CA - Man rides motorcycle through "die-in" protest in San Fran

[angelatc]

http://www.rawstory.com/2017/06/not...un-over-trumpcare-protesters-with-motorcycle/

.

That is awesome picture. He should have it framed. Or at least make it his Facebook cover photo. Where do we send the bail money?

 

[angelatc]

This "double standards" thing is a weakness of our wing. If you're fighting, fight! That's it! Don't wring hands and be a git. In war you shoot the enemy, and -- double standard! -- not at me. It's a pretty simple rule: plow down your foes, with friends be cool.

+1776. No respect for these people at all.

 

[CaptUSA]

Streets are for driving, not for laying down on.

That street was identifying as a sidewalk. What is wrong with you?

 

[PierzStyx]

It amazes me how so-called libertarians turn right into progressives, sanctioning violence against those they disagree with to force them into acting or thinking differently, when an opposing view comes into play. Initiating violence against any group of people who are not actively trying to harm you is a violation of both the NAP and basic human liberty. If you don't own the street then you don't have a right to drive down it or be violent at others for obstructing your ability to do so. Sure, this form of protest looks pretty dumb. But that doesn't give you the right to initiate violence against them for using their freedom of speech.

 

[phill4paul]

It amazes me how so-called libertarians turn right into progressives, sanctioning violence against those they disagree with to force them into acting or thinking differently, when an opposing view comes into play. Initiating violence against any group of people who are not actively trying to harm you is a violation of both the NAP and basic human liberty. If you don't own the street then you don't have a right to drive down it or be violent at others for obstructing your ability to do so. Sure, this form of protest looks pretty dumb. But that doesn't give you the right to initiate violence against them for using their freedom of speech.

Blocking commerce and impeding the right to travel of others is an act of aggression and as such may be met with the minimum force necessary to correct such action. Nothing un-libertarian about wanting to use the road for it's intended purpose. Which is commerce and travel.

 

[dannno]

It amazes me how so-called libertarians turn right into progressives, sanctioning violence against those they disagree with to force them into acting or thinking differently, when an opposing view comes into play. Initiating violence against any group of people who are not actively trying to harm you is a violation of both the NAP and basic human liberty. If you don't own the street then you don't have a right to drive down it or be violent at others for obstructing your ability to do so. Sure, this form of protest looks pretty dumb. But that doesn't give you the right to initiate violence against them for using their freedom of speech.

There was no violence. He went up to them and stopped. CLEARLY he was not trying to hit any of them, he waited for the red sea to part, then he went through the middle without hitting anybody. He used his engine to scare the shit out of them to move out of the way.

If it was a sidewalk, I would understand, but they are in the middle of the street.

 

[phill4paul]

There was no violence. He went up to them and stopped. CLEARLY he was not trying to hit any of them, he waited for the red sea to part, then he went through the middle without hitting anybody. He used his engine to scare the shit out of them to move out of the way.

If it was a sidewalk, I would understand, but they are in the middle of the street.

Speaking of "parting the Red Sea" he sure cured them of whatever ailed them. Be he-aled!

 

[Dr.3D]

He obviously knew how slippery snowflakes can be when the street is covered with them.

 

[Brian4Liberty]

Blocking commerce and impeding the right to travel of others is an act of aggression and as such may be met with the minimum force necessary to correct such action. Nothing un-libertarian about wanting to use the road for it's intended purpose. Which is commerce and travel.

Agree. And the biggest offenders are the Police, who block roads constantly, and often for no good reason.

You must spread some Reputation around before giving it to phill4paul again.

 

[Danke]

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4633180/The-nut-plowed-crowd-protesters.html#ixzz4krmdiVBq


EXCLUSIVE: The motorcycle nut who plowed through a crowd of Trumpcare protesters is a sleazy porn boss who boasts of 'white pride' and claims he can't be racist because he married a 'slant eye import'

• Jeff Dillon, 39, was arrested Wednesday for speeding his motorcycle through a crowd of Trumpcare protesters in San Francisco
• DailyMail.com can reveal Dillon is a hardcore Trump supporter who heads the business development department of porn website GameLink
• Dillon ran a Facebook group called White Privilege Club which sought to celebrate 'white culture'
• The heavily tattooed self-described bodybuilder has his nickname, Dillonaire, inked on his forearm
• Dillon was cited for reckless driving and released without being booked into jail

By Ryan Parry West Coast Correspondent For Dailymail.com


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4633180/The-nut-plowed-crowd-protesters.html#ixzz4krrbyNs0
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

 

[Brian4Liberty]

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4633180/The-nut-plowed-crowd-protesters.html

EXCLUSIVE: The motorcycle nut who plowed through a crowd of Trumpcare protesters is a sleazy porn boss who boasts of 'white pride' and claims he can't be racist because he married a 'slant eye import'
...

"Plowed".

 

[angelatc]

After he was detained the 39-year-old told some of the crowd: 'You guys were blocking the intersection and now you’re not. See how that works?'.

Hahahaha!!

 

[phill4paul]

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4633180/The-nut-plowed-crowd-protesters.html#ixzz4krmdiVBq


EXCLUSIVE: The motorcycle nut who plowed through a crowd of Trumpcare protesters is a sleazy porn boss who boasts of 'white pride' and claims he can't be racist because he married a 'slant eye import'

• Jeff Dillon, 39, was arrested Wednesday for speeding his motorcycle through a crowd of Trumpcare protesters in San Francisco
• DailyMail.com can reveal Dillon is a hardcore Trump supporter who heads the business development department of porn website GameLink
• Dillon ran a Facebook group called White Privilege Club which sought to celebrate 'white culture'
• The heavily tattooed self-described bodybuilder has his nickname, Dillonaire, inked on his forearm
• Dillon was cited for reckless driving and released without being booked into jail

By Ryan Parry West Coast Correspondent For Dailymail.com


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4633180/The-nut-plowed-crowd-protesters.html#ixzz4krrbyNs0
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

Oh, fuck. That is a header of headers.

 

[Natural Citizen]

I swear, I saw a dwarf run by in that video.

 

[ChristianAnarchist]

I swear, I saw a dwarf run by in that video.

No, there was a "vertically challenged" individual...

 

[Dr.3D]

"Plowed".

See? They know they are Snowflakes.

 

[specsaregood]

"Plowed".

See? They know they are Snowflakes.

Well, that comment can't be topped.

 

[donnay]

See? They know they are Snowflakes.

LOL!

 

[phill4paul]

I swear, I saw a dwarf run by in that video.

Astute. Most people would have taken it for a hobbit. But, it's a dwarf. They they prefer the shiney to all else.

 

[Anti Federalist]

It amazes me how so-called libertarians turn right into progressives, sanctioning violence against those they disagree with to force them into acting or thinking differently, when an opposing view comes into play. Initiating violence against any group of people who are not actively trying to harm you is a violation of both the NAP and basic human liberty. If you don't own the street then you don't have a right to drive down it or be violent at others for obstructing your ability to do so. Sure, this form of protest looks pretty dumb. But that doesn't give you the right to initiate violence against them for using their freedom of speech.

Oh horseshit.

There was no violence, this is equivalent to bullhorning in counter protest.