BREAKING - El Paso TX - Mass Shooting at Wal Mart

Somebody has been tampering with the info one way or the other.


Somebody probably added the Christian part:






At 2:50 PM leftists changed his political affiliation from Democrat to Republican.

my-life-shooter-2.png

At 2:52 his profile was changed again.
His description now says he is a Republican and QAnon member.
my-life-shooter-3.png

By Saturday night his profile includes anti-Jewish slurs and links him to Trump and Jeffrey Epstein and calls him an Evangelical Christian.

my-life-shooter-4-600x293.jpg



More at: https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/20...aturday-shooting-from-democrat-to-republican/

Sounds about right.

Democrat does false flag after changing his party affiliation from democrat to republican.
 


Thanks

In the absence of anything else, I chalk that up to a confused witness.

Incompetent? Since 98% of people believe whatever the teevee says, even when the stories change repeatedly, I'd argue it's not incompetent at all. There's a relatively small amount of people paying attention to the details and of course the media themselves always quickly drop the initial multiple shooters reports. One shooter is much easier to close the case on than multiple shooters, which would raise a lot more questions than blaming it on some lone gunman with a political axe to grind.

Why use multiple shooters in the first place?

Think about it. You want a shooting, so the TV can tell people guns are bad. You could send in one guy, which the media would then report as one guy (on their own intitiative, you wouldn't have to tell them to lie), and there would be no evidence to contradict your story, because it in fact was one guy. Alternatively, you could send in four guys (why?), then tell the media to lie (risks leak), even though the story would be just as good if they reported the truth. Again, it makes no sense.
 
Thanks

In the absence of anything else, I chalk that up to a confused witness.



Why use multiple shooters in the first place?

Think about it. You want a shooting, so the TV can tell people guns are bad. You could send in one guy, which the media would then report as one guy (on their own intitiative, you wouldn't have to tell them to lie), and there would be no evidence to contradict your story, because it in fact was one guy. Alternatively, you could send in four guys (why?), then tell the media to lie (risks leak), even though the story would be just as good if they reported the truth. Again, it makes no sense.

They want a maximum number of kills before the local cops arrive, multiple people can kill more victims faster.
 
Sounds about right.

Democrat does false flag after changing his party affiliation from democrat to republican.
Classic false flag whether the deepstate was behind it or just took advantage of it. (the former is much more likely in this case)
 
To all of you going on about this like it wasn't a false flag, just stop. Use your common sense and stop propping up the mainstream narrative. Unless I was present and stray bullet clipped part of my ear off, I don't believe none of this shit, and even then, it would be government agents doing the shooting. All this shit is too convenient to be credible.
 
Thanks

In the absence of anything else, I chalk that up to a confused witness.

OK. She must have been really confused, 3 or 4 men in all black firing rifles right in front of her at the checkout area, confused with a dorky kid with an AK. Like I said, it's a recurring theme in many of these shooting events. Multiple shooters in black and then the multiple shooter reports are quickly dropped, never to be heard again.

Why use multiple shooters in the first place?

Think about it. You want a shooting, so the TV can tell people guns are bad. You could send in one guy, which the media would then report as one guy (on their own intitiative, you wouldn't have to tell them to lie), and there would be no evidence to contradict your story, because it in fact was one guy. Alternatively, you could send in four guys (why?), then tell the media to lie (risks leak), even though the story would be just as good if they reported the truth. Again, it makes no sense.

The media is nothing more than PR megaphones for the local PDs and FBI. That's it. No one has to tell them to lie when all they do is parrot LEO press conferences, CNN and AP reports. They don't investigate anything. Ask Ben Swann how investigating things turns out. I knew a guy that worked in the local Fox tv station. He told me all of their non-local "news" originated from two sources, the AP and CNN and they pushed it out dutifully every day.
 
They want a maximum number of kills before the local cops arrive, multiple people can kill more victims faster.

Target of alleged false flag, watching coverage: "Mass shooting! Need gun control! ..wait, only 12, not 20 killed? 2AM4LIFE!!!"

giphy.gif
 
Target of alleged false flag, watching coverage: "Mass shooting! Need gun control! ..wait, only 12, not 20 killed? 2AM4LIFE!!!"

giphy.gif

People's subconscious minds are often that dumb.

A propagandist like yourself should know that, but of course you do, it just suits your purpose to feign ignorance.
 
The media is nothing more than PR megaphones for the local PDs and FBI. That's it. No one has to tell them to lie when all they do is parrot LEO press conferences, CNN and AP reports. They don't investigate anything. Ask Ben Swann how investigating things turns out. I knew a guy that worked in the local Fox tv station. He told me all of their non-local "news" originated from two sources, the AP and CNN and they pushed it out dutifully every day.

Till it's explained why the CIA (or whoever) would intentionally leave loose ends to make their own story less credible, color me unconvinced.
 
Till it's explained why the CIA (or whoever) would intentionally leave loose ends to make their own story less credible, color me unconvinced.
There is plenty of evidence they do, so maybe they are just overconfident and incompetent because history has proven people like you will swallow whatever they are told.
 
People's subconscious minds are often that dumb.

A propagandist like yourself should know that, but of course you do, it just suits your purpose to feign ignorance.
I'm going to insist it's a false flag from the moment the story breaks, and regardless of what the evidence says, because I agree with some of the political views of the shooter, and it makes me and my ideological allies look bad if this was a real event, which deep down I know it was.

Yes, I know.
 
Shooter’ father is associated with John of God, according to sources who say this is his dad. It appears to be based on this photo. So he is basically one degree of separation away from Marina Abramovic. Also has a giant Star of David on the wall behind him, though the guy seems less Jewish and more some quasi-hippie-cultist in nature, but it is symbiology, which seems a way Cabalites signal something to each other. If he is Cabal, he would have brought in his kid. It wouldn’t surprise me if when recruited, “special” candidates are told they have been chosen for optimization programs because of their potential, and all they need to do is undergo some hypnosis, to make them faster, more focused, more capable, etc.
Other youtubes from Dad are being deleted, some archived here:
Meet Bryan (((Crusius)))
STORYTIME_The Meditation That Changed EVERYTHING (pt. 1)
STORYTIME_The Meditation That Changed EVERYTHING (pt. 2)
 


That woman has precisely zero reason to lie.



Incompetent? Since 98% of people believe whatever the teevee says, even when the stories change repeatedly, I'd argue it's not incompetent at all. There's a relatively small amount of people paying attention to the details and of course the media themselves always quickly drop the initial multiple shooters reports and turn into little more than PR agents for LEO. One shooter is much easier to close the case on than multiple shooters, which would raise a lot more questions than blaming it on some lone gunman with a political axe to grind.


From a site I visit:

Then there was the following still from this video at the Daily Mail:

If you are sharp, you will notice it would appear as if surveillance behind her is covering his mouth as he radios in through his chest mic, they have a bit of a problem. The hand is in the pocket because they wire the key for the mic in there, so he has to hit that to transmit. I’m not joking – it is literally that bad. I would not be surprised if the older guy on the other side is texting it in.
 
From a site I visit:

Then there was the following still from this video at the Daily Mail:

If you are sharp, you will notice it would appear as if surveillance behind her is covering his mouth as he radios in through his chest mic, they have a bit of a problem. The hand is in the pocket because they wire the key for the mic in there, so he has to hit that to transmit. I’m not joking – it is literally that bad. I would not be surprised if the older guy on the other side is texting it in.

He was picking his nose. Watch the video.
 
Back
Top