I'm a bit late to this discussion about race and politics, but a few things should be pointed out, as I have sympathies for both DevilsAdvocate and Klamath on this particular issue.
1. DA is correct that America's European/White population is losing its majority status in several states. Part of this problem is mass migration of paupers and low-skilled workers who are voting out the people already living there, but the bigger part of the problem is the moral depravity and "modern" views of sex that most left-leaning and even centrist European Americans have adopted (which HAVE NOT been adopted by other races to any great degree, save certain black conclaves). If you want to be pissed off at somebody for screwing things up for the white race DevilsAdvocate, you should be pissed off at the man-hating commie feminists and birth control advocates who have been telling to not have more than 1 or 2 kids while people of other races, particularly Roman Catholic ones, are having anywhere from 5 to 8 kids a piece. If you look at where whites still tend to hold a majority in America, it's in places where white people still believe that Christianity is more than some stupid feel-good hippie religion.
2. Klamath's concerns about Trump are not unique to a few people concerned about some dubious things he has said on race, which have bordered on retarded in several instances. I know several moderate-leaning Republicans who are not crazy about the idea of Rand Paul being the nominee because they believe the bullshit they read in their preferred news outlet, but none of them have expressed a desire to openly vote for a Democrat over Rand, with Trump they would not only vote for the Dem, but actively campaign against Trump. Speaking for myself, if Trump was running against Clinton I'd assume vote 3rd party and wash my hands to this nonsense.
3. Trump has ZERO respect for the rights granted to both the states and the people of this country, and thinks he can basically run things like we're in a Banana Republic. The fact that we have people calling this guy some second/third best candidate for liberty next to Rand Paul is so asinine that I feel stupid trying to explain what's wrong with such a notion. People are supporting Trump 100% because he has said something that has validated something in them emotionally, that's it, there is no logic to it whatsoever.
4. The only point I really disagree with Klamath on is the notion of Hillary being better than Trump. The only way I could justify this viewpoint is that Trump would be a disaster for the Liberty Movement, both as a losing nominee, but even worse so if he was actually elected. Every idiotic thing that Trump would say or do would be on us because, right or wrong, we are seen as anti-establishment. This whole anti-establishment support for Trump phenomenon is 100% fiction, manufactured by the same media that is suppressing Rand and supporting both his counterfeit doppelganger Cruz, as well as his enemies in Rubio and Christie. When people tell me they are planning to support Trump because he's "anti-establishment", my initial reaction is I'm talking to somebody who is either a complete imbecile with no critical thinking skills, or some neurotic political extremists who is so pissed at "the system" that he knows exactly what a Trump presidency would lead to and think it would be cool to watch everybody suffer through it.
