign to reinforce the notion of positive favorability. The negative favorabilities are now red. Increased the size of the % labels to increase impact. Added the question of who can beat Obama.

LGGQn.png


I want a link to the data to include on the graphic.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top