Armed Drone Caught On Camera Outside Chicago Prior To NATO Summit (video)

[Domalais]

It's true to what's been admitted as true. (That there are drones flying over the U.S.)

Yes. Just like the fact that there are cars in the U.S. is exactly the same as a tank driving down Pennsylvania Ave.

 

[jmdrake]

Yes. Just like the fact that there are cars in the U.S. is exactly the same as a tank driving down Pennsylvania Ave.

A car isn't a tank. A drone is a drone. So if you want to make an honest analogy (and you probably don't) you'd have to say "The fact that there are tanks all over public roads in Washington D.C. is the same as a tank driving down Penn. Ave".

 

[Domalais]

A car isn't a tank. A drone is a drone. So if you want to make an honest analogy (and you probably don't) you'd have to say "The fact that there are tanks all over public roads in Washington D.C. is the same as a tank driving down Penn. Ave".

The drones that police departments want to fly have as much in common with an armed, loaded Predator as a snowmobile has in common with an M1A1 Abrams.

 

[phill4paul]

The drones that police departments want to fly have as much in common with an armed, loaded Predator as a snowmobile has in common with an M1A1 Abrams.

Today. Tomorrow...meh. Rapidly advancing incrementalism.

 

[Domalais]

Today. Tomorrow...meh. Rapidly advancing incrementalism.

It's not about slippery slopes. It's about truth.

Saying that the government is operating an army of robots is scary. Unless they are Roombas.


The fact that this hoax is being accepted and encouraged 'in spirit' is breathtakingly retarded.

 

[Anti Federalist]

The drones that police departments want to fly have as much in common with an armed, loaded Predator as a snowmobile has in common with an M1A1 Abrams.

They provide universal surveillance coverage.

Having big brother flying surveillance drones all around is not freedom.

What's your point here?

 

[Anti Federalist]

It's not about slippery slopes. It's about truth.

Saying that the government is operating an army of robots is scary. Unless they are Roombas.

The fact that this hoax is being accepted and encouraged 'in spirit' is breathtakingly retarded.

Those goalposts ever get heavy?

 

[jmdrake]

The drones that police departments want to fly have as much in common with an armed, loaded Predator as a snowmobile has in common with an M1A1 Abrams.

Did you not get the memo? This isn't just about police drones. U.S. military drones have been cleared for flying over the U.S.

 

[jmdrake]

I don't know what you are talking about. I've looked at both of the close up in photoshop. It is the same plane. 100% sure. It is a fact. Same angle. Same shadows. Same plane. From the same picture. Blur the plane and paste in on there and there is no difference.

The tail fins look different. Only two tail fins are clearly visible in the video when it is still.

 

[Domalais]

Those goalposts ever get heavy?

Which goalposts? The 'this video is of big brother ready to kill people in the name of nato' got moved to 'oh well it feels good to pretend it's true' pretty fast. You had a whole army to move those posts though.

 

[Domalais]

They provide universal surveillance coverage.

Having big brother flying surveillance drones all around is not freedom.

What's your point here?

When you try to change the topic that hard, does it make your neck hurt?

 

[phill4paul]

It's not about slippery slopes. It's about truth.

Saying that the government is operating an army of robots is scary. Unless they are Roombas.

No. A slippery slope took us to the point we are at NOW! And it gets STEEPER. What IS retarded is comparing surveillance aircraft (which are arms capable) with an domestic autonomous robotic vacuum cleaner.

 

[Domalais]

Did you not get the memo? This isn't just about police drones. U.S. military drones have been cleared for flying over the U.S.

Which I 98% disapprove of.


FAA clearance to fly and physically flying over an urban area at low altitude while armed with hellfire missiles are entirely different. If you can't see that, I'm afraid that the rhetoric has completely eaten your brain.

 

[jmdrake]

It's not about slippery slopes. It's about truth.

Saying that the government is operating an army of robots is scary. Unless they are Roombas.


The fact that this hoax is being accepted and encouraged 'in spirit' is breathtakingly retarded.

I'm willing to demure on whether this particular drone video is a hoax or not. But it's undeniable that the U.S. military is flying drones over the U.S.

http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2012/05/air-force-drones-domestic-spy/

It's also undeniable that the police departments are buying military style dones.



The military drones were originally unarmed as well.

 

[A Son of Liberty]

Yes. Just like the fact that there are cars in the U.S. is exactly the same as a tank driving down Pennsylvania Ave.

Ironically, I was driving north on I-79 two days ago, and I watched two APC's roll down the southbound side of the highway.

This is how you boil a frog.

 

[Carson]

From the comment section;

Never thought I would live to see the day that Americans are now the enemy of a derailed cabal reptilian government inside our own country.

Was there some book or movie I missed?

 

[Domalais]

Ironically, I was driving north on I-79 two days ago, and I watched two APC's roll down the southbound side of the highway.

This is how you boil a frog.

You probably saw the HMMWV replacements. They're extremely tall and boxy, with a V-shaped bottom hull.

 

[Domalais]

I'm willing to demure on whether this particular drone video is a hoax or not. But it's undeniable that the U.S. military is flying drones over the U.S.

http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2012/05/air-force-drones-domestic-spy/

It's also undeniable that the police departments are buying military style dones.

You obviously haven't read the document that is being discussed in that article. It has nothing to do with whether or not the military can fly drones over the U.S.

 

[jmdrake]

Which I 98% disapprove of.


FAA clearance to fly and physically flying over an urban area at low altitude while armed with hellfire missiles are entirely different. If you can't see that, I'm afraid that the rhetoric has completely eaten your brain.

I never said it was. If you think I did then your brain has been completely eaten. If you think that the police and U.S. military are flying entirely different types of drones than the ones that fire hellfire missiles, then you are ignorant of the facts. And if you think that the military style drones that police departments are now using cannot be quickly retrofitted with missiles then you don't know the history of the U.S. drone program. (Unmanned surveillance drones were retrofitted to carry missiles). And if you don't realize that the government only tells you half the truth, and that if they are honest about drones now they were probably flying over us a while back, and tomorrow they'll let us in on the armed ones, then I'm not sure what else to say. "Roombas" indeed.

 

[jmdrake]

You obviously haven't read the document that is being discussed in that article. It has nothing to do with whether or not the military can fly drones over the U.S.

You obviously are logically challenged. Military drones were already able to fly over the U.S. The document discussed was whether or not surveillance would be allowed.