Bin Laden Killed? Who's buying it?

Which is it?


  • Total voters
    264
How did they have his DNA records on file to confirm it?
That's a good question, but I'm pretty sure they can match a person's DNA by comparison with DNA taken voluntarily from family members.

I still think the story is bullshit, but mainly for the reasons given earlier.
 
Yea, because Scheuer has the last word on it. Believe evidence not people. I trust Ron Paul on economic matters but if tomorrow he changes his mind and start preaching Keynesian policies, I wouldn't believe it.

Also why believe Scheuer, he wasn't there during the killing.

Scheuer is a very intelligent man and has very detailed, first hand knowledge of OBL. I said I'd reconsider, not take his word as gospel
 
That's a good question, but I'm pretty sure they can match a person's DNA by comparison with DNA taken voluntarily from family members.

I still think the story is bullshit, but mainly for the reasons given earlier.

He was a US asset and apparently had some medical work done in the US. As Pete stated elsewhere, it's in his CIA file
 
Woe for the 20 who voted Yes. LOL.

Well, now that I think about it the gov did kill Osama yesterday, maybe not the body but the name. Who's going to replace him now?
 
Last edited:
Scheuer is a very intelligent man and has very detailed, first hand knowledge of OBL. I said I'd reconsider, not take his word as gospel

You are fool if you believe a man's word without evidence, especially when he wasnt there when the incident happened. Sorry, but am not that easily convinced.
 
Last edited:
What do you guys think of this article:

http://www.salem-news.com/articles/may012011/bin-laden-tk.php

"First, let's remember that this man was not wanted in connected with the attacks that happened on U.S. soil 11 Sept. 2001. A statement was released by bin Laden immediately after the attacks stating that he had nothing to do with the U.S. attacks."

It has a lot of other interesting statements.

It's really hard to believe anything from the govt, like WMDs in Iraq.
 
http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalp...asing-photographs-of-bin-ladens-corpse-1.html

The Obama administration has photographs of Osama bin Laden’s dead body and officials are debating what to do with them and whether they should be released to the public, officials tell ABC News.

“There’s no doubt it’s him,” says a US official who has seen the pictures and also reminds us that OBL was 6’4”.

The argument for releasing them: to ensure that the public knows and can appreciate that he's dead. There is of course skepticism throughout the world that the US government claim that it killed bin Laden is true.

The argument against releasing the pictures: they’re gruesome. He has a massive head wound above his left eye where he took bullet, with brains and blood visible.

In July 2003, the US government released photographs of Saddam Hussein’s dead sons Uday and Qusay Hussain but not until after they’d been touched up by a mortician, making them look not quite real.

http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/05/02/us-binladen-kill-idUSTRE7413H220110502

(Reuters) - The U.S. special forces team that hunted down Osama bin Laden was under orders to kill the al Qaeda mastermind, not capture him, a U.S. national security official told Reuters.

"This was a kill operation," the official said, making clear there was no desire to try to capture bin Laden alive in Pakistan.

Because you cant showcase a fake?
 
Last edited:
When your level of trust in government is at an all time low, and then the government comes out and tells you that they killed the most important figure in the "War on Terror" but shipped him out to sea really fast and dumped him into the water, because they didn't want to piss off Muslims by breaking tradition (even though we've been bombing the middle east for 20 years without any regard to their feelings), nearly anything is more plausible as truth than the 'official stories'.
 
When your level of trust in government is at an all time low, and then the government comes out and tells you that they killed the most important figure in the "War on Terror" but shipped him out to sea really fast and dumped him into the water, because they didn't want to piss off Muslims by breaking tradition (even though we've been bombing the middle east for 20 years without any regard to their feelings), nearly anything is more plausible as truth than the 'official stories'.


+rep, I said something similar in another thread.
 
Last edited:
Is everything now a conspiracy theory?
No -- just Project MK ULTRA, Operation Northwoods, the Gulf of Tonkin, Saddam's WMDs, the action-packed Jessica Lynch "rescue," etc. In other words, there is no doubt whatsoever that the US government has a history of lying and, yes, conspiring. So when a story seems suspicious, it is a very good idea to question it.
 
Is everything now a conspiracy theory?

The problem is once they tell a lie that big they got to keep lying to cover up the first lie...so yeah..... lot's of conspiracies. But the real reason everything is so transparent to anyone paying attention is because it is meant to be transparent. The globalists are taking this country down also and are doing a good job of making us look bad. Same thing with Obama's new birth certificate. Not only is it a fake.... it was intentionally a very bad fake. 9/11 obvious false flag. On and on and on. Order out of Chaos.
 
When your level of trust in government is at an all time low, and then the government comes out and tells you that they killed the most important figure in the "War on Terror" but shipped him out to sea really fast and dumped him into the water, because they didn't want to piss off Muslims by breaking tradition (even though we've been bombing the middle east for 20 years without any regard to their feelings), nearly anything is more plausible as truth than the 'official stories'.

That's a good point, but haven't they already released the pictures?
 
Back
Top